Advanced Search Results

Sand Plast (India) Ltd. Vs. I.T.C. Bhadrachalam Finance and Investment ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Company

Acts : Company (court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 2(13), 6, 13, 18, 21, 24, 26, 30, 33, 35, 40, 44, 47, 48, 49, 52, 53, 54 and 76; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(3), 433, 434, 439, 477, 478, 503, 539, 543, 545, 550, 552, 555, 621, 625, 633 and 643; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 4 and 7; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3; Power of Attorney Act, 1882; Oaths (Amendment) Act, 1873 - Sections 13; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 81 and 83; Conduct of Election Rules, 1961; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 139; Notaries Act, 1952; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 46

Reported in : [2002]111CompCas471(Raj); 2001(1)WLC469; 2003(1)WLN594

the rules made thereunder and in particular Rules 6, 18, 21 and 33 and certain provisions of the Oaths Act, 1969, General Clauses Act etc. He also relied on the following judgments reported in:i) Mool Chand Wahi vs. National … filed under Rule 21, Form 3--Rule 18 has no application--Appellant failed to prove infirmities.; Special Appeal Dismissed - Section 2(k), 2(1), 7 & 40 & Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules, 2007, Rule 12 & 98

Dilawarsab Alisab Jakati Vs. State of Karnataka by Its State Public Pr ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : CriminalCivil

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 326, 375, 376, 376(2) and 511; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 4 and 5; Evidence Act - Sections 3, 32 and 119; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2005CriLJ2687; ILR2005KAR2282

person can be recorded by signs made in open court and such evidence is admissible'.Section 4 of the Oaths Act, 1969 provides for oaths or affirmation to be made by witnensses, interpreter and jurors, which reads as follows:'4. Oaths … the offence under Section 376(2)(f) IPC in S.C. No. 47/2000 by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Belgaum, dated 28-2-2003 sentencing him to undergo R.I. for a period of 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs.

R. Krishnappa S/O. Ramappa Vs. the State of Karnataka Rep. by Its Secr ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Election

Acts : Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act - Sections 15, 43, 132, 167, 167(1), 167(2), 168, 168(2), 171 and 172; Bombay Public Trust Act - Sections 37(1); Evidence Act - Sections 3; Karnataka Panchayat Raj Rules; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 3, 6, 6(2) and 7

Reported in : ILR2008KAR2185; 2008(3)KarLJ238; 2008(4)KCCRSN249; 2008(2)AIRKarR353; AIR2008NOC1790

to render persons who give false evidence liable to prosecution as is clear from Section 6 of the Oaths Act, 1969. Section 7 of the Oaths Act clarifies that the proceedings will not be invalidated or the evidence will not … ORDERMohan Shantanagoudar, J.1. Petitioner has sought for quashing the order dated 29.7.2006, at Annexure-A, passed by the second respondent in Complaint No. SBC 2 CZP/2006, wherein the second respondent, declared

K.M. Singh Vs. Secretary, Association of Indian Universities and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 9

Reported in : 44(1991)DLT735

and Mandir, as referred to above, after the Oaths Act, 1873 was repealed under Section 9 of the Oaths Act, 1969 and consequently he is not bound by the statements of the defendants made in Gurudwara and Mandir. thereforee, … submission has relied upon a decision of the Kamataka High Court in Pacharanda Nanjappa v. Pacharanda Belliappa 1979(Kar) 2018In that a case the facts were almost similar as are in the present case. In that case the

P. Giribabu Vs. Deputy Director of Enforcement

Court : Chennai

Subject : FEMA

Acts : Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 - Sections 13, 37, 37(1) and 37(3); ;Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 131, 131(1), 131(B) and 293; ;Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 6(2) and 7; ;Sea Customs Act - Section 171A and 171A(4); ;Indian Oaths Act, 1873; ;Advocates Act, 1961 - Section 30; ;Karnataka Land Reforms Act - Section 20A; ;Haryana Ceiling on Land Holdings Act; ;Customs Act, 1962 - Section 108; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 135(2) - Order 10, Rule 2 - Order 16 - Order 18, Rule 2; ;Constitution of India - Articles 20(3) and 21

Reported in : [2010]99SCL268(Mad)

Section 37 of FEMA also, the persons summoned have to be examined on oath. Section 7 of the Oaths Act, 1969 provides that what is recorded after administration of Oath is evidence. Income-tax Act provides that examination by an … need be.2. The averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition in W.P. No. 23110 of 2009, in nutshell is set out hereunder:(i) The petitioner is a businessman and has a jewellery shop

Kalu Sanil Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) Represented by Its Secretary, ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 18, Rule 4; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment), 2002; Evidence Act, 1872; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 6(2)

Reported in : ILR2008KAR4734; 2008(4)KCCR2804

is repugnant to the provisions contained under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (Act 1 of 1872) and the Oaths Act, 1969; and(ii) to quash the order dated 16.9.2005 made on I.A-IV filed in OS No. 176/1998 on the file … the suit. It is further contended that order 18 Rule 4 of CPC is in direct conflict with Section 6(2) of the Oaths Act as well as the Indian Evidence Act. It is also contended that the

V.R. Kamath Vs. Divisional Controller, Karnataka State Road Transport ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : High Court of Karnataka Rules, 1959 - Rule 2; Karnataka Civil Rules of Practice, 1967 - Rule 28-A; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 3(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 139 - Order 19, Rule 1 - Order 37A, Rule 3; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 297; Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 8, Rule 11(2); Writ Proceedings Rules, 1977 - Rules 3, 5 and 21; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR1997Kant275; ILR1997KAR1856

imposed or in exercise of the powers conferred upon them by law. Sub-section (2) of Sec. 3 of Oaths Act provides that the High Court may empower any person to administer oaths and affirmation in respect of affidavits … to the persons concerned, is an indication of the sad state of affairs.5. Section 3(1) of the Oath Act, 1969, empowers Courts and persons having by law or consent of parties, authority 'to receive evidence, to administer oaths

In the Matter Of: Bonneswar Dutta and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 437, 438, 438(1) and 439(1);; Oaths Act, 1969 - Section 4(2);; Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 20(3) and 226;; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 132;; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22 and 34;; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 147;; Court Fees Act, 1870 - Section 19

Reported in : (1998)1CALLT74(HC),1998(1)CHN123,1998CriLJ1383

filing an affidavit, is that event that would amount to violation of the provisions section 4(2) of the Oaths Act, 1969 which provides as hereunder:'......Nothing is this section shall render it lawful to administer, is a criminal proceeding, an

Mahendra Singh Gehlot Vs. State and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 1978WLN(UC)357

of the affidavit is of no material significance in view of the provisions of Section 7 of the Oaths Act, 1969, which read as follows:7. Proceedings and evidence not invalidated by omission of oath or irregularity No omission to … false. But this defect in the swearing in of the affidavit is of no material significance.;Writ dismissed - Section 2(k), 2(1), 7 & 40 & Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules, 2007, Rule 12 & 98

Arjun Rai Vs. State of Sikkim

Court : Sikkim

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Criminal Procdeure Code , 1974 - Sections 164(5); Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 4(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300

Reported in : 2004CriLJ4747

person (accused). At that stage, we may have a look at Sub-section (2) of Section 4 of the Oaths Act, 1969 which states inter alia that nothing in the said section shall render it lawful to administer, in a