Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: negotiable instrument act section 138 · Page 1 of about 30,450 results (0.110 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 29 1992

Rakesh Nemkumar Porwal Vs. Narayan Dhondu Joglekar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-29-1992

Subject : CompanyCriminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138, 139 and 142; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 178

Reported in : 1994(3)BomCR355; [1993]78CompCas822(Bom); 1993CriLJ680; 1993(1)MhLj630

the dishonour has taken place as being wholly irrelevant. Black's Law Dictionary defines 'dishonour' in relation to a negotiable instrument as being a situation whereby 'payment is refused or cannot be obtained'. 21. A clear reading of section … which are of some consequence having regard to the fact that they concern the ambit and scope of section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. This recently introduced proviso of law was specially placed on the statute

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 28 1958

Heerachand Vs. Jeevraj and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-28-1958

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 118; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100-101

Reported in : AIR1959Raj1

type of cases where the court comes to the finding that the evidence of the maker of the negotiable instrument as to failure of consideration is untrustworthy and also the evidence of the plaintiff fails to carry conviction … consideration which may be applied as principle of equity, justice and good conscience in the absence of the Act. Section 118(a) has been the subject of innumerable rulings and it is not necessary to refer to them here.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2002

Prashant Vs. S.K. Sarkar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-24-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138 and 142; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 420

Reported in : 2002(2)ALD(Cri)953; 2002BomCR(Cri)672; 2002CriLJ3001; 2002(2)MhLj125

Shinde, learned Counsel for the applicant, contended that the applicant/complainant filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for the sake of brevity, it will be referred as an Act) against the non-applicant in … that the applicant/complainant filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for the sake of brevity, it will be referred as an … be appropriate to consider the scheme of provisions of Section 138 as well as Section 142 of the Act. Section 138 is incorporated in Chapter XVII of the Act which deals with penalties in case of dishonour of certain

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 28 1971

Jaikumar Shivlal Shah and ors. Vs. Motilal Hirachand Gandhi and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-28-1971

Subject : Civil

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 4 and 13; Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(5), 2(22) and 36; Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 Sections 35 and 58

Reported in : AIR1973Bom27; (1972)74BOMLR174; ILR1972Bom816; 1972MhLJ405

to the Amendment Act 8 of 1919, S. 13 of the Negotiable Instruments Act stood thus : -'A `negotiable instrument' means a promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque expressed to be payable to a specified person or … the Indian Stamp Act and would amount to a 'bond' for the purposes of that Act.;Reference under Stamp Act, Section 46 (1884) I.L.R. 8 Mad. 87, F.B. Venku v. Sitaram (1904) I.L.R. 29Bom. 82, s.c. 6 Bom. L.R.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 25 1998

Orkay Industries Limited and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra and O ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-25-1998

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 141; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 227(2), 441(2), 442, 446 and 536(2); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Displaced Persons (Debt Adjustment) Act, 1951 - Sections 20; Social Security Act, 1975; Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963

Reported in : 1998(3)BomCR415; 2000BomCR(Cri)14

petitions the petitioners pray that the proceedings before the Metropolitan Magistrate Courts, under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, be quashed. In some of these petitions a prayer is also made that undertakings given by the … Variava, J.1. By all these petitions the petitioners pray that the proceedings before the Metropolitan Magistrate Courts, under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, be quashed. In some of these petitions a prayer is also made that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 26 1998

Orkay Industries Limited and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra and O ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-26-1998

Subject : CriminalCommercial

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 141; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 441(2) and 536(2); Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 227(2); Displaced Persons (Debt Adjustment) Act, 1951 - Sections 20; Social Security Act, 1975 - Sections 146

Reported in : 2000(5)BomCR14

petitions the petitioners pray that the proceedings before the Metropolitan Magistrate Courts, under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, be quashed. In some of these petitions a prayer is also made that undertakings given by the … Variava, J.1. By all these petitions the petitioners pray that the proceedings before the Metropolitan Magistrate Courts, under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, be quashed. In some of these petitions a prayer is also made that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 1993

Bratindranath Banerjee, Director, Standard Chartered Bank Vs. Hiten P. ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-28-1993

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Special Courts Act, 1979 - Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 6, 211, 235(2) and 244; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 118, 138, 139, 142 and 142(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 59, 60, 61, 65, 102, 114 and 115; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23 and 25

Reported in : 1994(4)BomCR237

mentioned facts and circumstances establish that the accused has not committed any offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act . Relying upon the case of Gian Mahtani v. State of Maharashtras, reported in : 1971CriLJ1417 , he

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 27 2005

M. Chandrashekar Rao Vs. V. Kutamba Rao and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-27-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 133, 138 and 139; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 251 and 255(1)

Reported in : 2006CriLJ1399

under the cheques and thereby the accused rendered himself liable for punishment under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 4. On the said allegations, the learned Magistrate took the case on file and issued process to … payment of the amounts due under the cheques and thereby the accused rendered himself liable for punishment under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 4. On the said allegations, the learned Magistrate took the case on file

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 2002

Bandi Pandu Vs. Kola Balaji Varma and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-01-2002

Subject : CriminalBanking

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 156(3), 200 and 482; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 420

Reported in : 2002(2)ALT(Cri)417; II(2003)BC93

200 and 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - petition seeking quashing of complaints under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act and Section 420 of Indian Penal Code - subsequently private complaint under Section 420 filed after filing complaint

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 1956

Abdul Shakur and ors. Vs. Kotwaleshwar Prasad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-08-1956

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 118

Reported in : AIR1956All403

2. If it can be invoked, would circumstances tending to make it doubtful that consideration passed under the negotiable instrument, even though coupled with a denial on the part of the maker of the instrument, suffice to deprive … to this Bench for decision are:'1. Whether the presumption mentioned in Clause (a) of Section 118, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, can be invoked in insolvency proceedings where an alleged debt against the insolvent is called in question

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial