Advanced Search Results

Union of India and anr. Vs. P.D. Yadav

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964 - Regulation 15(2); Army Act, 1950 - Sections 71 and 73; Constitution of India - Articles 20 to 22 and 300A; Army Rules, 1950 - Rules 14, 14(5) and 15; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 27, 45, 47, 48, 81 and 82; Military Engineer Services Regulations, 1968; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 2-A(4), 3, 4 and 16; Army Pension Act - Sections 16; Financial Regulation, 1983 - Rule 133

Reported in : 2001IXAD(SC)30; [2001(91)FLR961]; JT2001(8)SC617; 2001LabIC4014; 2001(7)SCALE270; (2002)1SCC405; 2001(4)SCT1002(SC); 2002(1)SLJ299(SC); (2002)1UPLBEC118

the said office and to come afterwards and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 47(a) of the Navy Act, 1957. 3. Did on the Twenty ninth day of September one thousand nine hundred eighty nine at about 1402 … cannot be said that on the date of cashiering or dismissal there could be any arrears of pension. Section 73 of the Army Act enables the authorities to impose punishments in combination. Merely because punishment is not imposed

Syed Muneer Raza Vs. Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 13(1), 56, 59, 65, 72, 73, 78 and 142; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21 and 226; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 78, 79 and 105; IRCA - Rule 117; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 78-B

Reported in : 2000(1)ALD689

commit any offence are deait with by the special provisions contained in the Army Act, 1950, or the Navy Act 1957 or the Air Force Act, 1950 and not by the normal Criminal Procedure Code. The said Navy Act … which a statement has been delivered under sub-section (1), the railway servant may detain and examine the goods.10. Section 73 of the Act empowers the Railway administration for punitive charges for overloading, where a person loads goods in

Ex. Commodore Narinder M. Pandit Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 54(2), 60, 77(2), 81 and 82(3); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Army Act - Sections 71 and 73; Navy Pension Regulations - Regulations 15, 15(2) and 16

Reported in : 147(2008)DLT74; 2008(100)DRJ735; 2008(3)SLJ363(Delhi)

and messing was provided at the outstation, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 60(d) of the Navy Act, 1957.(2) Did on 19th Aug 2002 knowingly make a fraudulent statement in a document, namely Temporary Duty Claim CG/3224NM … cannot be said that on the date of cashiering or dismissal there could be any arrears of pension. Section 73 of the Army Act enables the authorities to impose punishments in combination. Merely because punishment is not imposed

Commander Vinod Kumar Jha Versus Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

state. Accordingly, the petitioner was dismissed from service in exercise of its powers of Section 15 of the Navy Act, 1957 read with Regulation 216. An affidavit was also filed by the Chief of Naval Staff Admiral Arun Prakash … Similarly, in the case of A.K. Kaul and Anr. v. Union of India and Anr. [1995 (4) SCC 73] their Lordships relying in the ratio laid down in the case of S.R. Bommai v. Union of India

Commander Ranvir Kumar Sinha Vs. the Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1991(2)BomCR28; 1991CriLJ1729

in the conduct of proceedings before the BOI. This representation, purporting to be under section 23 of the Navy Act, 1957 (the Act), was rejected by the Flag Officer Commanding-in-Chief, Eastern Command, on 21st October 1987. A further representation

Umesh Kumar Singh Vs. the Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Eastern Na ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : MRTP

thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.2) Did at about 19.20 hours on the 4th day of June, 1998 wrongfully confine Shri N.K.Marwaha, Branch Manager … of occurrence he was out of station. The accused/appellant, relying on a Medical Board proceedings AFMSF-16A at Page 732 to Volume-II, would contend that he had undergone a medical check-up on 4th June 1998 ie., the date

K.C. Shibu Vs. Union of India, Represented by Secretary to the Governm ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Subject : Land Acquisition

08° 19.62'N 73° 03.4'E off Minicoy island and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 55(2) of the Navy Act 1957. ii. Charge 2. Between 25th day of November 2003 and 29th day of November 2003 contravene Regulation 1331

V.G. Pillai Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Central Government may make rules consistent with this Code and the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) and the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), and any other law, relating to … Pillai, the appellant herein, was the writ petitioner in Civil Rule No. 73 of 1998 before this Court. In the said Writ Petition, the petitioner … sentenced to suffer R.I. for 2 years and also dismissed from service for committing a civil offence under Section 46 of the BSF Act, i.e. to say committing rape, an offence punishable under Section 376 IPC. The

Indian Nval Canteen Service Employees Un Vs. Union of India

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

regulations were amended with effect from 11/04/1988 and the amended Regulation is Ext.P4(a). e) Section 3(12A) of the Navy Act 1957 defines Naval Establishment as meaning, an establishment belonging to or under the control of Indian Navy whether within

Manoj Kumar (Service No.691785-B) Vs. Union of India, Rep. by its Secr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Service matters ?, in relation to the persons subject to the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) and the Air force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), mean all matters relating to the … to adjudicate the grievance since the petitioner is not covered by definition of Service matters as provided in Section 3(o)(iii) of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (for short, the Act'), and, therefore, this writ petition is