Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: navy act 1957 section 92 · Page 1 of about 37 results (0.037 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 25 2010

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-25-2010

Subject : Criminal

the provisions of this Act would apply to the persons who are subject to the Army Act, 1950, Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950. It will also apply to the retired Army personnel, including their dependents, … jurisdiction, as evidenced by Section 256 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956, Section 27 of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Section 26 of Gift Tax Act, 1958, and Section 18 of Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964. Similarly, there are … considered, and they have been answered in paragraphs 77, 79, 80,81, 82, 92, 93, 94, 97, 98, 100 and 101, which are being extracted below:77.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 1998

Commander V.S. Batra Vs. Chief of the Naval Staff, Naval Headquarters( ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-27-1998

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 79

Reported in : 1998VAD(Delhi)91; 74(1998)DLT810; 1998(47)DRJ130

There was no conspiracy and the convening of the court martial was barred under Section 79 of the Navy Act, 1957.3. On the 29th of September, 1997, the Director of Personnel Services wrote the petitioner stating that since the … resort to that section can be had only if trial is understood as including proceedings prior to hearing. Section 92 enacts that the Tribunal shall have powers in respect of various matters which are vested in a Court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 1999

Glaxo India Ltd., a Pharmaceutical Company Vs. Mr. C. Gupta and Anothe ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-13-1999

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10(1) and 25; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10 and 23; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Essential Commodities Act, 1955; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 92-A; Industrial Employment Standing Order Act, 1946; Factories Act, 1948; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 153; M.P. Industrial Relations Act

Reported in : 1999(2)ALLMR482; 1999(3)BomCR401; (1999)2BOMLR758; [1999(82)FLR389]; (1999)IILLJ718Bom; 1999(2)MhLj410

person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Army Act, 1950 or theNavy Act, 1957; or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of a … employee was part of managerial staff and therefore he would not be a workman as per definition under section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Needless to say, according to the employee, he is a workman … Motor Vehicles Act. No fault liability was introduced by way of section 92-A in the old Act, and the incident had happened prior to the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 22 2014

Ex Navy Direct Entry Artificers Association and Others Vs. the Union o ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Decided on : Jan-22-2014

Subject : MRTP

Navy Act, as per his submission. He further brought out that vide Sections 19A and 19B of the Navy Act, 1957 provisions still exist for Indian Naval Reserve Force and hence practice of keeping Sailors in Fleet Reserve on … of 10 years followed by liability to remain 10 years in Fleet Reserve. He further submitted that under Section 14 of the Navy Act, Sailors shall be liable to serve the Indian Navy or the Indian Naval … shall be granted such pension from the date of his transfer. ¦... 92. Reservist pension and gratuity” (1) A reservist who is not in receipt

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2026

Union of India vs Lt Col Mukul Dev

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-23-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Air Force Act 1950 or sentence of death in terms of Section 71 (1) (a) of the Navy Act, 1957, coupled with the factum that the decision of the Tribunal is final in terms of Section 29 of … Shivaji Dayanu Patil v. Vatschala Uttam More30, the Supreme Court held thus:“12. It is thus evident that Section 92-A was in the nature of a beneficial legislation enacted with a view to confer the benefit of expeditious

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 1995

Commopore C.P. George Vs. Chief of Naval Staff

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-08-1995

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 81, 81(1), 82, 82(20), 93 and 94(2)

Reported in : 58(1995)DLT578

are of the view that the Chief of Naval Staff has such a power.(15) Section 81(l)(n) of the Navy Act, 1957 permits other minor punishments which were being imposed by 'custom' to be imposed. Section 82 deals with the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 24 2023

Srirupa Roy Vs. Lalit Kumar

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-24-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

the complainant a monthly maintenance of Rs.59,170.92/- as is admissible under the provisions of Section 31 of the Navy Act, 1957, vide order dated 10.04.2023 issued by the Commander, CDR (P & A). The same reads as under:- “MAINTENANCE

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 1997

P.D. Yadav Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-04-1997

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Navy Pension Rules, 1964 - Rule 15(2)

Reported in : 1997IIAD(Delhi)901; 66(1997)DLT832; 1997(41)DRJ172

M. Jagannadha Rao, J.(1) These two writ petitions arising under the Navy Act, 1957 have been referred to a Full bench for being disposed of Along with Cwp 2813/94, 2866/90 and 4706/94 … 1980. He was charge-sheeted in January 1990 and tried by a General Court Martial on 5 charges under Sections 43, 47 and 48 of the Navy Act, found guilty of the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th charges

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 2013

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-23-2013

Subject : Education

27th August, 1991 passed by Admiral L.R. Ramdas, Chief of the Naval Staff under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 maintaining the conviction of the petitioner on all charges except the charge 20 and reducing the sentence of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 2011

Pradeep Kumar Singh Vs. the Union of India and 2 Others.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-28-2011

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 41(a), 74

desert his place of duty without prior permission, which is a serious offence under Section 41(a) of the Navy Act, 1957; when the appellant was caught by Mr. Pandey and questioned about his presence in the quarter, he ran … appellant was present and the divisional officer Lieutenant Aditya Minhas was present throughout the entire investigation. Further, Regulation 92 of the Regulations, 1965 provides for naval custody till completion of investigation. Therefore, as contended by the learned

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial