Advanced Search Results

Commander Ranvir Kumar Sinha Vs. the Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1991(2)BomCR28; 1991CriLJ1729

of Ram (liquor) to sailors on board Indian Naval Ship Karwar and thereby committed an offence punishable under section 68 of the Navy Act, 1957. 2. Was between 23rd August 1986 and 17th October 1986 guilty of an … in the conduct of proceedings before the BOI. This representation, purporting to be under section 23 of the Navy Act, 1957 (the Act), was rejected by the Flag Officer Commanding-in-Chief, Eastern Command, on 21st October 1987. A further representation

Commander Ravinder Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Education

that he failed to conduct the flight briefing of 321 Flight, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 68 of the Navy Act, 1957 3. Did at about 1430h on 06 Nov 08 contravene Para 1 of … convened then it cannot be dissolved except on the conditions which are mentioned in Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957 reads as under; “123. Provisions relating to dissolution of courts-martial – (1)

Ex-surgeon Commander Bhaskar Roy Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Navy Act - Sections 81(1)(b) and 82(4); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354

Reported in : 1998(1)MhLj220

was found guilty under section 354, Indian Penal Code and under Sections 68, 77(2) and 74 of the Navy Act, 1957 and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 24 calendar months. He was also dismissed with disgrace from the Naval

K.C. Shibu Vs. Union of India, Represented by Secretary to the Governm ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Subject : Land Acquisition

03.4'E on the 25th day of November 2003 off Minicoy island and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 68 of the Navy Act, 1957. (j) The petitioner was found guilty of both the charges and awarded forfeiture … 08° 19.62'N 73° 03.4'E off Minicoy island and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 55(2) of the Navy Act 1957. ii. Charge 2. Between 25th day of November 2003 and 29th day of November 2003 contravene Regulation 1331

Malkiat Singh Khela Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Court Martial has held that the appellant is guilty of the offence punishable under Section 68 of the Navy Act, 1957 ('the Act' for short) and, accordingly, has passed an order imposing punishment of forfeiture of 36 months of

Ex-Surgeon Commander Bhaskar Roy vs Shri Devender Singh

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Indian Penal Code, 1860(hereinafter referred to as “IPC”) and under Section 68, 74 and 77(2) of The Navy Act, 1957, which culminated in Appellant being sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 24 months, vide Order dated 29.11.1995. Pursuant

Umesh Kumar Singh Vs. the Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Eastern Na ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : MRTP

thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.2) Did at about 19.20 hours on the 4th day of June, 1998 wrongfully confine Shri N.K.Marwaha, Branch Manager … have been written by him and signed by him. The following exhibits were marked through P.W.15:-Exhibit P-41 CNO 68/SOC/SD/VSP/98 dated 02.11.1998 being Report of the FPSI, SDFP Unit, Visakhapatnam City on the examination and comparison of photo

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

executed whereas, no such modification was carried out, thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 60(a) of the Navy Act 1957. There is no dispute in regard to the fact that the appellant had signed the Work Completion Report … purporting to show that the modifications shown in the said Work Completion Report Form amounting to about Rupees 68,950.00 (Rupees sixty eight thousand nine hundred fifty only) were executed whereas, no such modification was carried out, thereby

The State Of Sikkim Vs. Jasbir Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

the CrPC has empowered the Central Government to make rules consistent with the CrPC and the Army Act, Navy Act 1957 and the Air Force Act 1950 and any other law relating to the Armed Forces of the Union, … a person of any of the offences specified in Sections 31 to 68 inclusive, award either the particular punishment with which the offence is stated … a judgment of a Single Judge of the High Court of Sikkim. While exercising the revisional jurisdiction under Sections 397 and 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 19731, the High Court has

Ajmer Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 5, 428, and 475; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 167; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

Reported in : AIR1987SC1646; 1987CriLJ1877; 1987(2)Crimes433(SC); JT1987(2)SC290; 1987(1)SCALE953; (1987)3SCC340; [1987]3SCR84; 1987(2)LC219(SC)

Central Government may make rules consistent with this Code and the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957), and the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) and any other law, relating to … contained in the Army Act (hereinafter called the 'Act').8. Sections 34 to 68 contained in Chapter VI of the Act specify the different categories of … terms of imprisonment for the grant of benefit to them of the provision for set off contained in Section 428 of the CrPC. The High Court has granted certificates of fitness under Article 134A of the Constitution