Advanced Search Results

Capt. N. Gopalakrishnan (Retired) Vs. Union of India, Rep by the Secre ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : Service

“3(o) ‘Service matters, in relation to the persons subject to the Army Act 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act 1957 (62 of 1957) and the Air Force Act 1950 (45 of 1950), mean all matters relating … reduced to Rs.1,894/- per month. Hence, the applicant filed Miscellaneous Petition in Writ Petition No.14228 of 2005 to amend the prayer. According to the applicant his pension should be revised on the basis of V CPC and … constituted under Armed Forces Tribunal Act 2007 (Act 55 of 2007). The preamble to the Armed Forces Tribunal Act 2007 reads as follows:- “An Act

Priyanka Omprakash Panwar Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through Its Pri ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Denotified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulations of Issuance and Verification of Caste Certificate) Act, 2000 - Sections 3, 6, 7(1), 8, 10, 10(1), 10(3) and 11; Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Amendment) Act, 1976; Maharashtra Act, 2001 - Sections 10(3); Constitution of India - Articles 142 and 226

Reported in : 2008(2)ALLMR13; 2008(2)BomCR100; 2008(1)MhLj715

status recognised and declared by the Presidential Order under the Constitution as amended by the SC & ST (Amendment) Act, 1976, which is later found to be false. Therefore, the plea of promissory estoppel or equity have no … under Article 226 of the Constitution. By an order dated 7th March 2005, a Division Bench of this Court confirmed the order of the Scrutiny … its judicial review, to see that constitutional goals set down in the Preamble, the Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles of the Constitution, are achieved. … Court in State of Maharashtra v. Milind (2001) 1 SCC 4 a direction was sought for the … Maharashtra. On 24th June 2002. the Petitioner was granted admission to the Mahatma Gandhi Mission Medical College at Navi Mumbai on a reserved seat on the basis of a Caste Certificate granted by the Deputy Collector, Thane.

Kelo Vs. New London

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

al. certiorari to the supreme court of connecticut No. 04-108.Argued February 22, 2005-Decided June 23, 2005 After approving an integrated development plan designed to revitalize … Defence and general Welfare of the United States”); preamble (Constitution established “to promote the general Welfare”). The … Government’s power under the Necessary and Proper Clause to take property “needed for forts, armories, and arsenals, for navy-yards and light-houses, for custom-houses, post-offices, and court-houses, and for other public uses”). For a law to be within … claiming, inter alia, that the taking of their properties would violate the “public use” restriction in the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause. The trial court granted a permanent restraining order prohibiting the taking of the some of the … the rest of the property, refused to sell. Petitioners brought this state-court action claiming, inter alia, that the taking of their properties would violate the … , Fallbrook Irrigation Dist . v. Bradley , 164 U. S. 112 , 158-164. Without exception, the

Kay Kay Embroideries Pvt. Ltd. Represented by Mr. Kishore R. Jagasia V ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and Other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969 - Sections 2(9), 2(11), 2(12), 3(1), 3(2), 21 and 22; ;Factories Act, 1948; ;Payment of Wages Act, 1936; ;Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948; ;Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; ;Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952; ;Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1923; ;Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; ;Minimum Wages Act, 1948; ;Payment of Bonus Act, 1965; ;Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972; ;Employees' Provident Funds and Family Pension Act, 1952; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 226

Reported in : 2006(3)BomCR66; (2006)IIILLJ824Bom

merit a re-examination by a largerBench. II 3. Writ Petition 7671 of 2005 has been argued before the Court as a lead petition and some … present legislation, as it is apparent from its preamble, unlike the several aforesaid Acts, pointed out by … elucidated in order to appreciate the controversy. The Petitioner has a factory at the MIDC Industrial Area, Mahape, Navi Mumbai, in which, according to the Petitioner, job work of embroidery is carried out on cloth supplied by … various labour laws to such workers was impracticable and regulation of their working and other conditions by introducing amendments to the existing labour laws was not possible. The Committee, therefore, after bearing in mind the recommendations of … Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and Other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969; and -(ii) Whether a Mathadi worker who has been engaged directly … Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969; and -(ii) Whether a Mathadi worker who has

Nanda D/O Yadavrao Shankhpale Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through Its ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act of 1956; States Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 3 and 41; Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act 1976; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 8B, 9 and 10; Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 3(3); Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Denotified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of Caste Certificate) Act 2001; Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act - Sections 4(2); Hindu Succession Act 1956 - Sections 8; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 5; Constitution of India - Articles 25 to 30, 141, 142, 226, 340, 341, 342, 366(24) and 366(25)

Reported in : 2007(3)ALLMR401; 2007(3)BomCR555; 2008(1)MhLj581

included Marathwada region of the State of Maharashtra. The Parliament passed the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act of 1956 (Act 63 of 1956) on 25th September 1956, which came into force from 31st August 1956. … at achieving the objective of equality promised to all citizens by the Preamble of our Constitution. At the same time it must also be realised … Mumbai City by a order dated 7-10-2002 informed the President of the Regional Caste Scrutiny Committee Konkan Division Navi Mumbai to cancel the caste certificate obtained by the petitioner by submitting false documents in support of her … (10) Enforcement and Implementation of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, in Re : 2005CriLJ2598 . In this case a writ petition was filed before the Apex … The petitioner in Writ Petition Nos. 2641 of 1992 and 2818 of 2004 is the same i.e.

Union Of India Vs. Air Commodore Nk Sharma

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

commission, appointments, enrolment and conditions of service in respect of persons subject to the Army Act, 1950, the Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950 and also to provide for appeals arising out of orders, … the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution, and would not be restricted by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment which introduced the aforesaid two Articles. In our view, this should have put the matter to rest, and … the promotion board constituted under such new policy?. CONSIDERATION AND CONCLUSION13 The Preamble to the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 reads- “An Act to provide … VERSUS AIR COMMODORE NK SHARMA (17038) ADM/LGL …RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT SANJAY KAROL J., 1. This Civil Appeal, under Section 31(1)1 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act,

Arun Ramchandra Hublikar Vs. Cummins Diesel Sales and Service (I) Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer … Court, Pune, for adjudication. Parties filed their respective pleadings. On 4 November 2005, the Labour Court passed an order of 'No cross' against the Respondent. … carried out by the Respondent Company also need to be noticed. The preamble to the service rules shows that the Respondent was established some time … Oral Judgment: 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Respondent waives service. … of H.R.Adyanthaya v/s Sandoz (India) Ltd., reported in 1994 II C.L.R. 552, took a review of the various amendments to Section 2(s) and the earlier decisions and summarized the position of law as regard the definition of