Advanced Search Results

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

the provisions of this Act would apply to the persons who are subject to the Army Act, 1950, Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950. It will also apply to the retired Army personnel, including their dependents, … jurisdiction, as evidenced by Section 256 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956, Section 27 of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Section 26 of Gift Tax Act, 1958, and Section 18 of Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964. Similarly, there are … particular Tribunal is challenged) by overlooking the jurisdiction of the concerned Tribunal. 96. The directions issued by us in respect of making the decisions of

Umesh Kumar Singh Vs. the Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Eastern Na ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : MRTP

thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.2) Did at about 19.20 hours on the 4th day of June, 1998 wrongfully confine Shri N.K.Marwaha, Branch Manager … Martial found the applicant guilty of the charges. The applicant was awarded a sentence of Rigorous Imprisonment for 96 calendar months and to be dismissed with disgrace from the Naval service. The applicant applied for judicial review

M. Sanjay and Another Vs. Union of India, Represented by Its Secretary ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Subject : Education

has indulged in malpractice during an examination will in addition to the punishment awarded under Section 74 of Navy Act, 1957, will forefit his candidature and be debarred by administrative authority concerned from appearing in two successive examination in

Union of India and Ors. Vs. Major General Shri Kant Sharma and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

commission, appointments, enrolment and conditions of service in respect of persons subject to the Army Act, 1950, the Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force At, 1950 and also to provide for appeals arising out of orders, findings or … of 2013 are allowed and the Civil Appeal Nos.7338 of 2013 and 96 of 2014 are dismissed. .............................................................................. ......J.(SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA) .............................................................................. ...J.(N.V. RAMANA) NEW … JUDGMENT SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J In these appeals the question raised is whether the right of appeal under Section 30 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the 'ct'), against an order of

Asoke Chowdhury and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : West Bengal Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 22B, 28, 38, 65, 67, 68(3), 69, 96, 96(1), 96(2), 96(4), 107, 111, 138, 159, 176, 211 and 212; ;West Bengal Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 - Rules 88A, 88B and 270(1); ;West Bengal Motor Vehicles (Second Amendment) Rules, 2005; ;Constitution of India - Article 19 and 19(1)

Reported in : AIR2007Cal176

amended Rule 88B was framed in exercise of the power of the State Government to make rule under Section 96 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The relevant Act under Chapter V and heading 'Control of Transport Vehicles' … vehicle conforms to the said colour specifications.Type of Vehicle prescribed colourCONTRACT CARRIAGE(Metered Taxi)Mustard yellow body with 10 cm NavyBlue from Headlight to backlight onthe both sides. The word Taxi shallbe inscribed on the center of thedriver's door

Employees' Union Ordnance Factory and Ors. Vs. State of M.P. and Anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Direct TaxationConstitution

Acts : Army Act, 1950; ;Air Force Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Trades, Callings and Employments Act, 1975 - Sections 27 and 27A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 276; Central Civil Services Control and Appeal Rules; Madhya Pradesh Vrittikar Adhiniyam, 1995 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2), 3(3), 4 and 6

Reported in : 2000(1)MPHT496; 2000(1)MPLJ514

to say, to whom the provisions of the Army Act, 1950, the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957 apply serving in any part of the State.'The Division Bench took note of the non-obstante provision in the … entitled to any relief. A stand has also been taken that the word 'employee' has been defined under Section 2(c) of the Act and the likes of the petitioners come under the ambit and sweep of that

Ht Media Limited vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … issued by the Deputy Labour Commissioner, New Delhi District, the size of the powers conferred, upon him, by Sections 10(1)(c) and 12(5) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as “the ID Act”), referring the … law was summarised as under in Ajit Kumar Barat : (SCC pp. 96-97, para7) to its notice “(1) The appropriate Government would not be justified

Ex-Surgeon Commander Bhaskar Roy vs Shri Devender Singh

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Indian Penal Code, 1860(hereinafter referred to as “IPC”) and under Section 68, 74 and 77(2) of The Navy Act, 1957, which culminated in Appellant being sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 24 months, vide Order dated 29.11.1995. Pursuant … in re- filing the appeal is condoned.3. The application stands disposed of. RFA 1163/2025:4. Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908(hereinafter referred to as “CPC”) has been preferred by the AppellantRFA 1163/2025

Northern Coalfields Limited Vs. Ajanta Deb and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 25F

Reported in : (2001)IIILLJ821Cal

such person-i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 or the Army Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957; or ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of a … from May 3, 1994 and further held that it was a case of retrenchment within the meaning of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act and as such in the absence of any notice under the aforesaid

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

27th August, 1991 passed by Admiral L.R. Ramdas, Chief of the Naval Staff under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 maintaining the conviction of the petitioner on all charges except the charge 20 and reducing the sentence of