Advanced Search Results

Gajendra Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 46, 47, 47(1), 80, 81 and 141(2); Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307, 323 and 452; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 41, 41(1) and 42; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 192, 439 and 475; Criminal Courts and Security Force Courts (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1969 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3 and 4; Constitution of India; Air Force Law

Reported in : 1995CriLJ3347; 1995(3)WLC635; 1995(2)WLN31

Court-martial. (1) The Central Government may make rules, consistent with this Code and the Army Act, 1950, the Navy Act, 1957, and the Air Force Act, 1950, and any other law, relating to the Armed Forces of the Union, … Rules. 1969 (in short, 'the Rules, 1969'), but those fall within Rule 42 and, therefore, such a case should not be tried by the Security … July, 1994, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Jodhpur, whereby he allowed the application dated 23-5-1994 filed under Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (in short, 'the Act') by the D. I. G., B.

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

27th August, 1991 passed by Admiral L.R. Ramdas, Chief of the Naval Staff under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 maintaining the conviction of the petitioner on all charges except the charge 20 and reducing the sentence of … also result in disqualification. The Supreme Court in S. Parthasarathi v. State of Andhra Pradesh 1974 (1) SLR 427, dealing with a similar question observed thus: The question then is: whether a real likelihood of bias existed

State Vs. Kawas Manekshaw Nanavati

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 75(2), 93 and 307; Constitution of India - Articles 72, 161 and 361; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 3(12), 53(16), 81(1), 82(10), 89(3), 122, 123, and 146; Supreme Court Rules - Order 21, Rule 5

Reported in : (1960)62BOMLR383; 1960CriLJ1558

was willing and ready to take the accused in naval custody as defined in S. 3(12) of the Navy Act, 1957, and that the accused would be detained under the orders of the Naval Provost Marshall in exercise of … the power of reprieve is to be found in Balmukand v. Emperor 42 Ind App 133 : AIR 1915 PC 29. The facts in this … Chainani, C.J.(1) In Criminal Reference No. 159 of 1959, which was made to this Court under Section 307 Cr. P. C. by the Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, a Division Bench of this Court, consisting of

Commander Ravinder Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Education

with a sentence of forfeiture of seniority of 12 calendar months awarded therein and deduction of mulcts for 42 days. 13. Petitioner filed statutory petition under Section 160, 161 and 162 of the Navy Act, 1957 by … convened then it cannot be dissolved except on the conditions which are mentioned in Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957 reads as under; “123. Provisions relating to dissolution of courts-martial – (1)

Lt. Cdr., M.P. Verma Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 3 to 5, 13, 13(1) and 13(2); Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 2(1), 6, 6(1), 54(2), 65A, 65B, 77(2), 93, 97, 97(6), 97(7) to 97(22), 99, 99(2), 101 to 103, 104, 105, 110, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 123, 124, 130, 133, 162 and 163; Evidence Act - Sections 27, 155 and 155(2); Army Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 100, 102 and 165; Naval Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Navy Rules - Rule 16; Navy (Disciplinary and Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 148, 148(1), 148(5), 149, 151, 153, 167, 168, 169, 172(5) and 242 to 244; Travel Regulations

Reported in : 156(2009)DLT41

TJA, my objection about the members of this August body is in terms of Section 97 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 97, Sub-section (12) provides that, the President of a Court Marital shall be named by the authority ordering … to trial as is apparent from the report of the MTNL in their affidavit at pages 413 to 424 of the paper book.(xiii) That the entire action taken by the C-in-C himself without involving the concerned officials

Umesh Kumar Singh Vs. the Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Eastern Na ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : MRTP

thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.2) Did at about 19.20 hours on the 4th day of June, 1998 wrongfully confine Shri N.K.Marwaha, Branch Manager

Ex Navy Direct Entry Artificers Association and Others Vs. the Union o ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Subject : MRTP

Navy Act, as per his submission. He further brought out that vide Sections 19A and 19B of the Navy Act, 1957 provisions still exist for Indian Naval Reserve Force and hence practice of keeping Sailors in Fleet Reserve on … of 10 years followed by liability to remain 10 years in Fleet Reserve. He further submitted that under Section 14 of the Navy Act, Sailors shall be liable to serve the Indian Navy or the Indian Naval

Kush Kalra vs.union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Act, 1950; Section 12 of the Air Force Act, 1950 as well as Section 9 of the Indian Navy Act, 1957 contain specific and express provisions excluding women from eligibility for enrolment. In this regard, it may be useful … process, it is stated that “gainfully employed civilians”, who fulfilled the prescribed criteria being graduates between 18 to 42 years, can apply in response to advertisements published in leading national newspapers and the Employment News in May-June

Srirupa Roy Vs. Lalit Kumar

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the complainant a monthly maintenance of Rs.59,170.92/- as is admissible under the provisions of Section 31 of the Navy Act, 1957, vide order dated 10.04.2023 issued by the Commander, CDR (P & A). The same reads as under:- “MAINTENANCE

Union Of India Vs. Parashotam Dass

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

(o) “service matters”, in relation to the persons subject to the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) and the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), mean all matters relating to the … of observations in S.N. Mukherjee v. Union of India9, more specifically paragraph 42, where the Supreme Court held that the High Courts, under Article 226, … order of a court or tribunal constituted by or under any law relating to the Armed Forces. Secondly, Section 31 of the said Act states that an appeal to this Court would only lie if “a point