Advanced Search Results
Commander Ranvir Kumar Sinha Vs. the Union of India and Others
Mumbai
Dec-19-1990
Criminal
1991(2)BomCR28; 1991CriLJ1729
in the conduct of proceedings before the BOI. This representation, purporting to be under section 23 of the Navy Act, 1957 (the Act), was rejected by the Flag Officer Commanding-in-Chief, Eastern Command, on 21st October 1987. A further representation … ship and to give extra duty without recourse to disciplinary action and thereby committed an offence punishable under section 74 of the Navy Act, 1957.4. Did on 23rd October 1986 contravene para 6 read with paras 1 and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Sanjay and Another Vs. Union of India, Represented by Its Secretary ...
Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi
Mar-25-2011
Education
has indulged in malpractice during an examination will in addition to the punishment awarded under Section 74 of Navy Act, 1957, will forefit his candidature and be debarred by administrative authority concerned from appearing in two successive examination in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEx-surgeon Commander Bhaskar Roy Vs. Union of India and ors.
Mumbai
Oct-17-1997
Labour and Industrial
Navy Act - Sections 81(1)(b) and 82(4); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354
1998(1)MhLj220
was found guilty under section 354, Indian Penal Code and under Sections 68, 77(2) and 74 of the Navy Act, 1957 and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 24 calendar months. He was also dismissed with disgrace from the Naval
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Pradeep Kumar Singh Vs. the Union of India and 2 Others.
Andhra Pradesh
Jul-28-2011
Service
Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 41(a), 74
of Om Prakash Pandey, Electrical Mechanician (Power) 3rd class number 114172-H and thereby committee an offence punishable under Section 74 of the Navy Act, 1957; 3 Did between 23.00 hours on the twenty ninth day of December 1998 … desert his place of duty without prior permission, which is a serious offence under Section 41(a) of the Navy Act, 1957; when the appellant was caught by Mr. Pandey and questioned about his presence in the quarter, he ran
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAvtar Singh Vs. Union of India and Others
Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi
Dec-08-2010
Land Acquisition
are Shrimati Harneet Singh (wife), Amandeep Singh (son) and Amanika Singh (daughter), thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 74 of the Navy Act 1957. With respect to this charge, counsel for the appellant contended that there is … executed whereas, no such modification was carried out, thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 60(a) of the Navy Act 1957. There is no dispute in regard to the fact that the appellant had signed the Work Completion Report
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askibrahim Khan Vs. Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Develop ...
Andhra Pradesh
Aug-21-2001
Service
Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 - Sections 19; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2, 10, 74 and 75; Constitution of India - Article 226; Maternity Benefit Act, 1961; Hyderabad Civil Service Rules - Rule 231; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957
2001(5)ALD619; 2001(5)ALT400
the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … of the Industrial Disputes Act or seek relief, -if possible, under Sections 74 and 75 of the Act.12. Similar aspect of the matter was considered … or not under the Industrial Disputes Act can be effectively decided by the Tribunal in an application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act.2. The petitioner worked as Vehicle Inspector in the Office of Municipal Corporation
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAvtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors
Delhi
Sep-23-2013
Education
27th August, 1991 passed by Admiral L.R. Ramdas, Chief of the Naval Staff under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 maintaining the conviction of the petitioner on all charges except the charge 20 and reducing the sentence of … by the Supreme Court on the scope of judicial review in the judgment reported at (1995) 6 SCC 749, B.C. Chaturvedi v. Union of India wherein a challenge was laid to the proceedings before the disciplinary authority
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.C. Shibu Vs. Union of India, Represented by Secretary to the Governm ...
Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi
May-19-2011
Land Acquisition
08° 19.62'N 73° 03.4'E off Minicoy island and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 55(2) of the Navy Act 1957. ii. Charge 2. Between 25th day of November 2003 and 29th day of November 2003 contravene Regulation 1331 … to do so. Hence the finding of the Court Martial on charge 2 is only to be confirmed. 74. The petitioner had also raised a contention regarding vindictiveness by the authorities towards him in the entire proceedings.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVishnu Dayal Jhunjhunwala and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-18-1984
Commercial
AIR1984SC1346; [1985]57CompCas493(SC); (1984)3CompLJ163(SC); 1984LabIC905; 1984(1)SCALE699; 1984Supp(1)SCC118; [1984]3SCR530; 1984(16)LC1047(SC)
the employment of persons subject to the Army Act, 1950 or the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957- (a) in any public utility service as defined in Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act. 1947, or(b) … High Court in the case of National Projects Construction Corporation Ltd. v. Commissioner of Wealth Tax. Delhi [1969] 74 L. T. R. 465.6. On behalf of the Union of India, it has been submitted that stoppage of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskProsenjit Kundu Vs. the Presiding Officer, General Security Force Cour ...
Delhi
Apr-25-2006
Criminal
Army Act, 1950; Army Rules; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Evidence Act - Sections 32; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 226 and 227; Border Security Force Act - Sections 117(2) and 130; Border Security Force Rules; defense Service Regulations
2006(88)DRJ856
commit any offence are dealt with by the special provisions contained in the Army Act, 1950 or the Navy Act, 1957 or the Air Force Act, 1950 and not by the normal Procedure Code. The said Navy Act is … under:-That as observed by this Court in Cr. W. Nos. 53 and 74 of 1979 decided on 7.4.1981, 'Clause (4) of Article 227 of the … P.4), and the order of the Director General, BSF rejecting the statutory petition filed by the petitioner under Section 117(2) of the Border Security Force Act, and a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »