Advanced Search Results

Mangal Singh Bhatti Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 78, 78(1) and 78(2); Navy Regulations - Regulations 28, 30, 149 and 151; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of jurisdiction) Rules, 1978 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 9; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 192, 209, 240, 246(1), 252, 254, 255(1), 255(2), 256(1), 257, 475 and 475(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 549

Reported in : 1993CriLJ3070

seeking transfer of the case of the detenu to the Commanding Officer, INS Venduruthy, for trial under the Navy Act, 1957, and in accordance with the provisions of Section 78 of the Navy Act, 475 of the Cr.P.C. and … 28-3-1992. But in respect of an incident which took place on 29-2-1992, he was taken into custody on 30-3-1992 by the naval authorities. Thereafter his wife filed a habeas corpus application, O.P. No. 4550 of 1992, to

Ex-surgeon Commander Bhaskar Roy Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Navy Act - Sections 81(1)(b) and 82(4); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354

Reported in : 1998(1)MhLj220

was found guilty under section 354, Indian Penal Code and under Sections 68, 77(2) and 74 of the Navy Act, 1957 and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 24 calendar months. He was also dismissed with disgrace from the Naval … 354 of the Indian Penal Code. Charge No. 3 : Was between 1330 hours and 1500 hours on 30 January, 1995 guilty of an act to the prejudice of good order and naval discipline in that he

District Forest Officer, Madurai Division Vs. P. Ganesan (Died) and or ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 2, 2(1), 30, 30(1) and 30(2); Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 28; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; ;Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 - Rules 36 and 43; Constitution of India - Article 226; Limitation Act - Sections 5

Reported in : 2007ACJ1521; [2007(112)FLR561]; (2006)4MLJ1653

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee … 2002 (1) CTC 675. In paragraph 8 of thejudgment a specific point was raised and taking note of Section 30 of the workman compensation Act, enabling the party against whom the award passed, provides for an appeal remedy,

Commopore C.P. George Vs. Chief of Naval Staff

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 81, 81(1), 82, 82(20), 93 and 94(2)

Reported in : 58(1995)DLT578

are of the view that the Chief of Naval Staff has such a power.(15) Section 81(l)(n) of the Navy Act, 1957 permits other minor punishments which were being imposed by 'custom' to be imposed. Section 82 deals with the … promotions.(5) On the basis that petitioner was to retire as Commodore on completion of 54 years (i.e. on 30-4-93) tile pension papers were moved. According to petitioners, if his name continues in the Select List, as on

Capt. N. Gopalakrishnan (Retired) Vs. Union of India, Rep by the Secre ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : Service

“3(o) ‘Service matters, in relation to the persons subject to the Army Act 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act 1957 (62 of 1957) and the Air Force Act 1950 (45 of 1950), mean all matters relating to the … interim order or any decision of this Tribunal, the appeal lies only to the Honourable Supreme Court under Section 30 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act 2007. Under such circumstances, the order passed by this Tribunal in O.A.No.22

Union of India and Others Vs. R.P. Yadav

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceContract

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 3(20), 11, 14(1), 15, 16, 17, 18, 41 and 184(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Contract Act - Sections 18, 19; Indian Contract Act, 1982 - Sections 18(1)

Reported in : AIR2000SC2252; JT2000(6)SC371; 2000(4)SCALE600; (2000)5SCC325; [2000]Supp1SCR196; (2000)3UPLBEC2174

In our view the answer to the first question rests on the interpretation of relevant provisions of the, Navy Act, 1957, the Navy (Discipline and Misc. Provision) Regulation 1965 and Navy Order No. Str. 17 of 1994 regarding re-engagement … Misc. Provision) Regulation 1965 and Navy Order No. Str. 17 of 1994 regarding re-engagement of 'Sailors' (RP/0805/93). In Section 3(20) 'sailor' is defined as a person in the naval service other than an officer. In Section 11, … subject inter alia to the exceptions recognised statutorily in Sections 19 to 30 of the Contract Act. Here we are concerned with Raj Kumar's plea

Union of India and anr. Vs. P.D. Yadav

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964 - Regulation 15(2); Army Act, 1950 - Sections 71 and 73; Constitution of India - Articles 20 to 22 and 300A; Army Rules, 1950 - Rules 14, 14(5) and 15; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 27, 45, 47, 48, 81 and 82; Military Engineer Services Regulations, 1968; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 2-A(4), 3, 4 and 16; Army Pension Act - Sections 16; Financial Regulation, 1983 - Rule 133

Reported in : 2001IXAD(SC)30; [2001(91)FLR961]; JT2001(8)SC617; 2001LabIC4014; 2001(7)SCALE270; (2002)1SCC405; 2001(4)SCT1002(SC); 2002(1)SLJ299(SC); (2002)1UPLBEC118

Matched in: Citation 2001IXAD(SC)30; [2001(91)FLR961]; JT2001(8)SC617; 2001LabIC4014; 2001(7)SCALE270; (2002)1SCC405; 2001(4)SCT1002(SC); 2002(1)SLJ299(SC); (2002)1UPLBEC118

Ajay Kumar Singh Vs. Flag officer Commanding and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

affirmed the conviction of the appellants under Sections 342 and 392 IPC read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957 and modified the sentence of imprisonment to that of the period already undergone by them. Appellant Dhirendra Kumar … the test identification parade ought not to have been disbelieved by the tribunal. In exercise of power under Section 30 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, this Court normally does not re-appreciate the evidence and slow to interfere

Union of India and Ors. Vs. Major General Shri Kant Sharma and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

commission, appointments, enrolment and conditions of service in respect of persons subject to the Army Act, 1950, the Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force At, 1950 and also to provide for appeals arising out of orders, findings or … JUDGMENT SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J In these appeals the question raised is whether the right of appeal under Section 30 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the 'ct'), against an order of Armed

Kush Kalra vs.union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Act, 1950; Section 12 of the Air Force Act, 1950 as well as Section 9 of the Indian Navy Act, 1957 contain specific and express provisions excluding women from eligibility for enrolment. In this regard, it may be useful … Association of India & Ors., the Supreme Court was concerned with a challenge to the Constitutional validity of Section 30 of the Punjab Excise Act, 1914 which prohibited employment of “any man under the age of 25 years”