Advanced Search Results

Dilawar Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 69, 70, 122(1), 125 and 125(2); ;Navy Act, 1957; ;Air Force Act, 1950; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 192, 213, 243, 244, 245, 247, 248, 254, 484(2), 549 and 549(1); ;Prevention of Corruption Act - Section 5(1) and 5(2); ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 354, 452, 467, 471 and 506; ;Criminal Courts and Court-martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3, 4, 5 and 6; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 475 and 475(1)

Reported in : 2002CriLJ531

Central Government may make rules consistent with this Code and the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950, the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957), and Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), and any other law, relating to the … subject to military law. Therefore, in view of the provisions of Sections 69 and 70 of the Army Act, 1950, the petitioner can be tried … order dated 4-9-2000 whereby a charge has been ordered to be framed against the petitioner and others under Sections 452, 354 and 506, I.P.C. and has been framed on the same day.2. The grievance of the petitioner

Anuj Kumar Dey and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 3(16), 3(17), 3(20), 16, 17 and 184; Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964 - Regulations 2(1), 69(1), 78, 79, 261, 290 and 291

Reported in : 1996IXAD(SC)298; [1997(75)FLR173]; JT1996(10)SC679; 1996(8)SCALE659; (1997)1SCC366; [1996]Supp9SCR269

into the merits of the case, it will be necessary to refer to the relevant provisions of the Navy Act, 1957 and also to some of the Regulations framed under the said Act:THE NAVY ACT, 1957CHAPTER - IPRELIMINARY3. In … hold office during the pleasure of the President.16. Discharge on expiry of engagement.- Subject to the provisions of Section 18, a sailor shall be entitled to be discharged at the expiration of the term of service for … Chapter III of the Regulations deals with SailOrs. In this Chapter, Regulation 69(2) deals with Service Pension and Gratuity of the Sailors, Regulation 78 lays

Sandeep Alias Sanjay Vithal Shinde Vs. the State of Maharashtra,

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 376 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 475 and 475(1); Army Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 69 and 70; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Military Law

Reported in : 2004CriLJ3678

Central Government may make rules, consistent with this Code and the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (65 of 1957), and the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), and any other law, relating to … Sessions Court.8. It is also necessary to take note of some of the provisions of the said Act. Section 69 of the said Act provides that subject to the provisions of Section 70, any person subject to this

State Vs. Kawas Manekshaw Nanavati

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 75(2), 93 and 307; Constitution of India - Articles 72, 161 and 361; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 3(12), 53(16), 81(1), 82(10), 89(3), 122, 123, and 146; Supreme Court Rules - Order 21, Rule 5

Reported in : (1960)62BOMLR383; 1960CriLJ1558

was willing and ready to take the accused in naval custody as defined in S. 3(12) of the Navy Act, 1957, and that the accused would be detained under the orders of the Naval Provost Marshall in exercise of … quote the words of Taft C. J. in Ex parte Grossman (1925) 69 Law Ed 527, 'to afford relief from undue harshness or evident mistake … Chainani, C.J.(1) In Criminal Reference No. 159 of 1959, which was made to this Court under Section 307 Cr. P. C. by the Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, a Division Bench of this Court, consisting of

Commander V.S. Batra Vs. Chief of the Naval Staff, Naval Headquarters( ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 79

Reported in : 1998VAD(Delhi)91; 74(1998)DLT810; 1998(47)DRJ130

There was no conspiracy and the convening of the court martial was barred under Section 79 of the Navy Act, 1957.3. On the 29th of September, 1997, the Director of Personnel Services wrote the petitioner stating that since the

The State Of Sikkim Vs. Jasbir Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

the CrPC has empowered the Central Government to make rules consistent with the CrPC and the Army Act, Navy Act 1957 and the Air Force Act 1950 and any other law relating to the Armed Forces of the Union, … the deceased were both governed by the Army Act 19507 when the incident took place, in view of Section 69 of the Army Act, the accused could be tried only by a General Court-Martial and not by the

Joseph Shine Vs. Union Of India Secretary

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the applicant that officers of the Armed forces are subject to statutory provisions, viz., Army Act, 1950, Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Acts’). (5) Our attention is further drawn to … years or such less punishment as is in this Act mentioned.” (9) Finally, she drew our attention to Section 69:69. Civil offences. Subject to the provisions of section 70, any person subject to this Act who at any

Lt. Cdr., M.P. Verma Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 3 to 5, 13, 13(1) and 13(2); Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 2(1), 6, 6(1), 54(2), 65A, 65B, 77(2), 93, 97, 97(6), 97(7) to 97(22), 99, 99(2), 101 to 103, 104, 105, 110, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 123, 124, 130, 133, 162 and 163; Evidence Act - Sections 27, 155 and 155(2); Army Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 100, 102 and 165; Naval Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Navy Rules - Rule 16; Navy (Disciplinary and Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 148, 148(1), 148(5), 149, 151, 153, 167, 168, 169, 172(5) and 242 to 244; Travel Regulations

Reported in : 156(2009)DLT41

TJA, my objection about the members of this August body is in terms of Section 97 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 97, Sub-section (12) provides that, the President of a Court Marital shall be named by the authority ordering

Umesh Kumar Singh Vs. the Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Eastern Na ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : MRTP

thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.2) Did at about 19.20 hours on the 4th day of June, 1998 wrongfully confine Shri N.K.Marwaha, Branch Manager

Ex. Commodore Narinder M. Pandit Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 54(2), 60, 77(2), 81 and 82(3); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Army Act - Sections 71 and 73; Navy Pension Regulations - Regulations 15, 15(2) and 16

Reported in : 147(2008)DLT74; 2008(100)DRJ735; 2008(3)SLJ363(Delhi)

and messing was provided at the outstation, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 60(d) of the Navy Act, 1957.(2) Did on 19th Aug 2002 knowingly make a fraudulent statement in a document, namely Temporary Duty Claim CG/3224NM