Advanced Search Results
Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors
Delhi
Sep-23-2013
Education
27th August, 1991 passed by Admiral L.R. Ramdas, Chief of the Naval Staff under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 maintaining the conviction of the petitioner on all charges except the charge 20 and reducing the sentence of … to take water of certain streams without permission of the mill owners. While answering the WP(C) No.6563/2011 page 40 of 80 question in negative, Blackburn, J.evolved the following rule:“… There is no doubt that any direct pecuniary
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEx Cdre. Narinder Pandit Vs. Union of India and Others
Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi
May-19-2011
Right to Information
and messing was provided at the outstation, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 60(d) of the Navy Act, 1957. (2) Did on 19th Aug 2002 knowingly make a fraudulent statement in a document, namely Temporary Duty Claim … relating to the charge shall be obtained and such statement shall be included in the summary of evidence.â 40. The Navy Instructions 95/69 are also reproduced hereunder: â95. Classification of Moves on Attachment of Officers to other
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommodore Narinder M. Pandit S/O Late Munshi Ram Arjundas Pandit Vs. t ...
Mumbai
Mar-24-2004
Criminal
2004(4)BomCR814; (2004)106BOMLR98
Court Martial. The charge-sheet was issued against the petitioner alleging that the petitioner has committed various offences under Navy Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Navy Act') as well as certain offences punishable under the Prevention of … of the petitioners were overruled and the Court Martial proceeded further. The petitioner was arraigned in terms of Section 106 of the Navy Act and the petitioner pleaded not guilty to all the charges.4. The contentions raised … by the learned Additional Solicitor General are as under :(i) The Rule 40 of the Army Rules, 1954, specifically provides that the members of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ex. Commodore Narinder M. Pandit Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Dec-14-2007
Service
Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 54(2), 60, 77(2), 81 and 82(3); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Army Act - Sections 71 and 73; Navy Pension Regulations - Regulations 15, 15(2) and 16
147(2008)DLT74; 2008(100)DRJ735; 2008(3)SLJ363(Delhi)
and messing was provided at the outstation, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 60(d) of the Navy Act, 1957.(2) Did on 19th Aug 2002 knowingly make a fraudulent statement in a document, namely Temporary Duty Claim CG/3224NM
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommander Ravinder Singh Vs. Union of India and Others
Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi
May-29-2012
Education
petitioner under Section 48(c) of the Navy Act, 1957. Hence, charge no. 4 stands proved against the petitioners. 40. Now coming to the next Charge No. 6 which relates to in violation of Section 47(c) of the … convened then it cannot be dissolved except on the conditions which are mentioned in Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957 reads as under; â123. Provisions relating to dissolution of courts-martial â (1)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommander V.S. Batra Vs. Chief of the Naval Staff, Naval Headquarters( ...
Delhi
Jul-27-1998
Service
Constitution of India - Article 227; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 79
1998VAD(Delhi)91; 74(1998)DLT810; 1998(47)DRJ130
There was no conspiracy and the convening of the court martial was barred under Section 79 of the Navy Act, 1957.3. On the 29th of September, 1997, the Director of Personnel Services wrote the petitioner stating that since the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLt. Cdr., M.P. Verma Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Delhi
Oct-22-2008
Service
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 3 to 5, 13, 13(1) and 13(2); Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 2(1), 6, 6(1), 54(2), 65A, 65B, 77(2), 93, 97, 97(6), 97(7) to 97(22), 99, 99(2), 101 to 103, 104, 105, 110, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 123, 124, 130, 133, 162 and 163; Evidence Act - Sections 27, 155 and 155(2); Army Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 100, 102 and 165; Naval Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Navy Rules - Rule 16; Navy (Disciplinary and Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 148, 148(1), 148(5), 149, 151, 153, 167, 168, 169, 172(5) and 242 to 244; Travel Regulations
156(2009)DLT41
TJA, my objection about the members of this August body is in terms of Section 97 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 97, Sub-section (12) provides that, the President of a Court Marital shall be named by the authority ordering
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUmesh Kumar Singh Vs. the Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Eastern Na ...
Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai
Jan-05-2012
MRTP
thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.2) Did at about 19.20 hours on the 4th day of June, 1998 wrongfully confine Shri N.K.Marwaha, Branch Manager … by the accused comes to the tune of Rs.2,54,371/-. Through P.W.14, Exhibits P-39A, P-39B and P-40A to P- 40D were marked. Exhibits P-39A and P-39B are letters dated 4.6.1998 to Sub-Inspector of Police from P.W.14. Exhibit P-40A
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNitIn Shankar Kadkol Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Mumbai
Dec-17-2003
CriminalFamily
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 304B and 498A; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 77(2), 113 and 114
I(2004)DMC695; 2004(2)MhLj767
thereby committed an offence under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957 and (b) that on 29-1-1994 between 2000 Hrs. and 2300 Hrs. the petitioner caused death of Padma by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.C. Shibu Vs. Union of India, Represented by Secretary to the Governm ...
Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi
May-19-2011
Land Acquisition
08° 19.62'N 73° 03.4'E off Minicoy island and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 55(2) of the Navy Act 1957. ii. Charge 2. Between 25th day of November 2003 and 29th day of November 2003 contravene Regulation 1331 … book. When shown entries of visual fixes in the OOW note book between 07 00 hours and 07 40 hours on 25.11.2003, the PW.2 stated that these 9 entries were made subsequently at the directions of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »