Advanced Search Results

Union of India and anr. Vs. P.D. Yadav

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964 - Regulation 15(2); Army Act, 1950 - Sections 71 and 73; Constitution of India - Articles 20 to 22 and 300A; Army Rules, 1950 - Rules 14, 14(5) and 15; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 27, 45, 47, 48, 81 and 82; Military Engineer Services Regulations, 1968; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 2-A(4), 3, 4 and 16; Army Pension Act - Sections 16; Financial Regulation, 1983 - Rule 133

Reported in : 2001IXAD(SC)30; [2001(91)FLR961]; JT2001(8)SC617; 2001LabIC4014; 2001(7)SCALE270; (2002)1SCC405; 2001(4)SCT1002(SC); 2002(1)SLJ299(SC); (2002)1UPLBEC118

the said office and to come afterwards and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 47(a) of the Navy Act, 1957. 3. Did on the Twenty ninth day of September one thousand nine hundred eighty nine at about 1402 … manner in the office of the Officer-in-Charge. Communication center, Delhi and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 48(c) of the Navy Act, 1957. 4. Did on the Twenty ninth day of September one thousand nine hundred

Commander Ravinder Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Education

convened then it cannot be dissolved except on the conditions which are mentioned in Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957 reads as under; “123. Provisions relating to dissolution of courts-martial – (1) … hoom kaun rokta hai mujhe. Aag laga doonga is jagah ko” and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 48(c) of the Navy Act, 1957. 5. Did at about 0850h on 07 Nov 08 wilfully disobey the lawful

NitIn Shankar Kadkol Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalFamily

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 304B and 498A; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 77(2), 113 and 114

Reported in : I(2004)DMC695; 2004(2)MhLj767

thereby committed an offence under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957 and (b) that on 29-1-1994 between 2000 Hrs. and 2300 Hrs. the petitioner caused death of Padma by … Mukherjee v. Union of India reported in : 1990CriLJ2148a has reiterated the same principle in paras 47 and 48 as under :--'47. For the reasons aforesaid it must be held that reasons are not required to be

Chandrasekharasharma Vs. C. Krishnaiah Chetty

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution Of India - Articles 226, 227; Industrial Disputes Act - Section 3, 1947 - Sections 10(1)(c), 2(s), 2(oo)(bb), 2(b), 2(rr); andhra pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, 1988 - section 48(1); Sales Act - Section 1(4); Dock Workers Act 1948 - Section 5A; Sales Promotion Employees (Conditions of Service) Act, 1976 ; Workmen's Compensation Act. 1923; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 Maternity Benefit Act, 1961; Payment of Bonus Act. 1965; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Navy Act 1934; Plantation Labour Act, 1951 - Section 2; Industrial Disputes (ID) Act; Amending Act 1982;

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950, (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee … in full and final settlement of accounts. Petitioner was also informed that this action was in accordance with section 2(oo)(bb) of Industrial Disputes Act. Aggrieved by the said action petitioner raised a dispute before the Labour Commissioner … Court in the case of SPIC Pharmaceuticals Division Versus Authority under Section 48(1) of A.P. Shops and Establishments Act, 1988 and another reported in (2007)

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

executed whereas, no such modification was carried out, thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 60(a) of the Navy Act 1957. There is no dispute in regard to the fact that the appellant had signed the Work Completion Report … 2.5.1989, while on board, the appellant slapped Sub Lt. Baljor Singh Jakhar, thereby he committed the offence under Section 48(a) of the Navy Act and on 31.10.1989; he acted prejudicial to good order and Naval discipline by making

Umesh Kumar Singh Vs. the Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Eastern Na ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : MRTP

thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.2) Did at about 19.20 hours on the 4th day of June, 1998 wrongfully confine Shri N.K.Marwaha, Branch Manager … crime. The entire deposition given before the Court of Cdr-at-Arms (Retd) JA.Rocque from pages 456 to 472 and 486 to 511 in the Court Martial Proceedings Vol.II would be worth reading which would bring about the details

Commander Vinod Kumar Jha Versus Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

state. Accordingly, the petitioner was dismissed from service in exercise of its powers of Section 15 of the Navy Act, 1957 read with Regulation 216. An affidavit was also filed by the Chief of Naval Staff Admiral Arun Prakash … valuable things. They blind folded the petitioner and took him for interrogation. He was detained for more than 48 hours and he alleged that he was maltreated and was also physically assaulted. 3. He alleged that some

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

27th August, 1991 passed by Admiral L.R. Ramdas, Chief of the Naval Staff under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 maintaining the conviction of the petitioner on all charges except the charge 20 and reducing the sentence of … sanction" was taken away and it was compelled to act mechanically to sanction the prosecution.” (Underlining by us) 48. In (2005) 8 SCC 296 State of West Bengal &Anr v. Alpana Roy &Ors., the Supreme Court has

Lt. Cdr., M.P. Verma Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 3 to 5, 13, 13(1) and 13(2); Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 2(1), 6, 6(1), 54(2), 65A, 65B, 77(2), 93, 97, 97(6), 97(7) to 97(22), 99, 99(2), 101 to 103, 104, 105, 110, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 123, 124, 130, 133, 162 and 163; Evidence Act - Sections 27, 155 and 155(2); Army Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 100, 102 and 165; Naval Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Navy Rules - Rule 16; Navy (Disciplinary and Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 148, 148(1), 148(5), 149, 151, 153, 167, 168, 169, 172(5) and 242 to 244; Travel Regulations

Reported in : 156(2009)DLT41

TJA, my objection about the members of this August body is in terms of Section 97 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 97, Sub-section (12) provides that, the President of a Court Marital shall be named by the authority ordering

P.D. Yadav Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Navy Pension Rules, 1964 - Rule 15(2)

Reported in : 1997IIAD(Delhi)901; 66(1997)DLT832; 1997(41)DRJ172

M. Jagannadha Rao, J.(1) These two writ petitions arising under the Navy Act, 1957 have been referred to a Full bench for being disposed of Along with Cwp 2813/94, 2866/90 and 4706/94 … 1980. He was charge-sheeted in January 1990 and tried by a General Court Martial on 5 charges under Sections 43, 47 and 48 of the Navy Act, found guilty of the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th charges