Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: navy act 1957 section 83 · Page 1 of about 30 results (0.014 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 23 2013

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-23-2013

Subject : Education

27th August, 1991 passed by Admiral L.R. Ramdas, Chief of the Naval Staff under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 maintaining the conviction of the petitioner on all charges except the charge 20 and reducing the sentence of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 1999

Dhirendra Kumar Singh and Others Vs. State of A.P. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-15-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 4, (2), 5, 428, 437 and 439; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3(22), 77, 78, (1), (2), 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 93, (2), (3), 151 and 184; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 342 and 392; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(1-B)(A) and 27; Air-Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 176; Navy (Discipline and Miscellaneous provisions) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 89 and 92(2)

Reported in : 1999(4)ALD452; 1999(2)ALT(Cri)312; 1999CriLJ4421

'Arrest' makes provisions on various aspects of arrest, detention and custody of the offenders covered by tlie Act. Section 83 of the Navy Act provides for Power of Chief of Naval Staff, every officer in command of a … applicable in view of the fact that the petitioners are to be proceeded with Court-Martial proceedings under the Navy Act.5. The learned Counsel for the petitioners Mr. Ramanaimirthy for Sri Vasudeva Rao contends that under Section 4 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 26 2005

Chairman-cum-managing Director, Fertilizer Corporation of India Limite ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-26-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 2, 2(1), 4(1), 7(4), 7(7), 13, 18 and 103; Payment of Gratuity (Central) Rules - Rules 10(2) and 17; Apprentice Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(9) and 2(22); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Working Journalists (Conditions of Service) Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1965; Payment of Wages Act; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970; Employees Provident Fund Act, 1952; Air force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 67; Labour Law; Indian Contract Act

Reported in : 2005(2)ESC1547

to the Air force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957).39. The legislature has used the word 'means' while defining the words 'employees' and 'wages' used … to a further sum of Rs. 11,987/- towards gratuity, hence each one of them filed an application under Section 7(4) of the Act read with Rule 10(2) of the Rules, before the Controlling Authority/Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central),

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 22 1996

Rejeshwar Mahato Vs. the Eighth Industrial Tribunal, West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-22-1996

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 226, 254 and 254(1);; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2(A) and 10;; Employees State Insurance Act, 1948;; Air Force Act, 1950;; Army Act, 1950;; Navy Act, 1957;; West Bengal Act, 1980;; West Bengal Amending Act, 1984

Reported in : (1998)1CALLT297(HC),[1998(79)FLR406],(1998)IIILLJ777Cal

the Air Force Act. 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act. 1950 (46 of 1950) or the Navy Act 1957 (62 of 1957) or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employees … Ltd, respondent No.3 (hereinafter referred to as the said Company) in its Bailey Jute Mills, Unit in the section (Broad Loom) on a salary of Rs. 325/-permonth.4. It has also been alleged in the petition that the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 09 2013

Smt. Nanda Josh Vs. Union of India

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-09-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

commission, appointments, enrolment and conditions of service in respect of persons subject to the Army Act, 1950, the Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Fore Act, 1950. Sub-section (2) of Section 2 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act specifies

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 2018

Dinesh Pal vs.gnct of Delhi and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-18-2018

Subject : Education

Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950 ), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950 ), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957 ); or W.P.(C) 9829/2018 Page 7 of 8 17. is employed mainly in a managerial … award dated, 19th February, 2018, passed by the Labour Court, on an application filed by the petitioner under Section 37-C (ii) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as “the ID Act”). The petitioner had,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 2009

Battula Veeraswamy Vs. the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and or ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-11-2009

Subject : Service

Acts : Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 1, 3, 5, 5A, 5D, 6, 6C, 6D, 7, 11, 14, 14A, 16, 17(1), 17(1C), 27 and 27A; Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rules 49(1), 50(1) and 50(2); Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1971 ;Constitution of India - Articles 36, 37, 41, 47 and 226; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Civil Service Regulations

Reported in : 2009(6)ALT464

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) ;(f) `Family pension' means `Family Pension, 1964', admissible under Rule 54 but does not include … of qualifying service, subject to a maximum of 161/2 times the emoluments. 83. Date from which pension becomes payable(1) Except in the case of a … The writ petitioner initially joined the services of Accounts Department on 6.11.1959. While he was working as a Section Officer (Accounts), he came on deputation to Mishra Dhatu Nigam Ltd, Hyderabad, a Government of India Undertaking (hereinafter

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 1998

Commander V.S. Batra Vs. Chief of the Naval Staff, Naval Headquarters( ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-27-1998

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 79

Reported in : 1998VAD(Delhi)91; 74(1998)DLT810; 1998(47)DRJ130

There was no conspiracy and the convening of the court martial was barred under Section 79 of the Navy Act, 1957.3. On the 29th of September, 1997, the Director of Personnel Services wrote the petitioner stating that since the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 25 1973

Gosa Vs. Mayden

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-25-1973

Subject : Land Acquisition

discharged in 1946. He instituted suit in 1970, relying on O'Callahan, seeking to compel the Secretary of the Navy to overturn his court-martial conviction for auto theft and to correct his military records with respect to his … question in O'Callahan was the appropriateness of the exercise of jurisdiction by a military forum, pursuant to an Act of Congress, over a nonservice-connected offense when balanced against the guarantees of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. Pp. … civilian counterpart. For example, Art. 32 of the Code, 10 U.S.C. § 832, requires "thorough and impartial investigation" prior to trial, and prescribes for the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 18 1960

Mcelroy Vs. Guagliardo

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-18-1960

Subject : Land Acquisition

entirely inapposite. Page 361 U. S. 285 Those cases permitted trial by courts-martial of paymasters' clerks in the navy. The Court found that such a position was "an important one in the machinery of the navy," the … ] See Army Regulations 600-201, 20 June 1956, as changed 15 March 1957, and Army Regulations 624-200, 19 May 1958, as changed 1 July 1959. … (1957), was binding as to all classes of persons included within the section and that each class was nonseverable. 104 U.S.App.D.C. 112, 259 F.2d 927. … Stat. 13; Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U. S. 83 (1953), there should be no legal objection to … Army and stationed in Berlin, was convicted by a general court-martial on a plea of guilty to three acts of sodomy. While serving his five-year sentence, petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial