Advanced Search Results

M.E.S. Employees Union, A.P. Area, Secunderabad Vs. Govt. of A.P. and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Tax on Professions, Trades, Callings and Employees Act, 1987 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6(2), 27-A, 31, 32 and 35; Financial Regulations - Regulation 288-A; Army Act, 1950; Constitution of India - Article 276; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950

Reported in : [2002]126STC523(AP)

learned Counsel, Regulation 288-A reads :--'A person subject to the Army Act, 1950 (Act XLVI of 1950) the Navy Act, 1957/the Air Force Act, 1950, who is compelled by the exigencies of Army/ Navy/Air Force duty to reside within … to pay the tax. The learned Counsel also referred to the provisions of Section 32 as well as Section 35 in support of his contention that the profession tax levied under the present Act is only for the

The State Of Sikkim Vs. Jasbir Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

the CrPC has empowered the Central Government to make rules consistent with the CrPC and the Army Act, Navy Act 1957 and the Air Force Act 1950 and any other law relating to the Armed Forces of the Union, … created by the Army Act, such as those provided under Sections 34, 35, 36 and 37, which are exclusively triable by a court- martial; (b) … a judgment of a Single Judge of the High Court of Sikkim. While exercising the revisional jurisdiction under Sections 397 and 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 19731, the High Court has

Chittaranjan Das Vs. Durgapore Project Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Apprentice Act, 1961 - Section 18; ;Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 99CWN897,(1996)IIILLJ188Cal

- (i) who is subject to the Army Act, 1950. or the Air Force Act, 1950 or the Navy Act, 1957:or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of a … an act performed by a Public Officer in exercise of his statutory duty, is admissible in evidence under Section 35 of the Evidence Act. He further submitted that even if any discrepancy exists between the age recorded in

Commander Ravinder Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Education

convened then it cannot be dissolved except on the conditions which are mentioned in Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957 reads as under; “123. Provisions relating to dissolution of courts-martial – (1) … officers of the executive branch of the naval service, and (b) at trials for offences against sections 34, 35, 55 [55A, 55c] and 56, officers other than officers of the executive branch of the naval service shall

Ex Cdre. Narinder Pandit Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

and messing was provided at the outstation, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 60(d) of the Navy Act, 1957. (2) Did on 19th Aug 2002 knowingly make a fraudulent statement in a document, namely Temporary Duty Claim

Ex. Commodore Narinder M. Pandit Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 54(2), 60, 77(2), 81 and 82(3); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Army Act - Sections 71 and 73; Navy Pension Regulations - Regulations 15, 15(2) and 16

Reported in : 147(2008)DLT74; 2008(100)DRJ735; 2008(3)SLJ363(Delhi)

and messing was provided at the outstation, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 60(d) of the Navy Act, 1957.(2) Did on 19th Aug 2002 knowingly make a fraudulent statement in a document, namely Temporary Duty Claim CG/3224NM … No. MOPR/CMT-1/01098/087/2002/DG- 29 dated 17 May 2002 and 8400 pieces Size 18 Sailors Suitcases valued at approximately Rs. 35 Lakhs vide CPRO(MB) Order No. MOPR/CMT-1/01111/098/2002/DG- 559 dated 15 Jun 02, at his residence 311, Block 23, Arjun

Umesh Kumar Singh Vs. the Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Eastern Na ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : MRTP

thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.2) Did at about 19.20 hours on the 4th day of June, 1998 wrongfully confine Shri N.K.Marwaha, Branch Manager

M.K. Mishra Vs. Union of India, Represented by the Secretary and Anoth ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Subject : Land Acquisition

guilty of the charge under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957 and was accordingly dismissed from the service. 2. In this order we will not disclose the identity of … (appeal) challenging the verdict of the Court Martial, whereby he was found guilty of the charge under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957 and was accordingly dismissed

Sh. Raj Kumar M.E.-i Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

contended that their trial was already over and that they were tried under Section 93 (2) of the Navy Act, 1957 and the case against them was also established. 24. The respondents further contended that the petitioner was given … tried by the court martial or summary trial by the Commanding Officer. 12. Relying on AIR 1982 SC 35, the petitioner contended that the Commanding Officer is not to take the case in a informal way and

Kush Kalra vs.union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Act, 1950; Section 12 of the Air Force Act, 1950 as well as Section 9 of the Indian Navy Act, 1957 contain specific and express provisions excluding women from eligibility for enrolment. In this regard, it may be useful … irrational and a clear case of discrimination and granted relief to the petitioners. W.P.(C)No.10498/2015 Page 21 of 44 35. Article 14 of the Constitution of India provides that the State shall not deny to any person equality