Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: navy act 1957 section 44 · Page 1 of about 73 results (0.098 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 25 2008

G. Pratibha Raghuram W/O Shri G. Raghuram and S.K. Alwar F/O G. Pratib ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-25-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy Regulation; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 49, 49(1), 49(2), 51 and 183; Army Act, 1950; Evidence Act, 1872

Reported in : 2008(5)ALLMR335; 2009(1)BomCR210; (2008)110BOMLR2571

Board of Inquiry conducted by the respondents, it will be important to refer to certain provisions of the Navy Act, 1957 and also the Regulations framed under the Act. We are concerned with only Section 49(1), and the bare … Police Officer without an order from a Magistrate and without a warrant. A distinct and different power under Section 44 of the Code empowers the Magistrate to arrest or order any person to arrest the offender. Under Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 2008

V. Siva Kumar and ors. Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Defence and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-08-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy Grade-C Non-Industrial Posts, Store House Staff, Recruitment Rules, 1984; Constitution of India - Article 309

Reported in : 2008(3)ALD41(SC); [2008(116)FLR540]; (2008)2MLJ761(SC); 2008(1)SCALE293; (2008)2SCC99; 2008AIRSCW530; 2008LABIC766

- Labour and Services. Seniority: [Dr. Arijit Pasayat & P. Sathasivam, JJ] Store Keepers Inter se seniority - Navy Act (62 of 1957), Section 174 Navy Grade-C Non-Industrial Posts, Store House Staff, Recruitment Rules, 1984, Rule 1 Office … On 4.12.1989 inter se seniority list was prepared in which the appellants were shown at serial 4 to 44. The list was sent to all naval establishments for circulation, verification and for pointing out any discrepancy and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 04 2007

Kalawati Pandurang Fulzele Vs. Divisional Controller

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-04-2007

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 2(14), 3, 3(5), 10(2), 28 and 44; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 25B, 25F and 25G; Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957 - Rule 81; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Sales Promotion Employees (Conditions of Service) Act, 1976 - Sections 2; Contract Labour Act; Labour and Industrial Law; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(1), 15(3), 38, 39, 41, 42, 43, 46, 47 and 227

Reported in : 2007(5)ALLMR80; 2007(5)BomCR177

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee … before the Labour Court.4. The respondent Corporation challenged the judgment of the Labour Court by filing Revision under Section 44 of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971 before the Industrial Court, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur vide Revision (ULPA) No. 339/2002.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 29 2012

Commander Ravinder Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : May-29-2012

Subject : Education

convened then it cannot be dissolved except on the conditions which are mentioned in Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957 reads as under; “123. Provisions relating to dissolution of courts-martial – (1) … about his cancellation of leave and fact that he would be brought before me on the next day. 44. This witness further deposed that on 07.11.2008, he addressed to the Commander of my establishment in the briefing

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 22 2008

Lt. Cdr., M.P. Verma Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-22-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 3 to 5, 13, 13(1) and 13(2); Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 2(1), 6, 6(1), 54(2), 65A, 65B, 77(2), 93, 97, 97(6), 97(7) to 97(22), 99, 99(2), 101 to 103, 104, 105, 110, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 123, 124, 130, 133, 162 and 163; Evidence Act - Sections 27, 155 and 155(2); Army Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 100, 102 and 165; Naval Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Navy Rules - Rule 16; Navy (Disciplinary and Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 148, 148(1), 148(5), 149, 151, 153, 167, 168, 169, 172(5) and 242 to 244; Travel Regulations

Reported in : 156(2009)DLT41

TJA, my objection about the members of this August body is in terms of Section 97 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 97, Sub-section (12) provides that, the President of a Court Marital shall be named by the authority ordering

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 2013

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-23-2013

Subject : Education

27th August, 1991 passed by Admiral L.R. Ramdas, Chief of the Naval Staff under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 maintaining the conviction of the petitioner on all charges except the charge 20 and reducing the sentence of … of fact or evidence as defined therein, apply to disciplinary proceeding. When the authority accepts WP(C) No.6563/2011 page 44 of 80 that evidence and conclusion receives support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 2012

Umesh Kumar Singh Vs. the Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Eastern Na ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Decided on : Jan-05-2012

Subject : MRTP

thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.2) Did at about 19.20 hours on the 4th day of June, 1998 wrongfully confine Shri N.K.Marwaha, Branch Manager

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 2018

Kush Kalra vs.union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-05-2018

Subject : Education

Act, 1950; Section 12 of the Air Force Act, 1950 as well as Section 9 of the Indian Navy Act, 1957 contain specific and express provisions excluding women from eligibility for enrolment. In this regard, it may be useful … or privilege on the one side, nor disability on the other.” John Stuart Mill W.P.(C)No.10498/2015 Page 1 of 44 1. This writ petition, instituted in public interest by the petitioner, complains of institutional discrimination by the respondents

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 1998

The Union Carbide (India) Ltd. Vs. Ramesh Kumbla and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-15-1998

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 33; Industrial Disputes Act, 1985 - Sections 2; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 3(5), 28 and 44; Constitution of India - Article 227; Trade Union Act, 1926; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972

Reported in : 1999(1)ALLMR540; 1999(1)BomCR705; 1999(2)MhLj63

not include any such person - (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957; or (ii) who is employed in the Police service or as an officer or other employee of a … Court dismissing the petitioner's revision, it appears that the Industrial Court has misread and mis-interpreted the provisions of section 44 of the 1971 Act. While section 44 gives power to the Industrial Court to have superintendence over all

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 2014

Tarlochan Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Chandigarh Bench Chandimandir

Decided on : Jan-30-2014

Subject : Education

had availed of the remedies available to him under the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) or the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) as the case may be, and … counsel for the parties and have gone through the record of the case. 6. The relevant provisions of Section 44 of the Army Act read as under: œFalse answers on enrolment,- Any person having become subject to this

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial