Advanced Search Results

Chandmal Motilal Bora, Advocate and Notary Vs. the State of Maharashtr ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Panel Code - Sections 120B, 120B(1), 120B(2), 324, 344, 347, 365, 387, 395 and 506; Notary Act, 1952 - Sections 8 and 13

Reported in : 2004(2)MhLj41

to act upon a simple copy of this order, duly authenticated by the Court Stenographer/sheristedar of this Court. Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 13, 8 - Complaint against Notary - Cognizance of - If the allegations show that the … as notary. The allegations may be in respect of his misconduct and therefore, in view of provisions of Section 13 of the Notary Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as Act for convenience), the learned Magistrate should not have

Sri Kashi Prasad Saksena Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 311(1) and 311(2); Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 4, 5, 5(2), 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13(12), 15 and 15(2); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : AIR1967All173; (1967)IILLJ588All

him and asked the District Judge, Lucknow, who is a competent authority under the rules framed under the Notaries Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), (o make an enquiry. The District Judge framed the following three charges … of Madras. the Judicial Committee had to consider as to what does the expression 'professional misconduct' occurring in Section 13 of the Legal Practitioners Act mean. Their Lordships observed:'Before dealing with the charges it is right to state

Md. Moynul Hoque, Baladmari and Another Vs. The State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

been charged under Sections 120B/ 34 IPC. It is submitted by him that Section 13 of the Notary Act, 1952 provides that no Court shall take cognizance of any offence committed by a Notary in the exercise of … an Affidavit (Annexure – VII) and a Marriage Agreement (Annexure – VIII) and the petitioner No. 2 had notarized the documents on being identified by the petitioner No. 1. According to Mr. Sarma, admittedly the principal accused

V. Ranga Ramu Vs. State by Rajajinagar Police, Bangalore

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 13; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

Reported in : 1999(2)ALT(Cri)82; 1999CriLJ561; 1999(2)KarLJ420

to this petitioner. In support of his argument, he also drew my attention to Section 13 of the Notaries Act, 1952 (for short, 'the Act'). The learned S.P.P. fairly and rightly submitted that these petitions will have to be

Kashi Prasad Saksena Vs. State Government of U.P., Lucknow

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 5, 8(1) and 10; Notaries Rules, 1956 - Rule 11(2), 11(9), 13, 13(12) and 13(13); Constitution of India - Article 226; Stamp Act, 1899 - Schedule - Article 42

Reported in : AIR1969All195

the State Government on 11th March 1964 issued a notification purporting to be under Section 10 of the Notaries Act, 1952 read with Clause (b) of Sub-rule (12) of Rule 13 of the Notaries Rules, 1956 cancelling with effect

K. Vishnu Vs. Government of A.P. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 15; Notaries Rules, 1956 - Rule 13(12)

Reported in : 2000(6)ALD285; 2000(6)ALT219

some cases'.3. Therefore, he was directed to state why action should not be taken underthe Provisions of the Notaries Act, 1952 and the Notaries Rules, 1956 for the said irregularities committed by the petitioner and asked him to submit … and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue, let us go to the legal position bearing on the subject.8. Section 3 of the said Act empowers either the Central Government or the State Government to appoint as notaries … for the following loss of revenue to the Government:1. Document No.323/87 Rs. 13.002. Document No.88/87 Rs. 300.003. DocumentNo.219/87 Rs. 610.004. Document No.41 /87 Rs.2590.00 Total

Mohammed ZulfekharuddIn Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : MRTP

notary and if it is found so, he is liable to be punished. The Notaries Act, 1952 contains Section 13 which deals cognizance of the offence. Said section reads as under:- 13. Cognizance of offence.- (1) No court … is an Advocate. He was appointed as Notary on 11th January, 1988 pursuance to the provisions of The Notaries Act, 1952 and The Notaries Rules, 1956. Lastly, the Government of Maharashtra vide communication dated 2nd February, 2010 addressed to

Central Bureau of Investigation, Bank Securities and Fraud Cell Vs. Mu ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 8; Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 - Sections 9(4); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154, 161, 313, 315, 345 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21, 109, 120-B, 405, 409, 411, 420, 467, 468 477 and 1208; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 8, 9, 10, 74, 76, 78, 105 and 114; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(2); Indian Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1958 - Sections 2 and 19; Reserve Bank of India, 1934 - Sections 45-I; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 5, 11(1), 21 and 35; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960; Indian Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 234, 235, 240 and 242(1); Constitution of India

Reported in : 1999(3)BomCR189

happened to be a member of the Bar and has also been appointed as a Notary under the Notaries Act, 1952. Section 8 of the said Act lays down functions of Notaries which includes as per Clause l(e) thereof 'administer … accused named in the said F.I.R. under section 120B I.P.C. r/w 409, 420, 467, 468 I.P.C. and section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of P.C. Act and substantive offences under section 409, 420, 467, 468-I.P.C. and section 13(2) r/w

V.Ramakrishnan Vs. State Through Its

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

the affidavit was done in exercise or purported exercise of power and functions of the notaries under the Notaries Act, 1952, the prosecution launched without following the procedure contemplated under Section 13 of the Notaries Act, 1952 was not

Shubhakaran Muralidharji Dhanuka Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 5(2)

Reported in : 2004(1)ALLMR899; 2004(2)BomCR571; 2004(1)MhLj14

as an Advocate in the year 1968. The petitioner came to be appointed as a Notary under the Notaries Act, 1952 by the respondent No. 1 for Aurangabad district on 31-8-1988. The petitioner has been practising as a Notary … neither applied for renewal nor paid the prescribed fees of Rs. 500/- for such renewal, as required under Section 5(2) of the Notaries Act, 1952 read with Rule 9 of the Notaries Rules, 1959 vide entries at … on 17-8-2002. However, abruptly the said letter dated 5-8-2002 was cancelled on 13-8-2002. On the same day i.e. on 13-8-2002, a show cause notice was