Advanced Search Results
Ex. Commodore Narinder M. Pandit Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Dec-14-2007
Service
Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 54(2), 60, 77(2), 81 and 82(3); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Army Act - Sections 71 and 73; Navy Pension Regulations - Regulations 15, 15(2) and 16
147(2008)DLT74; 2008(100)DRJ735; 2008(3)SLJ363(Delhi)
and messing was provided at the outstation, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 60(d) of the Navy Act, 1957.(2) Did on 19th Aug 2002 knowingly make a fraudulent statement in a document, namely Temporary Duty Claim CG/3224NM
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEx Cdre. Narinder Pandit Vs. Union of India and Others
Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi
May-19-2011
Right to Information
and messing was provided at the outstation, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 60(d) of the Navy Act, 1957. (2) Did on 19th Aug 2002 knowingly make a fraudulent statement in a document, namely Temporary Duty Claim
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAvtar Singh Vs. Union of India and Others
Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi
Dec-08-2010
Land Acquisition
executed whereas, no such modification was carried out, thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 60(a) of the Navy Act 1957. There is no dispute in regard to the fact that the appellant had signed the Work Completion Report
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Union of India and anr. Vs. P.D. Yadav
Supreme Court of India
Oct-16-2001
Service
Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964 - Regulation 15(2); Army Act, 1950 - Sections 71 and 73; Constitution of India - Articles 20 to 22 and 300A; Army Rules, 1950 - Rules 14, 14(5) and 15; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 27, 45, 47, 48, 81 and 82; Military Engineer Services Regulations, 1968; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 2-A(4), 3, 4 and 16; Army Pension Act - Sections 16; Financial Regulation, 1983 - Rule 133
2001IXAD(SC)30; [2001(91)FLR961]; JT2001(8)SC617; 2001LabIC4014; 2001(7)SCALE270; (2002)1SCC405; 2001(4)SCT1002(SC); 2002(1)SLJ299(SC); (2002)1UPLBEC118
the said office and to come afterwards and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 47(a) of the Navy Act, 1957. 3. Did on the Twenty ninth day of September one thousand nine hundred eighty nine at about 1402 … the supply order No. 3027/148/IWS dt. 1st Feb., 1991 for 'timber plank partal 11x11'x8-3/4' free from cracks qty. 60 on M/s. Akbar Furniture House and Saw Mills, Garhi, Udhampur, at the rate of Rs. 570/- each well
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommander Ravinder Singh Vs. Union of India and Others
Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi
May-29-2012
Education
convened then it cannot be dissolved except on the conditions which are mentioned in Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957 reads as under; â123. Provisions relating to dissolution of courts-martial â (1) … volume. He said âI caution you withdraw this show cause notice or else I will make out a 60 pages ROG case against you and this would be determent to your careerâ. 45. PW-2 further deposed that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Sanjay and Another Vs. Union of India, Represented by Its Secretary ...
Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi
Mar-25-2011
Education
has indulged in malpractice during an examination will in addition to the punishment awarded under Section 74 of Navy Act, 1957, will forefit his candidature and be debarred by administrative authority concerned from appearing in two successive examination in … a farce and he was charged under Section 74 of the Navy Act and awarded (a) No.12 for 60 days, (b) Reprimanded (c) and debarred from two subsequent courses. 4. It has been averred by the applicant
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAvtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors
Delhi
Sep-23-2013
Education
27th August, 1991 passed by Admiral L.R. Ramdas, Chief of the Naval Staff under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 maintaining the conviction of the petitioner on all charges except the charge 20 and reducing the sentence of … cycle chain respectively. However, the informant in her first information report did not say so WP(C) No.6563/2011 page 60 of 80 and, therefore, her evidence in court as against A-6 and A-7 assaulting the deceased was not
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShivendra Bikaram Singh (Ex. Lt.) Vs. Union of India(Uoi), Through the ...
Mumbai
May-02-2001
Criminal
Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 77, 77(2), 78, 78(1), 97, 101, 102, 103 and 163; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 325, 352, 425, 452, and 497; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 50; Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 156
2002(1)BomCR695
(Exh.P.2) as well as order passed by him in exercise of powers conferred under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 vide order dated January 31, 2001 (Exh. P.2/A). The petitioner challenges these orders whereby the Chief of the … solemnization of the marriage.'The respondents then relied on the evidence of P.W. 6, more particularly, on Question Nos. 605 and 606 to establish the factum of marriage and its legality. In examination-in-chief, P.W. 6 Miss Aarti Tandon
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndian Nval Canteen Service Employees Un Vs. Union of India
Kerala
Sep-12-2013
Land Acquisition
regulations were amended with effect from 11/04/1988 and the amended Regulation is Ext.P4(a). e) Section 3(12A) of the Navy Act 1957 defines Naval Establishment as meaning, an establishment belonging to or under the control of Indian Navy whether within … that INCS, was established in 1947 by the Government of India as a business concern vide Navy Instruction 60/47 so as to supply house-hold items to ships and establishments, defence personnel and their W.P.C.No.32100/11 6 families including
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUmesh Kumar Singh Vs. the Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Eastern Na ...
Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai
Jan-05-2012
MRTP
thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.2) Did at about 19.20 hours on the 4th day of June, 1998 wrongfully confine Shri N.K.Marwaha, Branch Manager
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »