Advanced Search Results

Syed Muneer Raza Vs. Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 13(1), 56, 59, 65, 72, 73, 78 and 142; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21 and 226; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 78, 79 and 105; IRCA - Rule 117; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 78-B

Reported in : 2000(1)ALD689

commit any offence are deait with by the special provisions contained in the Army Act, 1950, or the Navy Act 1957 or the Air Force Act, 1950 and not by the normal Criminal Procedure Code. The said Navy Act … Act, the petitioners have executed forwarding note from Nuzvid to New Delhi.9. The learned Counsel also took to Section 65 of the Act, which contemplates issuance of receipt. It envisages that the railway administration shall, in a case

Umesh Kumar Singh Vs. the Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Eastern Na ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : MRTP

thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.2) Did at about 19.20 hours on the 4th day of June, 1998 wrongfully confine Shri N.K.Marwaha, Branch Manager

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

27th August, 1991 passed by Admiral L.R. Ramdas, Chief of the Naval Staff under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 maintaining the conviction of the petitioner on all charges except the charge 20 and reducing the sentence of … independent officials who had been constituted the Work Overseeing Team and had recorded the Work WP(C) No.6563/2011 page 65 of 80 Completion Report. The respondents do not assail the correctness of this document.134. It is noteworthy that

K.C. Shibu Vs. Union of India, Represented by Secretary to the Governm ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Subject : Land Acquisition

08° 19.62'N 73° 03.4'E off Minicoy island and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 55(2) of the Navy Act 1957. ii. Charge 2. Between 25th day of November 2003 and 29th day of November 2003 contravene Regulation 1331 … his subordinate officers for all the failings instead of taking responsibility himself for whatever happens on the ship. 65. We therefore have no doubt that there is adequate evidence to indicate negligence on the part of the

Srirupa Roy Vs. Lalit Kumar

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the complainant a monthly maintenance of Rs.59,170.92/- as is admissible under the provisions of Section 31 of the Navy Act, 1957, vide order dated 10.04.2023 issued by the Commander, CDR (P & A). The same reads as under:- “MAINTENANCE

Capt. N. Gopalakrishnan (Retired) Vs. Union of India, Rep by the Secre ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : Service

“3(o) ‘Service matters, in relation to the persons subject to the Army Act 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act 1957 (62 of 1957) and the Air Force Act 1950 (45 of 1950), mean all matters relating to the … dated 30.04.2010 has directed the applicant to move the petition once again before this Tribunal holding that under Section 3(o) of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, this Tribunal is having jurisdiction to entertain the petition. Further,

Sri.chandrakant S/o Husanappa Moolimani, Vs. The Management Of Nwkrtc, ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … which are in force from time to time.33. Part BB of Regulation 65 provides for the procedure for selection in respect of post of driver-cum-conductor. … ANNEXURE-A AND ALLOW THE CLAIM PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, HUBBALLI UNDER SECTION10(4-A) OF INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, ETC. IN W.P. No.112165/2017: BETWEEN: MARUTIGOUDA, S/O HANUMANTAGOUDA PATIL, AGED ABOUT35YEARS, OCC NIL, R/O

Basanagouda Vs. The Divisional Controller

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … which are in force from time to time.33. Part BB of Regulation 65 provides for the procedure for selection in respect of post of driver-cum-conductor. … ANNEXURE-A AND ALLOW THE CLAIM PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, HUBBALLI UNDER SECTION10(4-A) OF INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, ETC. IN W.P. No.112165/2017: BETWEEN: MARUTIGOUDA, S/O HANUMANTAGOUDA PATIL, AGED ABOUT35YEARS, OCC NIL, R/O

Sri.pundappa S/o Amoghappa Karagar Vs. The North West Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … which are in force from time to time.33. Part BB of Regulation 65 provides for the procedure for selection in respect of post of driver-cum-conductor. … ANNEXURE-A AND ALLOW THE CLAIM PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, HUBBALLI UNDER SECTION10(4-A) OF INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, ETC. IN W.P. No.112165/2017: BETWEEN: MARUTIGOUDA, S/O HANUMANTAGOUDA PATIL, AGED ABOUT35YEARS, OCC NIL, R/O

Sri.channappa S/o Gangaram Balaganur Vs. The Management Of Nwkrtc

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … which are in force from time to time.33. Part BB of Regulation 65 provides for the procedure for selection in respect of post of driver-cum-conductor. … ANNEXURE-A AND ALLOW THE CLAIM PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, HUBBALLI UNDER SECTION10(4-A) OF INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, ETC. IN W.P. No.112165/2017: BETWEEN: MARUTIGOUDA, S/O HANUMANTAGOUDA PATIL, AGED ABOUT35YEARS, OCC NIL, R/O