Advanced Search Results

Umesh Kumar Singh Vs. the Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Eastern Na ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : MRTP

applicant was under custody for more than 8 days without any Court Martial trial. The principle incorporated in Section 86 of the Navy Act 1957 has been violated. The applicant was arrested on 25.07.1998 and was detained for … thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.2) Did at about 19.20 hours on the 4th day of June, 1998 wrongfully confine Shri N.K.Marwaha, Branch Manager

Dhirendra Kumar Singh and Others Vs. State of A.P. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 4, (2), 5, 428, 437 and 439; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3(22), 77, 78, (1), (2), 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 93, (2), (3), 151 and 184; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 342 and 392; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(1-B)(A) and 27; Air-Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 176; Navy (Discipline and Miscellaneous provisions) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 89 and 92(2)

Reported in : 1999(4)ALD452; 1999(2)ALT(Cri)312; 1999CriLJ4421

applicable in view of the fact that the petitioners are to be proceeded with Court-Martial proceedings under the Navy Act.5. The learned Counsel for the petitioners Mr. Ramanaimirthy for Sri Vasudeva Rao contends that under Section 4 of … no such person shall be detained beyond the said period without authority of such commanding or other officer. Section 86 mandates that the charge made against any person subject to naval law taken into custody shall without any

Union of India and anr. Vs. P.D. Yadav

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964 - Regulation 15(2); Army Act, 1950 - Sections 71 and 73; Constitution of India - Articles 20 to 22 and 300A; Army Rules, 1950 - Rules 14, 14(5) and 15; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 27, 45, 47, 48, 81 and 82; Military Engineer Services Regulations, 1968; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 2-A(4), 3, 4 and 16; Army Pension Act - Sections 16; Financial Regulation, 1983 - Rule 133

Reported in : 2001IXAD(SC)30; [2001(91)FLR961]; JT2001(8)SC617; 2001LabIC4014; 2001(7)SCALE270; (2002)1SCC405; 2001(4)SCT1002(SC); 2002(1)SLJ299(SC); (2002)1UPLBEC118

the said office and to come afterwards and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 47(a) of the Navy Act, 1957. 3. Did on the Twenty ninth day of September one thousand nine hundred eighty nine at about 1402 … Supply Depot, Madras, from M/s. Vickey Enterprises, Madras, contrary to Army HQ letter No. 72312/III/2/SI-4 dated 11 Nov. 86. 3. At Madras between October, 1987 and November, 1987, when DDST HQ ATNKK and G Area, improperly ordered

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

27th August, 1991 passed by Admiral L.R. Ramdas, Chief of the Naval Staff under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 maintaining the conviction of the petitioner on all charges except the charge 20 and reducing the sentence of … No.6563/2011 page 24 o”49. We may also note the authoritative and binding laid down in (1985) SCR (1) 866 SCR Rajinder Kumar Kindra v Delhi Administration wherein the court was concerned with an employee charged with misconduct

Union of India and Ors. Vs. Major General Shri Kant Sharma and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

commission, appointments, enrolment and conditions of service in respect of persons subject to the Army Act, 1950, the Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force At, 1950 and also to provide for appeals arising out of orders, findings or … JUDGMENT SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J In these appeals the question raised is whether the right of appeal under Section 30 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the 'ct'), against an order of

Div. Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. A. Sankaralingam

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2(14), 2B, 25B and 25F; Factories Act - Sections 79; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

Reported in : 2009(1)AWC334(SC); 2008(5)CTC365; [2008(119)FLR398]; [2009(1)JCR86(SC)]; 2008(4)KLT444(SC); (2009)ILLJ602SC; (2009)1MLJ176(SC); (2009)153PLR348; RLW2009(1)SC626; 2008(13)SC

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … Supreme Court in Birdhichand Sharma v. First Civil Judge 1961 II LLJ 86, wherein the Supreme Court in facts and circumstances of the case, found … dated 10th September 1998 held that the claimant before it, was not a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter called the 'Act') as he had worked only as a

John Joseph Khokar Vs. B.S. Bhadange and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Article 227; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions of Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 ; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

Reported in : 1998(2)BomCR174; 1997(3)MhLj907

person :-(i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Army Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957; or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of a prison, … and that needs consideration is: whether the petitioner John Joseph Khokar is a workman within the meaning of section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.2. The said question arises from the facts which briefly stated are:

Kalawati Pandurang Fulzele Vs. Divisional Controller

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 2(14), 3, 3(5), 10(2), 28 and 44; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 25B, 25F and 25G; Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957 - Rule 81; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Sales Promotion Employees (Conditions of Service) Act, 1976 - Sections 2; Contract Labour Act; Labour and Industrial Law; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(1), 15(3), 38, 39, 41, 42, 43, 46, 47 and 227

Reported in : 2007(5)ALLMR80; 2007(5)BomCR177

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee … treated as the one under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.FACTS3. The petitioner filed a complaint under Section 28 read with item (1) of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of

Prabhari Adhikari Nagar Palika and anr. Vs. Ramesh Chandra and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Tribunals) Act, 1976 - Sections 1(4)

Reported in : [1991(62)FLR265]; (1992)ILLJ639All; (1991)1UPLBEC203

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee … the Labour Court, Agra, dated October 23, 1983, in Adjudication Case No. 86 of 1981, seeking relief for issuance of a writ in the nature … to be bad as neither any notice nor any charge-sheet was given to him and the provisions of Section 6-N of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for brevity hereinafter referred to as 'the U.P. Act') were

Brijesh Narayan Vs. Rajasthan State Co-operative Bank Ltd. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 25; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Rajasthan Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1958 - Sections 3

Reported in : RLW2006(1)Raj210

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee … iq= fxj/kjukjk;.k dks izcU/kd laPkkyd] jkt- LVsV dkWijsfVo cSad fy- iks- ckWDl 86] usg: cktkj] t;iqj ,oa 'kk[kk izcU/kd] jkt- LVsV dkWijsfVo cSad fy- fla/kh … assigning any reason. The petitioner alleged that his termination from service w.e.f. 23.11.1992 is retrenchment as defined under Section 2(oo) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1947') and the same