Advanced Search Results
Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Allahabad
Feb-25-2010
Criminal
the provisions of this Act would apply to the persons who are subject to the Army Act, 1950, Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950. It will also apply to the retired Army personnel, including their dependents, … jurisdiction, as evidenced by Section 256 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956, Section 27 of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Section 26 of Gift Tax Act, 1958, and Section 18 of Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964. Similarly, there are … been answered in paragraphs 77, 79, 80,81, 82, 92, 93, 94, 97, 98, 100 and 101, which are being extracted below:77. To express our opinion
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommander V.S. Batra Vs. Chief of the Naval Staff, Naval Headquarters( ...
Delhi
Jul-27-1998
Service
Constitution of India - Article 227; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 79
1998VAD(Delhi)91; 74(1998)DLT810; 1998(47)DRJ130
There was no conspiracy and the convening of the court martial was barred under Section 79 of the Navy Act, 1957.3. On the 29th of September, 1997, the Director of Personnel Services wrote the petitioner stating that since the … to the conclusion. This Court found no reason to attribute a restricted meaning to the word 'trial' in Section 98 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. In the light of the above discussion, we hold that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.C. Shibu Vs. Union of India, Represented by Secretary to the Governm ...
Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi
May-19-2011
Land Acquisition
08° 19.62'N 73° 03.4'E off Minicoy island and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 55(2) of the Navy Act 1957. ii. Charge 2. Between 25th day of November 2003 and 29th day of November 2003 contravene Regulation 1331 … Sections 93 to 97 deal with power of Court-Martial, constitution of disciplinary courts etc. Chapter XII comprising Sections 98 to 146 deal with the procedure of Court-Martial. Chapter XV comprising Sections 160 and 161 deal with Judicial
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Umesh Kumar Singh Vs. the Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Eastern Na ...
Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai
Jan-05-2012
MRTP
thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.2) Did at about 19.20 hours on the 4th day of June, 1998 wrongfully confine Shri N.K.Marwaha, Branch Manager … of chance prints in Cr.No.34/1998, under section 392 IPC of Malkapuram Crime Police Station, Visakhapatnam.Exhibit P-42 CNO 68/SOC/SD/VSP/City 98 dated 05.6.1998 being Report of the FPSI on the examination of scene in Cr.No.34/98.Exhibit P-43 CNO 68/SOC/SD/VSP/98 dated
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India and Others Vs. R.P. Yadav
Supreme Court of India
May-10-2000
ServiceContract
Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 3(20), 11, 14(1), 15, 16, 17, 18, 41 and 184(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Contract Act - Sections 18, 19; Indian Contract Act, 1982 - Sections 18(1)
AIR2000SC2252; JT2000(6)SC371; 2000(4)SCALE600; (2000)5SCC325; [2000]Supp1SCR196; (2000)3UPLBEC2174
In our view the answer to the first question rests on the interpretation of relevant provisions of the, Navy Act, 1957, the Navy (Discipline and Misc. Provision) Regulation 1965 and Navy Order No. Str. 17 of 1994 regarding re-engagement … Misc. Provision) Regulation 1965 and Navy Order No. Str. 17 of 1994 regarding re-engagement of 'Sailors' (RP/0805/93). In Section 3(20) 'sailor' is defined as a person in the naval service other than an officer. In Section 11, … on the above question.3. In the appeal arising from SLP (C) No. 9839 of 1999, the respondent R. P. Yadav has already been released from
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChandrasekharasharma Vs. C. Krishnaiah Chetty
Karnataka
Mar-07-2012
Labour and Industrial
Constitution Of India - Articles 226, 227; Industrial Disputes Act - Section 3, 1947 - Sections 10(1)(c), 2(s), 2(oo)(bb), 2(b), 2(rr); andhra pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, 1988 - section 48(1); Sales Act - Section 1(4); Dock Workers Act 1948 - Section 5A; Sales Promotion Employees (Conditions of Service) Act, 1976 ; Workmen's Compensation Act. 1923; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 Maternity Benefit Act, 1961; Payment of Bonus Act. 1965; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Navy Act 1934; Plantation Labour Act, 1951 - Section 2; Industrial Disputes (ID) Act; Amending Act 1982;
the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950, (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee … in full and final settlement of accounts. Petitioner was also informed that this action was in accordance with section 2(oo)(bb) of Industrial Disputes Act. Aggrieved by the said action petitioner raised a dispute before the Labour Commissioner
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV.G. Pillai Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Guwahati
Jun-12-2007
Criminal
Central Government may make rules consistent with this Code and the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) and the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), and any other law, relating to … sentenced to suffer R.I. for 2 years and also dismissed from service for committing a civil offence under Section 46 of the BSF Act, i.e. to say committing rape, an offence punishable under Section 376 IPC. The
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahabir Parshad vs.m/s Kanhaiya Lal Sri Ram
Delhi
Oct-25-2018
Labour and Industrial
the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … the effect that the petitioner was not a “workman”, within the meaning of the expression as defined in Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as “the ID Act”), was also raised by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJetlite (India) Ltd. Vs. Capt. R. Khosla
Delhi
Jan-07-2009
Service
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 27, 33C and 33(C)(2); Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Constitution of India - Article 226
157(2009)DLT677
the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee … forced to serve him with a show cause notice on 5th June, 98 from G.M. Operation, North, and he was asked to show cause within … appointed in Sahara Airlines on the post of Pilot and as per the definition of workman envisaged under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, the respondent cannot be held to be a workman. Counsel has further
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSikand and Company Vs. State of H.P. and ors.
Himachal Pradesh
Apr-27-2007
Labour and Industrial
[2007(115)FLR465],2007(2)ShimLC49
the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee … and the earlier order be modified. This application being CMP No. 669/ 98 was rejected and the Division Bench of this Court came to the … employee is a workman within the meaning of Workmen's Compensation Act. The definition of workman is contained in Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 which reads as follows:2(s) 'workman' means any person (including an apprentice)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »