Advanced Search Results

Ex. Commodore Narinder M. Pandit Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 54(2), 60, 77(2), 81 and 82(3); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Army Act - Sections 71 and 73; Navy Pension Regulations - Regulations 15, 15(2) and 16

Reported in : 147(2008)DLT74; 2008(100)DRJ735; 2008(3)SLJ363(Delhi)

and messing was provided at the outstation, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 60(d) of the Navy Act, 1957.(2) Did on 19th Aug 2002 knowingly make a fraudulent statement in a document, namely Temporary Duty Claim CG/3224NM … Movers, on his permanent transfer from New Delhi to Mumbai, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 54(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.(8) Was at about 2000 hrs on 14th Apr 2003, guilty of conduct unbecoming

Lt. Cdr., M.P. Verma Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 3 to 5, 13, 13(1) and 13(2); Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 2(1), 6, 6(1), 54(2), 65A, 65B, 77(2), 93, 97, 97(6), 97(7) to 97(22), 99, 99(2), 101 to 103, 104, 105, 110, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 123, 124, 130, 133, 162 and 163; Evidence Act - Sections 27, 155 and 155(2); Army Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 100, 102 and 165; Naval Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Navy Rules - Rule 16; Navy (Disciplinary and Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 148, 148(1), 148(5), 149, 151, 153, 167, 168, 169, 172(5) and 242 to 244; Travel Regulations

Reported in : 156(2009)DLT41

TJA, my objection about the members of this August body is in terms of Section 97 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 97, Sub-section (12) provides that, the President of a Court Marital shall be named by the authority ordering … Mumbai, suppliers of computer related items to the Indian Navy, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 54(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.(5) Did at about 1330 hrs on 13 February, 2003 being a public servant

Swapan Kumar Mishra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2009(1)OLR58

filing a review petition before the Chief of the Naval Staff in consonance with Section 160 of the Navy Act, 1957. The said authority considered the charges framed against the petitioner and the materials available on record and holding … Court Martial, Mr. Patnaik submitted that the said authority found the petitioner guilty of two charges under Section 54(2) of the Navy Act and one charge under Section 406 IPC read with Section 77(2) of the Navy

Ex Cdre. Narinder Pandit Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

and messing was provided at the outstation, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 60(d) of the Navy Act, 1957. (2) Did on 19th Aug 2002 knowingly make a fraudulent statement in a document, namely Temporary Duty Claim … Nos. 1 and 2 under Navy Act Section 60(d), Charge Nos. 8 and 9 under Navy Act Section 54(2), Charge Nos. 3, 10 and 12 under Section 13()1)(d)(ii) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 read in

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

executed whereas, no such modification was carried out, thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 60(a) of the Navy Act 1957. There is no dispute in regard to the fact that the appellant had signed the Work Completion Report … proceedings conducted from 1.11.1990 to 15.3.1991 whereby the petitioner was held guilty for the offences under Sections 60(a), 54(2), 77(2), 41(2), 48(a) and 74 of the Navy Act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for twenty four

Lt. Col. Sudhir Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 80, 163(1) and 165

Reported in : 82(1999)DLT183

under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 read in conjunction with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957. (2) Did at about 1900 hours on the Eleventh day of October, 1996, was guilty of conduct unbecoming … 1996, to Shri Basant Kumar Dash at Balugan Railway Station, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 54(2) of the Navy Act, 1957. (3) Did at about 1900 hours on the Fourteenth day of October, 1996

Umesh Kumar Singh Vs. the Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Eastern Na ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : MRTP

thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.2) Did at about 19.20 hours on the 4th day of June, 1998 wrongfully confine Shri N.K.Marwaha, Branch Manager … had taken the scooter from a show room and the registration number of the scooter is AP31 N 5413, which is at present with DK Singh. On 25th July 1998 UK Singh (accused/appellant herein) was discharged from

Commopore C.P. George Vs. Chief of Naval Staff

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 81, 81(1), 82, 82(20), 93 and 94(2)

Reported in : 58(1995)DLT578

are of the view that the Chief of Naval Staff has such a power.(15) Section 81(l)(n) of the Navy Act, 1957 permits other minor punishments which were being imposed by 'custom' to be imposed. Section 82 deals with the … for staying his juniors promotions.(5) On the basis that petitioner was to retire as Commodore on completion of 54 years (i.e. on 30-4-93) tile pension papers were moved. According to petitioners, if his name continues in the

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

27th August, 1991 passed by Admiral L.R. Ramdas, Chief of the Naval Staff under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 maintaining the conviction of the petitioner on all charges except the charge 20 and reducing the sentence of … was thus neither permitted a proper inspection of the records nor furnished copies thereof. Change of Judge Advocate 54. The petitioner has also made a grievance with regard to the appointment of the Trial Judge Advocate and

Ajay Kumar Singh Vs. Flag officer Commanding and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

affirmed the conviction of the appellants under Sections 342 and 392 IPC read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957 and modified the sentence of imprisonment to that of the period already undergone by them. Appellant Dhirendra Kumar