Advanced Search Results
Kiritsinh D. Rathod Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Gujarat
Mar-14-2007
Civil
Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 10; Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005; Constitution of India - Article 226; Notaries Rules, 1956 - Rules 3, 4, 6, 6(1), 6(2), 7 and 7(3)
(2007)3GLR2173
Rules, 1956. There is no disqualification attached to respondent No. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader also pointed out Section 10 of the Notaries Act, 1952, Rule 3 of the Notaries Rules, 1956 as well as the procedure for … for the petitioner submitted that the respondent authorities have not followed the procedure as laid down under the Notaries Act, 1952, and the Notaries Rules, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act, 1952' and 'the Rules, 1956'). Learned Counsel
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKashi Prasad Saksena Vs. State Government of U.P., Lucknow
Allahabad
Dec-03-1968
Civil
Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 5, 8(1) and 10; Notaries Rules, 1956 - Rule 11(2), 11(9), 13, 13(12) and 13(13); Constitution of India - Article 226; Stamp Act, 1899 - Schedule - Article 42
AIR1969All195
the State Government on 11th March 1964 issued a notification purporting to be under Section 10 of the Notaries Act, 1952 read with Clause (b) of Sub-rule (12) of Rule 13 of the Notaries Rules, 1956 cancelling with effect
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Govt. of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Kashi Prasad Saksena
Allahabad
Jan-29-1969
Civil
Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 10; Legal Practitioners Act, 1879 - Sections 13
AIR1969All363
Oak, C.J.1. This special appeal arises out of a proceeding under the Notaries Act 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). Kashi Prasad Saxena, respondent, was enrolled as a Notary public in the … proved. On receiving that report from the competent authority, the State Government issued a notification on 11-3-1964 under Section 10 of the Act cancelling the certificate of practice granted to Kashi Prasad Saxena. He was perpetually debarred from
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sri Kashi Prasad Saksena Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Allahabad
Sep-06-1966
Civil
Constitution of India - Articles 226, 311(1) and 311(2); Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 4, 5, 5(2), 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13(12), 15 and 15(2); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908
AIR1967All173; (1967)IILLJ588All
him and asked the District Judge, Lucknow, who is a competent authority under the rules framed under the Notaries Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), (o make an enquiry. The District Judge framed the following three charges … or negligence on the part of the petitioner-appellant with the result that the case did not fall under Section 10 of the Act.8. It has also been contended that inasmuch as three charges were framed, and it is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Vishnu Vs. Government of A.P. and Others
Andhra Pradesh
Sep-11-2000
Constitution
Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 15; Notaries Rules, 1956 - Rule 13(12)
2000(6)ALD285; 2000(6)ALT219
some cases'.3. Therefore, he was directed to state why action should not be taken underthe Provisions of the Notaries Act, 1952 and the Notaries Rules, 1956 for the said irregularities committed by the petitioner and asked him to submit … Act. Section 8 prescribes the functions of notaries. Section 9 bars his practice without the Certificate of Practice. Section 10 gives power to the Government to remove the name of the notary from the Register maintained by it
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP. John Samuel Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Its Secretary to Gover ...
Chennai
Sep-21-2004
ConstitutionCivil
Constitution of India - Article 226; Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 10; Notaries Rules, 1956 - Rules 11(8) and 13(4A),
AIR2005Mad39; 2004(4)CTC755
Practice as Notary and perpetually de-barred the petitioner from practising as Notary and under Section 10(d) of the Notaries Act, 1952 the petitioner's name has been removed from the Registry of the Notaries and hence, the petitioner has come
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKamal Lochan Panda and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.
Orissa
Oct-24-2000
Civil
Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 3, 5, 8 and 10; Notaries Rules, 1956 - Rules 3, 4, 6 and 7; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
94(2002)CLT151
is that, Opp. party No. 1 has been making appointment of Notaries, contrary to the provisions of the Notaries Act, 1952 and the Notaries Rules, 1956 according to its sweet will. It is alleged that in spite of objection … further renewal as contemplated under Section 5(2). Functions of the Notaries are enumerated under Section 8 thereof and Section 10 contemplates the grounds on which the names of a Notary can be removed from the Register.5. Rule 3
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOm Prakash JaIn and Another Vs. Union of India and Others
Delhi
Jul-28-1993
Constitution
Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 3, 8, 10, 14 and 15; Constitution of India - 226; Notary Rules, 1956 - Rule 10; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
AIR1994Delhi59; 1994(28)DRJ171
as a Notary by the Government of India and was registered as such under S. 5 of the Notaries Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). P.Y. Bhagat, petitioner No. 2 was appointed as a Notary by Delhi … the translation of, any document from, one language into another; (i) any other act which may be prescribed.' Section 10 relates to the grounds, on which the name of any Notary can be removed from the register. Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Ramanarayanan Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Secretary to Gove ...
Chennai
Mar-24-1997
Civil
The Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 3, 5, 10 and 15
1997(2)CTC443
J1. Petitioner is a practising Advocate. He was appointed by the State Government as a Notary under the Notaries Act 1952 on 25.10.1989. At the expiry of the period of three years from that date, his certificate of practice … fee, if any, be entitled to have his certificate of practice renewed for three years at a time.7. Section 10 of the Act provides for removal of notaries from the Register. That Section reads as under:-Section 10. Removal
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNityananda Behera Vs. State of Orissa and anr.
Orissa
May-15-1996
Consumer
Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 3, 5, 8 and 10; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 10; Notaries Rules, 1956 - Rule 10; Government Servant's Conduct Rules
AIR1997Ori1; 1997(II)OLR207
public, but only for the limited purposes of performing functions under that Act. The object of enacting the Notaries Act, 1952 (in short 'the Notaries Act') was to empower theCentral and State Governments to appoint notaries not only for … full-time office of the President, Consumer Forum.By a notification dated 3-4-1995 issued under Sub-sections (I) and (IA) of Section 10 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, 'the Act'), petitioner was designated as President of the District
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »