Advanced Search Results

Umesh Kumar Singh Vs. the Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Eastern Na ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : MRTP

thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.2) Did at about 19.20 hours on the 4th day of June, 1998 wrongfully confine Shri N.K.Marwaha, Branch Manager

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

27th August, 1991 passed by Admiral L.R. Ramdas, Chief of the Naval Staff under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 maintaining the conviction of the petitioner on all charges except the charge 20 and reducing the sentence of … Denial of a fair Judicial Review - Non compliance of Section 160 and 161 of the Navy Act 66. On behalf of the petitioner, it was submitted that he was denied fair judicial review under Section 160

K.C. Shibu Vs. Union of India, Represented by Secretary to the Governm ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Subject : Land Acquisition

08° 19.62'N 73° 03.4'E off Minicoy island and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 55(2) of the Navy Act 1957. ii. Charge 2. Between 25th day of November 2003 and 29th day of November 2003 contravene Regulation 1331 … lead to damage to INS Kirpan. So, we confirm the findings of the Court Martial on Charge 1. 66. The second charge against the petitioner is that he failed as the Commanding Officer to report the grounding

Jsw Energy Ltd vs Government of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957; or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee … of the employer, whereas terminating the contract of service by way of- 66 -resignation By the workman is his own act. We are, therefore, of … that Respondent No.2 was working in a managerial cadre and was not a ‘workman’ within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘ID Act’ for brevity). 11.5. Respondent No.1-Government

Syed Muneer Raza Vs. Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 13(1), 56, 59, 65, 72, 73, 78 and 142; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21 and 226; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 78, 79 and 105; IRCA - Rule 117; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 78-B

Reported in : 2000(1)ALD689

commit any offence are deait with by the special provisions contained in the Army Act, 1950, or the Navy Act 1957 or the Air Force Act, 1950 and not by the normal Criminal Procedure Code. The said Navy Act … may be, the number of packages stated therein, shall lie on the consignor, the consignee or the endorsee. Section 66 of the Act contemplates that the owner or a person having charge of any goods which are brought

Mar Baselius Medical Mission Hospital Vs. Joseph Babu

Court : Kerala

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2(2) and 33C(2); Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2007(1)KLJ622; (2007)IILLJ925Ker

is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950(45of 1950) or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950)or the Navy Act, 1957(62 of 1957); or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee … physician employed by them filed a C.P. before the Labour Court, Ernakulam as C.P. No. 47/ 1991 under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act claiming certain benefits due to him including Sunday and holiday wages is … respondent is entitled to realise from the petitioner an amount of Rs. 66,000/- as holiday and Sunday wages. Exhibits P1 and P3 orders are under

Smt. Nanda Josh Vs. Union of India

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

commission, appointments, enrolment and conditions of service in respect of persons subject to the Army Act, 1950, the Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Fore Act, 1950. Sub-section (2) of Section 2 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act specifies

Management of M/s. Escorts Construction Equipment Limited, New Delhi V ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : MRTP

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … the same in paragraphs 10 to 16. Referring to the definition of the term “workman” as defined under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and also referring to the decision referred to in the said … No. 03621. Academic and :1. HSLC (MBOSE) Shillong 1985, Professional 1st Division, 66.33%. Qualification 2. Pre-University (SC) (NEHU) 1987 (St. Anthonys College, Shillong) 1st Div.

Rajan K.R. vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee … BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVNANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695004. 4 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,KSEB 66 KV SUB STATION, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT-690518. OTHER PRESENT: SRI.SUDHEER GANESH KUMAR,SC SRI.R.S.KAIKURA,SC, … per the provisions of the Private Security Agents (Regulation Act), 2005 is 65 years. It is argued that Section 10 of the said Act prescribes that security guard is eligible to continue in service up to 65

Vijaykumar S.G., vs State of Kerala,

Court : Kerala

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee … BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVNANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695004. 4 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,KSEB 66 KV SUB STATION, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT-690518. OTHER PRESENT: SRI.SUDHEER GANESH KUMAR,SC SRI.R.S.KAIKURA,SC, … per the provisions of the Private Security Agents (Regulation Act), 2005 is 65 years. It is argued that Section 10 of the said Act prescribes that security guard is eligible to continue in service up to 65