Advanced Search Results

Union of India and anr. Vs. P.D. Yadav

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964 - Regulation 15(2); Army Act, 1950 - Sections 71 and 73; Constitution of India - Articles 20 to 22 and 300A; Army Rules, 1950 - Rules 14, 14(5) and 15; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 27, 45, 47, 48, 81 and 82; Military Engineer Services Regulations, 1968; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 2-A(4), 3, 4 and 16; Army Pension Act - Sections 16; Financial Regulation, 1983 - Rule 133

Reported in : 2001IXAD(SC)30; [2001(91)FLR961]; JT2001(8)SC617; 2001LabIC4014; 2001(7)SCALE270; (2002)1SCC405; 2001(4)SCT1002(SC); 2002(1)SLJ299(SC); (2002)1UPLBEC118

the said office and to come afterwards and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 47(a) of the Navy Act, 1957. 3. Did on the Twenty ninth day of September one thousand nine hundred eighty nine at about 1402

Gajendra Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 46, 47, 47(1), 80, 81 and 141(2); Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307, 323 and 452; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 41, 41(1) and 42; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 192, 439 and 475; Criminal Courts and Security Force Courts (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1969 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3 and 4; Constitution of India; Air Force Law

Reported in : 1995CriLJ3347; 1995(3)WLC635; 1995(2)WLN31

Court-martial. (1) The Central Government may make rules, consistent with this Code and the Army Act, 1950, the Navy Act, 1957, and the Air Force Act, 1950, and any other law, relating to the Armed Forces of the Union, … Section 46 of the Act deals with Civil Offences. It lays down that subject to the provisions of Section 47, an person subject to B. S. F. Act, who at any place in, or beyond, India, commits any

P.D. Yadav Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Navy Pension Rules, 1964 - Rule 15(2)

Reported in : 1997IIAD(Delhi)901; 66(1997)DLT832; 1997(41)DRJ172

M. Jagannadha Rao, J.(1) These two writ petitions arising under the Navy Act, 1957 have been referred to a Full bench for being disposed of Along with Cwp 2813/94, 2866/90 and 4706/94 … 1980. He was charge-sheeted in January 1990 and tried by a General Court Martial on 5 charges under Sections 43, 47 and 48 of the Navy Act, found guilty of the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th charges

NitIn Shankar Kadkol Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalFamily

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 304B and 498A; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 77(2), 113 and 114

Reported in : I(2004)DMC695; 2004(2)MhLj767

thereby committed an offence under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957 and (b) that on 29-1-1994 between 2000 Hrs. and 2300 Hrs. the petitioner caused death of Padma by … of S.N. Mukherjee v. Union of India reported in : 1990CriLJ2148a has reiterated the same principle in paras 47 and 48 as under :--'47. For the reasons aforesaid it must be held that reasons are not required

Battula Veeraswamy Vs. the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and or ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 1, 3, 5, 5A, 5D, 6, 6C, 6D, 7, 11, 14, 14A, 16, 17(1), 17(1C), 27 and 27A; Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rules 49(1), 50(1) and 50(2); Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1971 ;Constitution of India - Articles 36, 37, 41, 47 and 226; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Civil Service Regulations

Reported in : 2009(6)ALT464

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) ;(f) `Family pension' means `Family Pension, 1964', admissible under Rule 54 but does not include … as punishable offences.11. A combined reading of Articles 36, 37, 41 and 47 of our Constitution makes it clear that the principles enunciated there under … The writ petitioner initially joined the services of Accounts Department on 6.11.1959. While he was working as a Section Officer (Accounts), he came on deputation to Mishra Dhatu Nigam Ltd, Hyderabad, a Government of India Undertaking (hereinafter

Commander Ravinder Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Education

convened then it cannot be dissolved except on the conditions which are mentioned in Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957 reads as under; “123. Provisions relating to dissolution of courts-martial – (1) … office copy of the show cause notice issued to him, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 47(a) of the Navy Act, 1957. 6. Did at about 0850h on 07 Nov 08 use insubordinate and threatening

Umesh Kumar Singh Vs. the Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Eastern Na ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : MRTP

thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.2) Did at about 19.20 hours on the 4th day of June, 1998 wrongfully confine Shri N.K.Marwaha, Branch Manager … 25 of the Arms Act. The case was taken over by the Navy under the provisions of Section 475 of Cr.P.C. read in conjunction with Criminal Courts and Courts Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules 1978. The matter

Commodore Narinder M. Pandit S/O Late Munshi Ram Arjundas Pandit Vs. t ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2004(4)BomCR814; (2004)106BOMLR98

Court Martial. The charge-sheet was issued against the petitioner alleging that the petitioner has committed various offences under Navy Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Navy Act') as well as certain offences punishable under the Prevention of … of the petitioners were overruled and the Court Martial proceeded further. The petitioner was arraigned in terms of Section 106 of the Navy Act and the petitioner pleaded not guilty to all the charges.4. The contentions raised

Lt. Cdr., M.P. Verma Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 3 to 5, 13, 13(1) and 13(2); Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 2(1), 6, 6(1), 54(2), 65A, 65B, 77(2), 93, 97, 97(6), 97(7) to 97(22), 99, 99(2), 101 to 103, 104, 105, 110, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 123, 124, 130, 133, 162 and 163; Evidence Act - Sections 27, 155 and 155(2); Army Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 100, 102 and 165; Naval Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Navy Rules - Rule 16; Navy (Disciplinary and Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 148, 148(1), 148(5), 149, 151, 153, 167, 168, 169, 172(5) and 242 to 244; Travel Regulations

Reported in : 156(2009)DLT41

TJA, my objection about the members of this August body is in terms of Section 97 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 97, Sub-section (12) provides that, the President of a Court Marital shall be named by the authority ordering

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

27th August, 1991 passed by Admiral L.R. Ramdas, Chief of the Naval Staff under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 maintaining the conviction of the petitioner on all charges except the charge 20 and reducing the sentence of … during the ships refit. The WOT included representatives of the Naval Headquarters, a representative from WP(C) No.6563/2011 page 47 of 80 the ship as well as a representative of M/s. Garden Reach Ship Builders and Engineers (GRSE).95.