Advanced Search Results

State Vs. Kawas Manekshaw Nanavati

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 75(2), 93 and 307; Constitution of India - Articles 72, 161 and 361; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 3(12), 53(16), 81(1), 82(10), 89(3), 122, 123, and 146; Supreme Court Rules - Order 21, Rule 5

Reported in : (1960)62BOMLR383; 1960CriLJ1558

was willing and ready to take the accused in naval custody as defined in S. 3(12) of the Navy Act, 1957, and that the accused would be detained under the orders of the Naval Provost Marshall in exercise of … pardon is ested in the President and Governors of States by Articles 72 and 161 of the Constitution. Article 72(1) states:'The President shall have the … Chainani, C.J.(1) In Criminal Reference No. 159 of 1959, which was made to this Court under Section 307 Cr. P. C. by the Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, a Division Bench of this Court, consisting of

Syed Muneer Raza Vs. Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 13(1), 56, 59, 65, 72, 73, 78 and 142; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21 and 226; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 78, 79 and 105; IRCA - Rule 117; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 78-B

Reported in : 2000(1)ALD689

commit any offence are deait with by the special provisions contained in the Army Act, 1950, or the Navy Act 1957 or the Air Force Act, 1950 and not by the normal Criminal Procedure Code. The said Navy Act … beyond its permissible carrying capacity as exhibited under sub-section (2) or sub-section (3) ornotified under sub-section (4) of Section 72 of the Act, the Railway administration may, in addition to the freight and other charges, recover from the

The State Of Sikkim Vs. Jasbir Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

the CrPC has empowered the Central Government to make rules consistent with the CrPC and the Army Act, Navy Act 1957 and the Air Force Act 1950 and any other law relating to the Armed Forces of the Union, … in the Act. Chapter VII mentions the various punishments which can be awarded by Court 21 Martial and Section 72 provides that subject to the provisions of the Act a Court Martial may, on convicting a person of

Umesh Kumar Singh Vs. the Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Eastern Na ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : MRTP

thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.2) Did at about 19.20 hours on the 4th day of June, 1998 wrongfully confine Shri N.K.Marwaha, Branch Manager … the Naval Staff. The 2nd respondent in the judicial review had reduced the sentence to Rigorous Imprisonment for 72 calendar months and to be dismissed with disgrace from the Naval Service. The applicant has not exhausted the

P.D. Yadav Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Navy Pension Rules, 1964 - Rule 15(2)

Reported in : 1997IIAD(Delhi)901; 66(1997)DLT832; 1997(41)DRJ172

M. Jagannadha Rao, J.(1) These two writ petitions arising under the Navy Act, 1957 have been referred to a Full bench for being disposed of Along with Cwp 2813/94, 2866/90 and 4706/94 … 1980. He was charge-sheeted in January 1990 and tried by a General Court Martial on 5 charges under Sections 43, 47 and 48 of the Navy Act, found guilty of the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th charges

Union of India and anr. Vs. P.D. Yadav

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964 - Regulation 15(2); Army Act, 1950 - Sections 71 and 73; Constitution of India - Articles 20 to 22 and 300A; Army Rules, 1950 - Rules 14, 14(5) and 15; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 27, 45, 47, 48, 81 and 82; Military Engineer Services Regulations, 1968; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 2-A(4), 3, 4 and 16; Army Pension Act - Sections 16; Financial Regulation, 1983 - Rule 133

Reported in : 2001IXAD(SC)30; [2001(91)FLR961]; JT2001(8)SC617; 2001LabIC4014; 2001(7)SCALE270; (2002)1SCC405; 2001(4)SCT1002(SC); 2002(1)SLJ299(SC); (2002)1UPLBEC118

the said office and to come afterwards and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 47(a) of the Navy Act, 1957. 3. Did on the Twenty ninth day of September one thousand nine hundred eighty nine at about 1402 … (CTC) locally purchased by Supply Depot, Madras, from M/s. Vickey Enterprises, Madras, contrary to Army HQ letter No. 72312/III/2/SI-4 dated 11 Nov. 86. 3. At Madras between October, 1987 and November, 1987, when DDST HQ ATNKK and

Rangorath Gokul Prasad vs the Malabar Devaswom Board

Court : Kerala

is the guardian of the Deity and apart from the jurisdiction under Section 103 of the Land Reforms Act, 1957 viz. the powers of revision, the High Court is having inherent jurisdiction and the doctrine of parents patriae … @ SUSHEELA NAIR, D/O. AMMINI AMMA, NEW HEAVEN CH SECTOR, NO.14, VASHI, NAVI MUMBAI. 33 KUTTAN @ NARAYANANKUTTY, S/O AMMINI AMMA, 004, SARVODAYA KUNJU CO- … Purchase certificate issued from the Land Tribunal No.4, Ottappalam. Ext.P4 is the order of the Land Tribunal under Section 72(f)(5) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1971. It is seen that Panamanna Devaswom Manager was a party to

Srirupa Roy Vs. Lalit Kumar

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the complainant a monthly maintenance of Rs.59,170.92/- as is admissible under the provisions of Section 31 of the Navy Act, 1957, vide order dated 10.04.2023 issued by the Commander, CDR (P & A). The same reads as under:- “MAINTENANCE

K.C. Shibu Vs. Union of India, Represented by Secretary to the Governm ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Subject : Land Acquisition

08° 19.62'N 73° 03.4'E off Minicoy island and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 55(2) of the Navy Act 1957. ii. Charge 2. Between 25th day of November 2003 and 29th day of November 2003 contravene Regulation 1331 … were being done at the direct orders of the Captain. PW.9 has confirmed in his answer to Question 728 that the “Captain was giving him the course to come to depending on the bearing of the vessel”.

Balbir Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 4, 9, 72, 124 and 125; Leave Rules - Rule 9; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3 to 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - +, 1973 - Sections 475; Army Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302 and 325

Reported in : 1995(43)BLJR343; 1994(4)SCALE904; (1995)1SCC90; [1994]Supp5SCR422; 1995(1)LC275(SC)

Central Government may make rules consistent with this Code and the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957), and the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) and any other law, relating to … of the CrPC and Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 (hereinafter the '1952 Rules')11. Section 72 of the Air Force Act (which corresponds to Section 70 of the Army Act) provides as under:72. Civil