Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: notaries act 1952 section 19 · Page 1 of about 121 results (0.040 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 16 2007

Shanti Films Rep. by Its Proprietor K. Rajamanickam and R. Kavitha, Ka ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-16-2007

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsMedia and Communication

Acts : Partnership Act - Sections 69; Copyrights Act, 1957 - Sections 19; Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 15; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 63 and 65; Notaries Rules, 1956 - Rule 11(2)

Reported in : LC2007(3)243

11(2) of the Notaries Rules, 1956 framed by the Central Government drawing powers under Section 15 of the Notaries Act, 1952, every Notary shall maintain notarial register in prescribed form XV which provides for entry of every notarial act … arrangement, Ex.P18 coupled with entire payment of consideration therefor amounts to assignment of the copyright as contemplated under Section 19 of the Copyrights Act, 1957.22. Per contra, the learned Counsel for Emgeeyar Pictures would contend that there is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 2025

Smt.S.Savithramma vs Smt.S.Padmavathamma

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-26-2025

of the Registration Act.13. However, the word “attestation”, whenused in terms of what the Notary appointed under the Notaries Act, 1952 is required to do would take it out from the ambit of being a witness to the instrument/document, … SRI. N.K.RAMESH, ADV. FOR R9 TO R12; R2, R5(A), R5(B), R11-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER 41,RULE 1 OF THE CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENTAND DECREE DATED 07.02.2020 PASSED … Subbarao, who purchased it under a registered sale deed in the year 1948-49. On February 15, 1973, he executed a Will, bequeathing the property to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 04 2007

Nandkishor S/O Gangaram Dhudkekar Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Ministry o ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-04-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 3, 5, 6, 7(3), 8, 15 and 19(4); Notaries Rules, 1956 - Rules 3, 4, 6, 6(1), 7, 7(3), 8, 8(1), 8(2), 8(3), 8A, 8(4A), 13, 17; Notaries (Amendment) Act, 1956; Bangalore Development Act, 1976; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : AIR2007Bom186; 2007(5)ALLMR217; 2007(4)BomCR519; 2008(1)MhLj349

petitioner seeks consideration of his application at Annexure-A for being appointed as Notary under the provisions of the Notaries Act, 1952. He has also contended that the respondents must be directed to frame appropriate policy or guidelines for making … any change in development scheme should be 21 made only by following procedure prescribed in Sub-section 4 of Section 19 and as the exercise of power in conversion of land of public park into a land for private

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 19 1997

V.R. Kamath Vs. Divisional Controller, Karnataka State Road Transport ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-19-1997

Subject : Civil

Acts : High Court of Karnataka Rules, 1959 - Rule 2; Karnataka Civil Rules of Practice, 1967 - Rule 28-A; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 3(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 139 - Order 19, Rule 1 - Order 37A, Rule 3; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 297; Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 8, Rule 11(2); Writ Proceedings Rules, 1977 - Rules 3, 5 and 21; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR1997Kant275; ILR1997KAR1856

or affirmation may be administered to the deponent by any Court or Magistrate, any Notary appointed under the Notaries Act, 1952 or any officer or other person appointed by the High Court in that behalf or any officer appointed … an affidavit has no value and in fact is not valid.4.1. Order 19, Rule 1 of C.P.C. provides thatany Court may order that particular fact … are required to be reminded to the persons concerned, is an indication of the sad state of affairs.5. Section 3(1) of the Oath Act, 1969, empowers Courts and persons having by law or consent of parties, authority

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 2006

Alan Kaye Vs. Recovery Officer, Employees' Provident Fund Organisation ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-24-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(14) and 18; ;Evidence Act - Section 82; ;Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 14 and 15; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 139 - Order 19, Rule 3; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;High Court Rules - Rules 16, 27, 28, 29, 36 and 36(6)

Reported in : AIR2006Cal158,2006(2)CHN409

Civil Procedure Code also provides that oath on affidavit may be administered by any notaries appointed under the Notaries Act, 1952. 28. Thus, when the affidavit affirmed in England before the Notary Public can be accepted by this Court … to be done in terms of the provision as contained in Order 19 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure read with Rule 36 … said supplementary affidavit cannot be accepted, as the said document was not stamped with requisite stamp-duty as per Section 18 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. 5. Re: Ground No. (iii): With regard to the objection as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2001

Ashok Yeshwant Badave Vs. Surendra Madhavrao Nighojakar and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-14-2001

Subject : CriminalBanking

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 5, 6, 19, 138, 139 and 142; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 420; Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 16; Banking, Public Financial Institutions and Negotiable Instruments Laws (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Sections 4; Bills of Exchange Act, 1882; Indian Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 20

Reported in : AIR2001SC1315; 2001(1)ALD(Cri)668; 2001ALLMR(Cri)1028(SC); 2001(2)ALT(Cri)11; 2001CriLJ1674; JT2001(3)SC508; 2001(2)KLT28(SC); 2001(2)SCALE472; (2001)3SCC726; [2001]2SCR426

and Section 139 dealt with power to make rules for Notary Public. But with the introduction of the Notaries Act, 1952 making elaborate provision for appointment of Notaries and their duties, functions, etc., the aforesaid provision became redundant and … was acceded to by the complainant. Ultimately, as the period of six months was going to expire on 19.7.1996, the complainant had no option but to present the said cheque before his banker for encashment, but the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 2007

Crocodile Int. Pte Ltd. and anr. Vs. Lacoste S.A. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-20-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Delhi High Court Act - Sections 10 and 10(1); Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 14; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 2 and 104 - Order 11, Rule 11 - Order 19, Rule 2 - Order 43, Rule 1; Indian Arbitration Act, 1939 - Sections 20; Delhi High Court Rules

Reported in : 2008(100)DRJ547

that even though there might be no reciprocity between India and another country under Section 14 of the Notaries Act, 1952, the notarial acts of the Notaries in the foreign country could be given legal recognition by the courts … the Letters Patent. The above view was followed in The Public Trustee v. Rajeshwar Tyagi and Ors. AIR 1972 Del 302.7. The restricted interpretation placed upon the term 'Judgment' in Hafiz Mohd. case (supra) did not find

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 1966

Sri Kashi Prasad Saksena Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-06-1966

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 311(1) and 311(2); Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 4, 5, 5(2), 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13(12), 15 and 15(2); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : AIR1967All173; (1967)IILLJ588All

him and asked the District Judge, Lucknow, who is a competent authority under the rules framed under the Notaries Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), (o make an enquiry. The District Judge framed the following three charges … or negligence on the part of the petitioner-appellant with the result that the case did not fall under Section 10 of the Act.8. It has also been contended that inasmuch as three charges were framed, and it … against the judgment of B. N. Nigam, J. dated 7th of May, 1966 dismissing Writ Petition No. 380 of 1964 filed by appellant, Sri Kashi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 03 1996

Rajendra Kumar Vs. Prabhu Ram Bana

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-03-1996

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1996(2)WLC158; 1996(1)WLN6

re-newed Under Section 5(2) of the Act, his name did not find place in the annual list of Notaries published by the State Government Under Section 6 of the Act.8A. It was also submitted by the learned … follows: Mr. Prabhoo Ram (hereinafter 'the petitioner') was appointed a Notary pursuant to the provisions of the Notary Act, 1952 (for short 'the Act') and the Notary Rules ('the Rules' hereinafter) by the State Government by order dated … two revision petitions stem from the same appellate order, dated November 16, 1995 passed by the learned Addl. District Judge, Ratangarh, whereby the appeal of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 04 2017

Jaldhi Overseas Pte Ltd. Vs. Bhushan Power and Steel Limited

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-04-2017

Subject : MRTP

the Central Government of any reciprocity with the Government of Singapore as envisaged in Section 14 of the Notaries Act, 1952, however, the said provision is only directory in nature as qualified by the word “may”. It is also … authentication is also in strict compliance of Section 3 of Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oath and Fees) Act, 1948. Although, there is no specific notification by the Central Government of any reciprocity with the Government of Singapore

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial