Advanced Search Results

Hammanna S. Nayak Vs. Vijay Kumar Kalani and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalBanking

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138; Companies Act - Sections 434; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

Reported in : 2000CriLJ4438

Magistrate, 33rd Court, Ballard Estate, against the present respondent Nos. 1 and 2 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. 3. The complainant/Harnmanna S. Nayak in his complaint dated 14th July, 1992, had averred that he was working

Mamatadevi Prafullakumar Bhansali Vs. Pushpadevi Kailashkumar Agrawal ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 7, 8, 9, 14, 15, 26, 27, 138, 142, 145 and 146; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 200; Evidence Act, 1882 - Sections 59, 60, 62 and 118; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act - Sections 20(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 3, Rule 2; Power of Attorneys Act, 1866; Power of Attorneys (Amendment) Act, 1882; Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act, 2002

Reported in : II(2006)BC155; 2005(2)MhLj1003

transactions, looses all ground whatsoever.31. The petition does not call for any interference. Rule is accordingly discharged. [A] Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 138 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 200 - Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section … to be by direct evidence under Sections 59 and 60 thereof. It is, therefore, considered necessary to quote Section 60 of Evidence Act for its ready reference :--'60. Oral evidence must be direct. -- Oral evidence must, in

S. Arumugham Vs. Srinivasan

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

whereby and whereunder the Respondent / Accused was convicted in respect of an offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and was imposed with a punishment of three years Simple Imprisonment and he was further directed to pay

S.p. Mani And Mohan Dairy Vs. Dr. Snehalatha Elangovan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

appeal is at the instance of the original complainant of a complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short, “the NI Act”) and is directed against the order passed by the High Court of Madras … accounts. As per accounts maintained by the complainant, the accused have to pay a balance of Rs. 10,71,434. 60/­ to the complainant. In order to discharge the part of the said balance amount and liability the accused

Kirlampudi Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. G. Venkata Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 47

Reported in : 2003(2)ALT550; [2003]114CompCas563(AP); [2003]42SCL798(AP)

elaborating his submissions had drawn my attention to Sections 4, 7, 26, 27, 28 and 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and also to Sections 47 and 147(1)(c) of Companies Act, 1956. The learned Counsel further submitted that a … cannot be fastened with the liability. The learned Counsel further elaborating his submissions had drawn my attention to Sections 4, 7, 26, 27, 28 and 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and also to Sections 47 … Visvonata Raghunath Audi v. Mariana Colaco AIR 1976 Goa, Daman and Diu 60. The learned Counsel also further had submitted that at any rate inasmuch

Punjab and Sindh Bank Vs. Vinkar Sahakari Bank Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalBanking

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 4, 5, 17, 50, 85A, 118, 131, 131A, 138 and 142; Bills of Exchange Act, 1882 - Sections 3, 60 and 82

Reported in : 2001VIIAD(SC)537; AIR2001SC3641; 2001(4)ALLMR(SC)474; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)55; [2001]107CompCas208(SC); (2001)4CompLJ188(SC); 2002CriLJ93; JT2001(8)SC22; 2001MPLJ580(SC); RLW2001

the drawer bank. The holder thereof (Punjab and Sindh Bank) filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short 'the Act'). The drawer bank and its officials have been arraigned as accused in the complaint. … Exchange Act 1882. While holding that such a draft is not a cheque within the meaning of Sections 60 and 82 of the said Act Lord Lindley made the following observations in Capital and Counties Bank vs.

Omanakuttan Pillai Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 to 142; Constitution of India - Article 21; Banking, Public Financial Institutions and Negotiable Instruments Laws (Amendment) Act, 1988; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 51 - Order 21, Rule 37; General Clauses Act - Sections 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 60

Reported in : 2001(1)ALT(Cri)109; [2002]108CompCas503(Ker)

in this Criminal Revision Petition. Is a Magistrate justified in awarding rigorous imprisonment under S. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short, 'the Act')? It is profitable to extract the said Section as such before analysing the above … and Order 21 Rule 37 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Section 3 of General Clauses Act and Section 60 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Magistrate can award rigorous imprisonment in case of dishonourment of cheque due

M/S Somani Worsted Private Limited vs.aez Infratech Pvt. Ltd. & Or ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

filed by the petitioner herein indicates that they were all instituted under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 in the year 2012 and are against AEZ Infratech Pvt. Ltd., the respondent no.1, its Managing Director, Shri … perusal of the complaints that were filed by the petitioner herein indicates that they were all instituted under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 in the year 2012 and are against AEZ Infratech

K. Ramachandra Rao and ors. Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by Public Prosecuto ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 7, 9, 138, 139, 142 and 143 to 147; Powers of Attorney Act, 1882 - Sections 2; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 183; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 5, 39, 142, 190, 190(1) 190(2) 192, 195 to 199, 200, 313 and 313(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 60; Negotiable Instruments (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2002; General Clauses Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 202, 497 and 498

Reported in : 2005(2)ALT607; III(2005)BC111; 2005(2)CTC417; [2005(3)JCR390(AP)]

Secunderabad, filed Criminal Petition No. 2332 of 2002 to quash the proceedings against him under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (the Act), on the ground that the complaint against him, presented by the General Power of Attorney of … 200 Cr.P.C.8. The contention of the other learned counsel appearing for the accused is that since as per Section 60 of the Evidence Act, 1872, oral evidence must be direct and since the power of attorney cannot have

Mr. Rushabh Shramik Masturlal vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

in the absence of any statutory provision to this effect. One such example is Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. In Aneeta Hada [Aneeta Hada v. Godfather Travels & Tours (P) Ltd., (2012) 5 SCC 661 : (2012) … THIS THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE R THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6041 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS) BETWEEN: MR. RUSHABH SHRAMIK MASTURLAL S/O SHRAMIK MASTURLAL, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, MANAGING