Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: navy act 1957 section 41 · Page 1 of about 87 results (0.032 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 28 2011

Pradeep Kumar Singh Vs. the Union of India and 2 Others.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-28-2011

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 41(a), 74

desert his place of duty without prior permission, which is a serious offence under Section 41(a) of the Navy Act, 1957; when the appellant was caught by Mr. Pandey and questioned about his presence in the quarter, he ran

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 2000

Union of India and Others Vs. R.P. Yadav

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-10-2000

Subject : ServiceContract

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 3(20), 11, 14(1), 15, 16, 17, 18, 41 and 184(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Contract Act - Sections 18, 19; Indian Contract Act, 1982 - Sections 18(1)

Reported in : AIR2000SC2252; JT2000(6)SC371; 2000(4)SCALE600; (2000)5SCC325; [2000]Supp1SCR196; (2000)3UPLBEC2174

In our view the answer to the first question rests on the interpretation of relevant provisions of the, Navy Act, 1957, the Navy (Discipline and Misc. Provision) Regulation 1965 and Navy Order No. Str. 17 of 1994 regarding re-engagement … regarding pay, pension, etc. and maintenance of families.14. Chapter VIII contains the provisions regarding articles of war. In Section 41, it is provided inter alia that every person subject to naval law, who (a) deserts his post shall

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 2013

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-23-2013

Subject : Education

27th August, 1991 passed by Admiral L.R. Ramdas, Chief of the Naval Staff under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 maintaining the conviction of the petitioner on all charges except the charge 20 and reducing the sentence of … an order is passed without any evidence, the same must be held to be perverse.” (Underlining by us) 41. The respondents have not even ventured to give an explanation for this turn of events. We therefore, find

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 11 2009

Battula Veeraswamy Vs. the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and or ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-11-2009

Subject : Service

Acts : Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 1, 3, 5, 5A, 5D, 6, 6C, 6D, 7, 11, 14, 14A, 16, 17(1), 17(1C), 27 and 27A; Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rules 49(1), 50(1) and 50(2); Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1971 ;Constitution of India - Articles 36, 37, 41, 47 and 226; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Civil Service Regulations

Reported in : 2009(6)ALT464

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) ;(f) `Family pension' means `Family Pension, 1964', admissible under Rule 54 but does not include … violation thereof as punishable offences.11. A combined reading of Articles 36, 37, 41 and 47 of our Constitution makes it clear that the principles enunciated … The writ petitioner initially joined the services of Accounts Department on 6.11.1959. While he was working as a Section Officer (Accounts), he came on deputation to Mishra Dhatu Nigam Ltd, Hyderabad, a Government of India Undertaking (hereinafter

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 2010

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : Dec-08-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

executed whereas, no such modification was carried out, thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 60(a) of the Navy Act 1957. There is no dispute in regard to the fact that the appellant had signed the Work Completion Report … from 1.11.1990 to 15.3.1991 whereby the petitioner was held guilty for the offences under Sections 60(a), 54(2), 77(2), 41(2), 48(a) and 74 of the Navy Act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for twenty four calendar months,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 2010

In the Matter Of: R.P. Sharma Versus the Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : Mar-26-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

back for duty inspite of repeated communications. He was thus a deserter as per Section 49(2) of the Navy Act 1957 and not under Section 41 (a) of the Navy Act as stated by the applicant. He is not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 1995

Gajendra Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-25-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 46, 47, 47(1), 80, 81 and 141(2); Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307, 323 and 452; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 41, 41(1) and 42; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 192, 439 and 475; Criminal Courts and Security Force Courts (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1969 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3 and 4; Constitution of India; Air Force Law

Reported in : 1995CriLJ3347; 1995(3)WLC635; 1995(2)WLN31

Court-martial. (1) The Central Government may make rules, consistent with this Code and the Army Act, 1950, the Navy Act, 1957, and the Air Force Act, 1950, and any other law, relating to the Armed Forces of the Union, … that the offences levelled against the petitioner arc not covered under Rule 41 of the Border Security Force Rules. 1969 (in short, 'the Rules, 1969'), … July, 1994, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Jodhpur, whereby he allowed the application dated 23-5-1994 filed under Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (in short, 'the Act') by the D. I. G., B.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2001

Union of India and anr. Vs. P.D. Yadav

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-16-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964 - Regulation 15(2); Army Act, 1950 - Sections 71 and 73; Constitution of India - Articles 20 to 22 and 300A; Army Rules, 1950 - Rules 14, 14(5) and 15; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 27, 45, 47, 48, 81 and 82; Military Engineer Services Regulations, 1968; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 2-A(4), 3, 4 and 16; Army Pension Act - Sections 16; Financial Regulation, 1983 - Rule 133

Reported in : 2001IXAD(SC)30; [2001(91)FLR961]; JT2001(8)SC617; 2001LabIC4014; 2001(7)SCALE270; (2002)1SCC405; 2001(4)SCT1002(SC); 2002(1)SLJ299(SC); (2002)1UPLBEC118

the said office and to come afterwards and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 47(a) of the Navy Act, 1957. 3. Did on the Twenty ninth day of September one thousand nine hundred eighty nine at about 1402 … of ceiling fans at an exorbitant rate of Rs. 498/- per fan, while DGS&D; contract rate was Rs. 413.56 per fan. 3. At Dehradun, on 21.6.1985, while employed as CWE Dehradun with intent to defraud vide CA

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2008

G. Pratibha Raghuram W/O Shri G. Raghuram and S.K. Alwar F/O G. Pratib ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-25-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy Regulation; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 49, 49(1), 49(2), 51 and 183; Army Act, 1950; Evidence Act, 1872

Reported in : 2008(5)ALLMR335; 2009(1)BomCR210; (2008)110BOMLR2571

Board of Inquiry conducted by the respondents, it will be important to refer to certain provisions of the Navy Act, 1957 and also the Regulations framed under the Act. We are concerned with only Section 49(1), and the bare … for benefits entitled on such basis - Petition allowed - CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 [C.A. No. 2/1974]. Section 41: [ Swatanter Kumar, CJ, Smt Ranjana Desai & D.B. Bhosale, JJ] Arrest of accused - Held, A Police

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 29 2012

Commander Ravinder Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : May-29-2012

Subject : Education

convened then it cannot be dissolved except on the conditions which are mentioned in Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957 reads as under; “123. Provisions relating to dissolution of courts-martial – (1) … the prosecution has examined PW-2 Capt Philipose G Pynumootil, PW-4 Cdr S.K. Sridhar and PW-16 Cdr NSS Parmar. 41. PW-2 Capt Philipose G Pynumootil deposed that he resumed his charge of Naval Air Station Kunjali on 31.03.2007

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial