Advanced Search Results

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

27th August, 1991 passed by Admiral L.R. Ramdas, Chief of the Naval Staff under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 maintaining the conviction of the petitioner on all charges except the charge 20 and reducing the sentence of … officer.77. At this juncture, we may usefully reproduce a passage from the judgment reported at (1969) 1 QB 577, 599 Metropolitan Properties Co. (F.G.C.) Ltd. v. Lannon wherein Lord Denning M.R. observed thus:“……in considering whether there was

Umesh Kumar Singh Vs. the Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Eastern Na ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : MRTP

thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.2) Did at about 19.20 hours on the 4th day of June, 1998 wrongfully confine Shri N.K.Marwaha, Branch Manager

Kush Kalra vs.union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Act, 1950; Section 12 of the Air Force Act, 1950 as well as Section 9 of the Indian Navy Act, 1957 contain specific and express provisions excluding women from eligibility for enrolment. In this regard, it may be useful

Tourism Corporation of Gujarat Ltd. Vs. Kalu Valji Jethwa

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Working Journalists and other Newspaper Employees (Conditions of Service and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1955; Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2(9), 2(14), 17B, 25C, 25F and 79; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2(1), 51, 51(1), 51(2), 52, 53 and 55; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952; Employees State Insurance Act, 1949; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948; Apprentices Act, 1961; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948; Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Constitution of India - Article 311

Reported in : [2008(117)FLR408]; (2008)1GLR12; (2008)ILLJ985Guj; 2009(2)SLJ37(NULL); 2008(2)AIRKarR227(FB)(Guj)

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or[ii] who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee … to the Labour Court, Junagadh which was registered as Reference (LCJ) No. 57 of 1996. After hearing the parties, by award dated 24th May 2001, … Appellant Corporation3. Based on statutory provisions 3.1 On behalf of the appellants it is submitted that as per Section 2(s) of the Act, a 'workman' only means a person appointed on full-time basis and would not include

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Etc. Vs. H.K. Khatau and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 10(1); Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 1(3), 2, 4 and 7

Reported in : 1983(2)BomCR747; [1984(48)FLR322]; (1984)ILLJ448Bom

State Government, or who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950, the Army Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957.'The learned counsel urged that the definition of 'employee' under the Act is analogous to the definition of … the date of nationalisation. The Government of India also passed Act No. 57 of 1972 known as the General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 and … any instrument or contract having effect by virtue of any enactment under the Act. The sweep of this Section clearly provides that the right to claim gratuity by an employee under the provisions of this Act is

Sumathy Amma.B vs Smt.Leelabhai

Court : Kerala

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee … 28th mile, Pedikkottukonam, Vettiyara P.O, Navaikulam, Thiruvananthapuram. 2 J.Rama Chandran Pillai, aged 57 years, S/o.Janardhana Pillai, R.S.Bhavan, Devesswaram, Kilimanoor, Thiruvananthapuram 3 Unni.S, S/o.Sivadasan, aged 61 … Company, Navaikulam, on the ground that all the claimants were not falling with the definition of ‘workmen’ under Section 2(S) of the Industrial Dispute Act and therefore, did not have any jurisdiction. All the workers in the

Union Of India Vs. Air Commodore Nk Sharma

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

commission, appointments, enrolment and conditions of service in respect of persons subject to the Army Act, 1950, the Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950 and also to provide for appeals arising out of orders, findings or … allow the Respondent to continue in service beyond the age of superannuation, 57 years. He was due to retire from service on 30 November 2015. … …APPELLANT(S) VERSUS AIR COMMODORE NK SHARMA (17038) ADM/LGL …RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT SANJAY KAROL J., 1. This Civil Appeal, under Section 31(1)1 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 20072 at the instance of the Union of India, is directed

S. Ramu and Others Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Its Chief Secr ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Subject : Service Tax

to say, to whom the provisions of the Army Act, 1950, the Air Force Act, 1950 or the Navy Act, 1957 apply serving in any part of the State. The issue before the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay was … counsel for State of andhra Pradesh. 2. This application is filed by 57 applicants seeking for the following reliefs:- "Declare the 1st respondent action in … of the employees regarding exemption is not tenable and that there is no similar provision as that of Section 27A of the Maharastra Act in the andhra Pradesh Tax on Professions, Trades, Callings and Employments Act and

Chittaranjan Das Vs. Durgapore Project Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Apprentice Act, 1961 - Section 18; ;Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 99CWN897,(1996)IIILLJ188Cal

- (i) who is subject to the Army Act, 1950. or the Air Force Act, 1950 or the Navy Act, 1957:or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of a … V and has also appeared in the MatriculationExamination but did not succeed. 57. It, therefore, cannot be his case that no record of his date … of the petitioner in short is that in terms of the Standing Order framed by the respondent under Section 7 of the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946, his date of birth having been recorded as September

Middendorf Vs. Henry

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

U.S.C. § 865(c). Plaintiffs did not file a petition for review with the Judge Advocate General of the Navy pursuant to Art. 69, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 869. [ Footnote 6 ] In the District Court, plaintiffs … Footnote 16 ] Our Brother MARSHALL argues, post at 425 U. S. 57 -58, and nn. 8 and 9, that the military considers a summary … "to exercise justice promptly for relatively minor offenses" in an informal proceeding conducted by a single commissioned officer, acting as judge, factfinder, prosecutor, and defense counsel (with jurisdiction only over noncommissioned officers and other enlisted personnel), who … 1, 46 C.M.R. at 308 n. 1. [ Footnote 15 ] This section provides that a commanding officer (of the grade of major or lieutenant