Advanced Search Results

Godekari Ragamma Vs. Vageneni Tirupati and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 4, 5 and 6(1); Indian Oaths Act, 1873

Reported in : 2000(5)ALD98; 2000(4)ALT482

learned Counsel for the petitioner-plaintiff relying upon Sections 4, 5 and 6 read with the Schedule of the Oaths Act, 1969 (Act 44 of 1969 - for short 'the New Act') submits that a witness has an option, in … to make an affirmation before giving evidence.5. Sri P. Sridhar Reddy, learned Counsel for the petitioner-plaintiff relying upon Sections 4, 5 and 6 read with the Schedule of the Oaths Act, 1969 (Act 44 of 1969 - … are the following:The petitioner herein is the plaintiff in OS No.16 of 1989 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge's Court, Kavali, which was

Hiralal Parbhudas Vs. Ganesh Trading Company and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchsandlse Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 12, 12(3) and 56; Trade and Merchandised Marks Rules, 1959 - Rule 116(1) and 116(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 6; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : AIR1984Bom218

affidavits with the correct heading and which declared before the Executive magistrate, Taluka Bhuj. Section 3(1)(a) of the Oaths Act, 1969 empowers 'all courts and persons having by law authority to receive evidence to administer oath. Section 6 of

R. Krishnappa S/O. Ramappa Vs. the State of Karnataka Rep. by Its Secr ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Election

Acts : Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act - Sections 15, 43, 132, 167, 167(1), 167(2), 168, 168(2), 171 and 172; Bombay Public Trust Act - Sections 37(1); Evidence Act - Sections 3; Karnataka Panchayat Raj Rules; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 3, 6, 6(2) and 7

Reported in : ILR2008KAR2185; 2008(3)KarLJ238; 2008(4)KCCRSN249; 2008(2)AIRKarR353; AIR2008NOC1790

to render persons who give false evidence liable to prosecution as is clear from Section 6 of the Oaths Act, 1969. Section 7 of the Oaths Act clarifies that the proceedings will not be invalidated or the evidence will not … 4.1.2006. Therefore, the petitioner ought: to have resigned to the seat of the member of Grama Panchayat, within 15 days from 4.1.2006, in view of Section 167(2) of Panchayat Raj Act (for short hereinafter referred to as

Bal Krishan Julka Vs. K.L. Verma

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 7; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 6; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1)

Reported in : AIR1982Delhi19; 20(1981)DLT383; 1981(2)DRJ254

applicable in India, where the Indian Oaths Act, 1873 was in force up to 26th December, 1969, The Oaths act, 1969 came into force from 26th December, 1969 repealing the Act of 1873. The relevant provisions for the purpose … Sultan Singh, J.(1) This revision petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (here in after called 'the Act') is directed against the

Sand Plast (India) Ltd. Vs. I.T.C. Bhadrachalam Finance and Investment ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Company

Acts : Company (court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 2(13), 6, 13, 18, 21, 24, 26, 30, 33, 35, 40, 44, 47, 48, 49, 52, 53, 54 and 76; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(3), 433, 434, 439, 477, 478, 503, 539, 543, 545, 550, 552, 555, 621, 625, 633 and 643; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 4 and 7; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3; Power of Attorney Act, 1882; Oaths (Amendment) Act, 1873 - Sections 13; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 81 and 83; Conduct of Election Rules, 1961; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 139; Notaries Act, 1952; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 46

Reported in : [2002]111CompCas471(Raj); 2001(1)WLC469; 2003(1)WLN594

the rules made thereunder and in particular Rules 6, 18, 21 and 33 and certain provisions of the Oaths Act, 1969, General Clauses Act etc. He also relied on the following judgments reported in:i) Mool Chand Wahi vs. National … (JTC Bhadrachalam Finance & Investment Ltd. Mumbai. Company Petition No. 9/97 was filed by the respondent herein under Sections, 433, 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 for winding up of the appellant company. According to … the Company Petition (Sand Plast India Ltd., Jaipur) against the order dated, 15th September, 1998 passed in S.B. Company Petition No. 9/97, by P.P. Naolekar,

In the Matter Of: Bonneswar Dutta and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 437, 438, 438(1) and 439(1);; Oaths Act, 1969 - Section 4(2);; Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 20(3) and 226;; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 132;; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22 and 34;; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 147;; Court Fees Act, 1870 - Section 19

Reported in : (1998)1CALLT74(HC),1998(1)CHN123,1998CriLJ1383

filing an affidavit, is that event that would amount to violation of the provisions section 4(2) of the Oaths Act, 1969 which provides as hereunder:'......Nothing is this section shall render it lawful to administer, is a criminal proceeding, an … 1. This is an application under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed in the names of

P. Giribabu Vs. Deputy Director of Enforcement

Court : Chennai

Subject : FEMA

Acts : Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 - Sections 13, 37, 37(1) and 37(3); ;Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 131, 131(1), 131(B) and 293; ;Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 6(2) and 7; ;Sea Customs Act - Section 171A and 171A(4); ;Indian Oaths Act, 1873; ;Advocates Act, 1961 - Section 30; ;Karnataka Land Reforms Act - Section 20A; ;Haryana Ceiling on Land Holdings Act; ;Customs Act, 1962 - Section 108; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 135(2) - Order 10, Rule 2 - Order 16 - Order 18, Rule 2; ;Constitution of India - Articles 20(3) and 21

Reported in : [2010]99SCL268(Mad)

Section 37 of FEMA also, the persons summoned have to be examined on oath. Section 7 of the Oaths Act, 1969 provides that what is recorded after administration of Oath is evidence. Income-tax Act provides that examination by an … respondent in pursuant of the summons issued to them under Section 37 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA) and recording of statement, though the advocate will be present beyond the hearing distance, if need be.2.

Kabiraj Tudu Vs. State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 165 and 118; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 4(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 299, 300, 302 and 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 165, 172(2), 173 and 174

body or mind, or any other cause of the same kind. Sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Oaths Act, 1969 mandates that oath or affirmation shall be made by the persons indicated in Clauses (a), (b) and (c),

K.M. Singh Vs. Secretary, Association of Indian Universities and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 9

Reported in : 44(1991)DLT735

and Mandir, as referred to above, after the Oaths Act, 1873 was repealed under Section 9 of the Oaths Act, 1969 and consequently he is not bound by the statements of the defendants made in Gurudwara and Mandir. thereforee, … Nag, J. (1) In this revision petition, the petitioner seeks for setting aside the order dated 30th January, 1989 passed by Shri S. C. Mittal, Additional District Judge, Delhi dismissing the application filed on behalf of the

Om Prakash Suthar Vs. the State of Rajasthan and Others

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2012CrLJ2341

parties, perused the orders impugned passed by the learned courts below, the provision of Section 6(1) of the Oaths Act, 1969 and have considered the arguments advanced at the bar. 4. The provision of Section 6(1) of the Oaths