Advanced Search Results

Tummala Tirumala Rao Vs. Pemmasani Laxmaiah

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) 1908 - Sections 102; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 16(1) and 16(2); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 5 and 6; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 87 and 118

Reported in : 2004(3)ALT522; I(2005)BC125

short referred to as 'Code'?(2) Whether the Court below had appreciated the presumption under Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 in proper perspective in the facts and circumstances of the case in relation to Ex. A-1?(3) Whether Ex. … the Second Appeal arose answers the description mentioned in Section 102. Since Section 102 is made applicable by Section 97(3) of the Amendment Act to pending proceedings including appeals, it follows that the Second Appeal filed against the

Somwati vs Suresh Jain

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

3480/2021 and 3481/2021 (hereafter ‘impugned orders’) whereby the complaints filed by the petitioners under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 were adjourned sine die after allowing applications of the respondent under Sections 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy … a company, to declare him/her as insolvent, is to be disposed of by following the procedures in Sections 97 to 119. The application filed under Section 94 is scrutinised by the resolution professional and a report is

Rakesh Bhanot versus M/S. Gurdas Agro Pvt. Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]4S.C.R.573

upon the appellants filing applications u/s.94 IBC. Headnotes† Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - ss.94 and 96 - Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - ss.138 and 141 - Moratorium - Interim moratorium - Complaint u/s.138 NI Act upon failure of the … these appeals are filed against the orders passed by different High Courts, which dismissed the petitions filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 1 and thereby affirmed the orders passed by the trial Court … SCC 258; State Bank of India v. V. Ramakrishnan [2018] 10 SCR 974 : (2018) 17 SCC 394; Dena Bank v. Bhikhabhai Prabhudas Parekh and

Omway Build Estate Private Limited and Anr Vs. Ravi Sharma

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

was passed in the complaint filed by the complainant/respondent for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The relevant extract of the complaint is reproduced hereinabove: "2. That the Accused Nos.2 and 3 are the

Neelam Goyal Vs. Satyendra Jain

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

was passed in the complaint filed by the complainant/respondent for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The relevant extract of the complaint is reproduced hereinabove: "2. That the Accused Nos.2 and 3 are the

Neelam Goyal Vs. Ravi Sharma

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

was passed in the complaint filed by the complainant/respondent for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The relevant extract of the complaint is reproduced hereinabove: "2. That the Accused Nos.2 and 3 are the

Peter Devid Xavier Pinto Vs. Dinesh M. Ranawat and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the alleged Accused, the recording of evidence has commenced ' as envisaged in Section 145(2)' of the Negotiable Instruments act, 1881, will proceedings continue at that place. To clarify, regardless of whether evidence has been led before the Magistrate … 138, 145(1), 145(3) – Cases Referred: 1. Deshrath Rupsingh Rathod V/s. State of Maharashtra and Anr. 2014(9) Scale 97 (Para 7). 2. K.Bhaskaran Vs. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan, (1999) 7 SCC 510 (Para 7).

Mr.M.Palanichamy. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 138,; Code of Code of Criminal Procedure - Section 482, 177, 178, 179, 156(3); , 202Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227

of Declaration and set at naught the proceedings initiated on a private complaint under the provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, before the criminal court outside the territorial jurisdiction of the Madras High Court is the moot question raised … the case of the petitioner that suppressing the same, the advertising company has filed a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, on the file of Learned 62nd Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Dada, Mumbai, … Vs. The Learned Metropolitan Magistrate 28th Court, reported in 1992 (1) Crimes 973 (Cal), and Sadanandan Bhadran Vs. Madhavan Sunil Kumar, reported in (1998) 6

Smt. M. Sivakami Vs. Bharat Ginning and Oil Mill Factory

Court : Gujarat

Subject : BankingCriminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138, 141 and 141(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

Reported in : 2000CriLJ1043

Bharat Ginning and Oil Mill Factory and Jalaram Industries in the respective petitions under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The said application was rejected and hence the petition.2. The quashing of the complaint is sought in exercise … in charge. Mr. Shah has pressed in service the following decisions :(1) N. Doraisamy v. Archana Enterprises [1999] 97 Comp Cas 129 (Mad) ;(2) Sharda Agarwal v. Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate [1993] 78 Comp Cas 123 (All)

Mrs. Sonia Bhalla and ors. Vs. Rajneesh Aggarwal and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : BankingCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 482; ;Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 141

Reported in : 2002CriLJ3053

proceedings initiated against them by the complainant-respondent No. 1 for their prosecution for the offence under Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.2. Respondent No. 2, Messrs Bhalla Techtran Industries Limited, having its registered office at 116, Jorbagh, New Delhi-110003 is