Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: navy act 1957 section 50 · Page 1 of about 268 results (0.025 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 02 2001

Shivendra Bikaram Singh (Ex. Lt.) Vs. Union of India(Uoi), Through the ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-02-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 77, 77(2), 78, 78(1), 97, 101, 102, 103 and 163; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 325, 352, 425, 452, and 497; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 50; Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 156

Reported in : 2002(1)BomCR695

(Exh.P.2) as well as order passed by him in exercise of powers conferred under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 vide order dated January 31, 2001 (Exh. P.2/A). The petitioner challenges these orders whereby the Chief of the … 497 of I.P.C. should necessarily fail. This submission proceeds on the premise that the mandate of proviso to section 50 of the Evidence Act postulates that, mere opinion, although based on evidence about relationship of one person to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 1997

P.D. Yadav Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-04-1997

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Navy Pension Rules, 1964 - Rule 15(2)

Reported in : 1997IIAD(Delhi)901; 66(1997)DLT832; 1997(41)DRJ172

M. Jagannadha Rao, J.(1) These two writ petitions arising under the Navy Act, 1957 have been referred to a Full bench for being disposed of Along with Cwp 2813/94, 2866/90 and 4706/94 … 1980. He was charge-sheeted in January 1990 and tried by a General Court Martial on 5 charges under Sections 43, 47 and 48 of the Navy Act, found guilty of the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th charges … filing of the writ petition, an order was passed on 28.3.1994 forfeiting 50% of the pensionary benefits. The said order is questioned before us. (4)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 2013

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-23-2013

Subject : Education

27th August, 1991 passed by Admiral L.R. Ramdas, Chief of the Naval Staff under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 maintaining the conviction of the petitioner on all charges except the charge 20 and reducing the sentence of … clarification before the court martial in answer to question no.1008 put by the prosecutor :- WP(C) No.6563/2011 page 50 of 80 “Q.1008 I am showing this Exhibit P-56 which account do these details belong to?. A. These

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 11 2009

Battula Veeraswamy Vs. the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and or ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-11-2009

Subject : Service

Acts : Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 1, 3, 5, 5A, 5D, 6, 6C, 6D, 7, 11, 14, 14A, 16, 17(1), 17(1C), 27 and 27A; Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rules 49(1), 50(1) and 50(2); Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1971 ;Constitution of India - Articles 36, 37, 41, 47 and 226; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Civil Service Regulations

Reported in : 2009(6)ALT464

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) ;(f) `Family pension' means `Family Pension, 1964', admissible under Rule 54 but does not include … Rule 49 (ii) `retirement gratuity/death gratuity payable under Sub-rule (1) of Rule 50 ; and (iii) `residuary gratuity' payable under Sub-rule (2) of Rule 50 … The writ petitioner initially joined the services of Accounts Department on 6.11.1959. While he was working as a Section Officer (Accounts), he came on deputation to Mishra Dhatu Nigam Ltd, Hyderabad, a Government of India Undertaking (hereinafter

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 1998

Commander V.S. Batra Vs. Chief of the Naval Staff, Naval Headquarters( ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-27-1998

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 79

Reported in : 1998VAD(Delhi)91; 74(1998)DLT810; 1998(47)DRJ130

There was no conspiracy and the convening of the court martial was barred under Section 79 of the Navy Act, 1957.3. On the 29th of September, 1997, the Director of Personnel Services wrote the petitioner stating that since the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2014

Ex Navy Direct Entry Artificers Association and Others Vs. the Union o ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Decided on : Jan-22-2014

Subject : MRTP

Navy Act, as per his submission. He further brought out that vide Sections 19A and 19B of the Navy Act, 1957 provisions still exist for Indian Naval Reserve Force and hence practice of keeping Sailors in Fleet Reserve on … of 10 years followed by liability to remain 10 years in Fleet Reserve. He further submitted that under Section 14 of the Navy Act, Sailors shall be liable to serve the Indian Navy or the Indian Naval … fact that they were placed in Fleet Reserve for 10 years and 50% of the period of reserve would accrue towards pension. While a request

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 29 2008

Swapan Kumar Mishra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Oct-29-2008

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2009(1)OLR58

filing a review petition before the Chief of the Naval Staff in consonance with Section 160 of the Navy Act, 1957. The said authority considered the charges framed against the petitioner and the materials available on record and holding … by Act 22 of 2002], 110 & 104 & Letters Patent, 1865, Clause 10: [Dr. B.S. Chauhan, CJ, L. Mohapatra & A.S. Naidu, JJ] Letters Patent Appeal Order of Single Judge of High Court passed while deciding

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 2000

Union of India and Others Vs. R.P. Yadav

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-10-2000

Subject : ServiceContract

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 3(20), 11, 14(1), 15, 16, 17, 18, 41 and 184(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Contract Act - Sections 18, 19; Indian Contract Act, 1982 - Sections 18(1)

Reported in : AIR2000SC2252; JT2000(6)SC371; 2000(4)SCALE600; (2000)5SCC325; [2000]Supp1SCR196; (2000)3UPLBEC2174

In our view the answer to the first question rests on the interpretation of relevant provisions of the, Navy Act, 1957, the Navy (Discipline and Misc. Provision) Regulation 1965 and Navy Order No. Str. 17 of 1994 regarding re-engagement … Misc. Provision) Regulation 1965 and Navy Order No. Str. 17 of 1994 regarding re-engagement of 'Sailors' (RP/0805/93). In Section 3(20) 'sailor' is defined as a person in the naval service other than an officer. In Section 11, … confirmed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi in L.P.A. No. 327 of 1999 and C.W.P. No. 1368/98 [Reported in (1998) 76

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 1960

State Vs. Kawas Manekshaw Nanavati

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-30-1960

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 75(2), 93 and 307; Constitution of India - Articles 72, 161 and 361; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 3(12), 53(16), 81(1), 82(10), 89(3), 122, 123, and 146; Supreme Court Rules - Order 21, Rule 5

Reported in : (1960)62BOMLR383; 1960CriLJ1558

was willing and ready to take the accused in naval custody as defined in S. 3(12) of the Navy Act, 1957, and that the accused would be detained under the orders of the Naval Provost Marshall in exercise of … Chainani, C.J.(1) In Criminal Reference No. 159 of 1959, which was made to this Court under Section 307 Cr. P. C. by the Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, a Division Bench of this Court, consisting of … Court has taen the same view in G. D. Karkarey v. T. L. Shevde, ILR 1952 Nag 409 : AIR 1952 Nag 330 it was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 22 2008

Lt. Cdr., M.P. Verma Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-22-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 3 to 5, 13, 13(1) and 13(2); Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 2(1), 6, 6(1), 54(2), 65A, 65B, 77(2), 93, 97, 97(6), 97(7) to 97(22), 99, 99(2), 101 to 103, 104, 105, 110, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 123, 124, 130, 133, 162 and 163; Evidence Act - Sections 27, 155 and 155(2); Army Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 100, 102 and 165; Naval Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Navy Rules - Rule 16; Navy (Disciplinary and Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 148, 148(1), 148(5), 149, 151, 153, 167, 168, 169, 172(5) and 242 to 244; Travel Regulations

Reported in : 156(2009)DLT41

TJA, my objection about the members of this August body is in terms of Section 97 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 97, Sub-section (12) provides that, the President of a Court Marital shall be named by the authority ordering … at Material Organisation (Mumbai), by abusing his position as public servant obtain for himself pecuniary advantage comprising Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) in cash from Mr. KS Subramanian, General Manager, Safari Industries (India) Limited, suppliers of suitcases

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial