Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: navy act 1957 section 40 · Page 1 of about 102 results (0.036 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 23 2013

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-23-2013

Subject : Education

27th August, 1991 passed by Admiral L.R. Ramdas, Chief of the Naval Staff under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 maintaining the conviction of the petitioner on all charges except the charge 20 and reducing the sentence of … to take water of certain streams without permission of the mill owners. While answering the WP(C) No.6563/2011 page 40 of 80 question in negative, Blackburn, J.evolved the following rule:“… There is no doubt that any direct pecuniary

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2011

Ex Cdre. Narinder Pandit Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : May-19-2011

Subject : Right to Information

and messing was provided at the outstation, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 60(d) of the Navy Act, 1957. (2) Did on 19th Aug 2002 knowingly make a fraudulent statement in a document, namely Temporary Duty Claim … relating to the charge shall be obtained and such statement shall be included in the summary of evidence.” 40. The Navy Instructions 95/69 are also reproduced hereunder: “95. Classification of Moves on Attachment of Officers to other

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 2004

Commodore Narinder M. Pandit S/O Late Munshi Ram Arjundas Pandit Vs. t ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-24-2004

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2004(4)BomCR814; (2004)106BOMLR98

Court Martial. The charge-sheet was issued against the petitioner alleging that the petitioner has committed various offences under Navy Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Navy Act') as well as certain offences punishable under the Prevention of … of the petitioners were overruled and the Court Martial proceeded further. The petitioner was arraigned in terms of Section 106 of the Navy Act and the petitioner pleaded not guilty to all the charges.4. The contentions raised … by the learned Additional Solicitor General are as under :(i) The Rule 40 of the Army Rules, 1954, specifically provides that the members of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 14 2007

Ex. Commodore Narinder M. Pandit Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-14-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 54(2), 60, 77(2), 81 and 82(3); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Army Act - Sections 71 and 73; Navy Pension Regulations - Regulations 15, 15(2) and 16

Reported in : 147(2008)DLT74; 2008(100)DRJ735; 2008(3)SLJ363(Delhi)

and messing was provided at the outstation, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 60(d) of the Navy Act, 1957.(2) Did on 19th Aug 2002 knowingly make a fraudulent statement in a document, namely Temporary Duty Claim CG/3224NM

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 29 2012

Commander Ravinder Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : May-29-2012

Subject : Education

petitioner under Section 48(c) of the Navy Act, 1957. Hence, charge no. 4 stands proved against the petitioners. 40. Now coming to the next Charge No. 6 which relates to in violation of Section 47(c) of the … convened then it cannot be dissolved except on the conditions which are mentioned in Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957 reads as under; “123. Provisions relating to dissolution of courts-martial – (1)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 1998

Commander V.S. Batra Vs. Chief of the Naval Staff, Naval Headquarters( ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-27-1998

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 79

Reported in : 1998VAD(Delhi)91; 74(1998)DLT810; 1998(47)DRJ130

There was no conspiracy and the convening of the court martial was barred under Section 79 of the Navy Act, 1957.3. On the 29th of September, 1997, the Director of Personnel Services wrote the petitioner stating that since the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 22 2008

Lt. Cdr., M.P. Verma Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-22-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 3 to 5, 13, 13(1) and 13(2); Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 2(1), 6, 6(1), 54(2), 65A, 65B, 77(2), 93, 97, 97(6), 97(7) to 97(22), 99, 99(2), 101 to 103, 104, 105, 110, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 123, 124, 130, 133, 162 and 163; Evidence Act - Sections 27, 155 and 155(2); Army Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 100, 102 and 165; Naval Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Navy Rules - Rule 16; Navy (Disciplinary and Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 148, 148(1), 148(5), 149, 151, 153, 167, 168, 169, 172(5) and 242 to 244; Travel Regulations

Reported in : 156(2009)DLT41

TJA, my objection about the members of this August body is in terms of Section 97 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 97, Sub-section (12) provides that, the President of a Court Marital shall be named by the authority ordering

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 2012

Umesh Kumar Singh Vs. the Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Eastern Na ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Decided on : Jan-05-2012

Subject : MRTP

thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.2) Did at about 19.20 hours on the 4th day of June, 1998 wrongfully confine Shri N.K.Marwaha, Branch Manager … by the accused comes to the tune of Rs.2,54,371/-. Through P.W.14, Exhibits P-39A, P-39B and P-40A to P- 40D were marked. Exhibits P-39A and P-39B are letters dated 4.6.1998 to Sub-Inspector of Police from P.W.14. Exhibit P-40A

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 17 2003

NitIn Shankar Kadkol Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-17-2003

Subject : CriminalFamily

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 304B and 498A; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 77(2), 113 and 114

Reported in : I(2004)DMC695; 2004(2)MhLj767

thereby committed an offence under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957 and (b) that on 29-1-1994 between 2000 Hrs. and 2300 Hrs. the petitioner caused death of Padma by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2011

K.C. Shibu Vs. Union of India, Represented by Secretary to the Governm ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Decided on : May-19-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

08° 19.62'N 73° 03.4'E off Minicoy island and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 55(2) of the Navy Act 1957. ii. Charge 2. Between 25th day of November 2003 and 29th day of November 2003 contravene Regulation 1331 … book. When shown entries of visual fixes in the OOW note book between 07 00 hours and 07 40 hours on 25.11.2003, the PW.2 stated that these 9 entries were made subsequently at the directions of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial