Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: navy act 1957 section 67 · Page 1 of about 40 results (0.032 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 26 2005

Chairman-cum-managing Director, Fertilizer Corporation of India Limite ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-26-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 2, 2(1), 4(1), 7(4), 7(7), 13, 18 and 103; Payment of Gratuity (Central) Rules - Rules 10(2) and 17; Apprentice Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(9) and 2(22); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Working Journalists (Conditions of Service) Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1965; Payment of Wages Act; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970; Employees Provident Fund Act, 1952; Air force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 67; Labour Law; Indian Contract Act

Reported in : 2005(2)ESC1547

to the Air force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957).39. The legislature has used the word 'means' while defining the words 'employees' and 'wages' used … successful completion of their training.54. As regards the argument of engagement of minors, suffice it to say that Section 67 of the Factories Act, 1948 prohibits employment of young children below 14 years of age. Section 67 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 2011

M. Sanjay and Another Vs. Union of India, Represented by Its Secretary ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Decided on : Mar-25-2011

Subject : Education

has indulged in malpractice during an examination will in addition to the punishment awarded under Section 74 of Navy Act, 1957, will forefit his candidature and be debarred by administrative authority concerned from appearing in two successive examination in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2001

Union of India and anr. Vs. P.D. Yadav

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-16-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964 - Regulation 15(2); Army Act, 1950 - Sections 71 and 73; Constitution of India - Articles 20 to 22 and 300A; Army Rules, 1950 - Rules 14, 14(5) and 15; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 27, 45, 47, 48, 81 and 82; Military Engineer Services Regulations, 1968; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 2-A(4), 3, 4 and 16; Army Pension Act - Sections 16; Financial Regulation, 1983 - Rule 133

Reported in : 2001IXAD(SC)30; [2001(91)FLR961]; JT2001(8)SC617; 2001LabIC4014; 2001(7)SCALE270; (2002)1SCC405; 2001(4)SCT1002(SC); 2002(1)SLJ299(SC); (2002)1UPLBEC118

the said office and to come afterwards and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 47(a) of the Navy Act, 1957. 3. Did on the Twenty ninth day of September one thousand nine hundred eighty nine at about 1402 … said charges are:-1. He at field between 28th January, 1991 to 6th March, 1991 while being Garrison Engineer 671 Engr. Park when ordered to fabricate 28 SL shelters at the cost of Rs. 10 lacs with intent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 05 2012

Umesh Kumar Singh Vs. the Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Eastern Na ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Decided on : Jan-05-2012

Subject : MRTP

thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.2) Did at about 19.20 hours on the 4th day of June, 1998 wrongfully confine Shri N.K.Marwaha, Branch Manager

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2011

K.C. Shibu Vs. Union of India, Represented by Secretary to the Governm ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Decided on : May-19-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

08° 19.62'N 73° 03.4'E off Minicoy island and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 55(2) of the Navy Act 1957. ii. Charge 2. Between 25th day of November 2003 and 29th day of November 2003 contravene Regulation 1331 … more details and then a detailed letter was initiated on 29.11.2003. Therefore, the charge itself has become irrelevant. 67. We intend to consider this aspect of non compliance of Regulation 205 during the conduct of BOI in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 2025

Jsw Energy Ltd vs Government of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : May-02-2025

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957; or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee … by the appellant, as per the directions now issued by this Court.- 67 - 20.23. By relying on Everestee’s case, he submits that once a … that Respondent No.2 was working in a managerial cadre and was not a ‘workman’ within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘ID Act’ for brevity). 11.5. Respondent No.1-Government

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 2006

District Forest Officer, Madurai Division Vs. P. Ganesan (Died) and or ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-29-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 2, 2(1), 30, 30(1) and 30(2); Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 28; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; ;Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 - Rules 36 and 43; Constitution of India - Article 226; Limitation Act - Sections 5

Reported in : 2007ACJ1521; [2007(112)FLR561]; (2006)4MLJ1653

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee … definition of the term 'workman'.It is an admitted position that the respondent-workman was employed as forest guard. In Section II of the Act, list of persons, who, subject to the provisions of Section 2(1)(n) are included in … quash the order of Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Madurai in W.C. No. 67/91, dated 15.03.1994.2. The brief facts necessary for the disposal of the Writ

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 2018

Dinesh Pal vs.gnct of Delhi and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-18-2018

Subject : Education

Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950 ), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950 ), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957 ); or W.P.(C) 9829/2018 Page 7 of 8 17. is employed mainly in a managerial … award dated, 19th February, 2018, passed by the Labour Court, on an application filed by the petitioner under Section 37-C (ii) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as “the ID Act”). The petitioner had,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2007

C.K. Ravindaran Vs. New Horizon Sugar Mills Limited Represented by Its ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-06-2007

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10(1), 12(3) and 33C(2); Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

Reported in : (2007)IILLJ613Mad

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); orii who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee … on 11.05.1999.3. On 11.10.1995, a settlement was entered into between the first respondent Management and its workmen under Section 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short 'the Act') according to which each workman was required

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2022

The Chadayamangalam Rubber Marketing Co-Operative Society Ltd.No.Q 374 ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-19-2022

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee … petition on behalf of society has been filed laying challenge to the order of the Labour Court under Section 33(C)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act dated 09.02.2021 Ex.P8. The controversy in this case has already been narrated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial