Advanced Search Results

M/S. Birla Jute and Industries Ltd. Vs. Rajeshwar Mahato and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10(1) and 25-F;; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 254;; Industrial Employment (Standing Order) Act, 1946;; Industrial Disputes Amendment Act, 1982;; Air Force Act, 1950;; Army Act, 1950;; Navy Act, 1957;; Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 29(2)

Reported in : (1998)2CALLT83(HC),[1998(80)FLR985],(1999)ILLJ957Cal

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950). or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950). or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other or … below the appellant raised a plea that the first respondent is not a workman within the meaning of section 2(s) of the industrial Disputes Act, 1947 as he was incharge of one of the three shifts of … of Goa was a special law. In view of provision of section 29(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963 it was held that the provision of

Commander Ravinder Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Education

convened then it cannot be dissolved except on the conditions which are mentioned in Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957 reads as under; “123. Provisions relating to dissolution of courts-martial – (1) … Petitioner vide this petition has prayed to quash and set aside the impugned order (findings and sentence) dated 29.04.2009 of the court martial and order dated 25.06.2009 of the Chief of Naval Staff in judicial review of

Voltas Employees Union Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 19, 19(2) and 29; ;Air Force Act, 1950; ;Navy Act, 1957

Reported in : 2004IAD(Delhi)233; 108(2003)DLT649; (2004)ILLJ1025Del

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) Who is employed mainly in the police service or as an officer or … respondent No. 1, Secretary Labour, Government of NCT of Delhi, for directions to prosecute respondent No. 2 under Section 29 of the Industrial Disputes Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). By the impugned order dated 5th May,

Commander V.S. Batra Vs. Chief of the Naval Staff, Naval Headquarters( ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 79

Reported in : 1998VAD(Delhi)91; 74(1998)DLT810; 1998(47)DRJ130

There was no conspiracy and the convening of the court martial was barred under Section 79 of the Navy Act, 1957.3. On the 29th of September, 1997, the Director of Personnel Services wrote the petitioner stating that since the … the convening of the court martial was barred under Section 79 of the Navy Act, 1957.3. On the 29th of September, 1997, the Director of Personnel Services wrote the petitioner stating that since the court martial had

Union of India Vs. Cdr. Ravindra v. Desai

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

Martial. Ten charges were framed against the respondent. Seven out of which were under Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘the Act”) read with Section 509 of the Indian Penal Code (‘IPC’) and … charges which led to the court martial Criminal Appeal No.579 of 2016 a/w connected matter Page 1 of 29 proceedings against him. Court Martial returned the finding of ‘guilty’ on all charges which led to imposition of

Union of India vs Lt Col Mukul Dev

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Air Force Act 1950 or sentence of death in terms of Section 71 (1) (a) of the Navy Act, 1957, coupled with the factum that the decision of the Tribunal is final in terms of Section 29 of

P.D. Yadav Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Navy Pension Rules, 1964 - Rule 15(2)

Reported in : 1997IIAD(Delhi)901; 66(1997)DLT832; 1997(41)DRJ172

M. Jagannadha Rao, J.(1) These two writ petitions arising under the Navy Act, 1957 have been referred to a Full bench for being disposed of Along with Cwp 2813/94, 2866/90 and 4706/94 … 1980. He was charge-sheeted in January 1990 and tried by a General Court Martial on 5 charges under Sections 43, 47 and 48 of the Navy Act, found guilty of the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th charges … Teacher Ex. N. Sub. R.K. Sharma vs. Chief of Army Staff (dated 29.4.80) (SC) for contending that in the above cases where under Section 71

Union of India and Others Vs. R.P. Yadav

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceContract

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 3(20), 11, 14(1), 15, 16, 17, 18, 41 and 184(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Contract Act - Sections 18, 19; Indian Contract Act, 1982 - Sections 18(1)

Reported in : AIR2000SC2252; JT2000(6)SC371; 2000(4)SCALE600; (2000)5SCC325; [2000]Supp1SCR196; (2000)3UPLBEC2174

In our view the answer to the first question rests on the interpretation of relevant provisions of the, Navy Act, 1957, the Navy (Discipline and Misc. Provision) Regulation 1965 and Navy Order No. Str. 17 of 1994 regarding re-engagement … Misc. Provision) Regulation 1965 and Navy Order No. Str. 17 of 1994 regarding re-engagement of 'Sailors' (RP/0805/93). In Section 3(20) 'sailor' is defined as a person in the naval service other than an officer. In Section 11,

Sh. Raj Kumar M.E.-i Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

contended that their trial was already over and that they were tried under Section 93 (2) of the Navy Act, 1957 and the case against them was also established. 24. The respondents further contended that the petitioner was given … Entry Recruit (MER). He was posted on various ships on various dates. For an incident that occurred on 29th October, 1994, a signal dated 2nd August, 1995 was received from INS Vikrant at Calcutta for sending the

Chandrasekharasharma Vs. C. Krishnaiah Chetty

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution Of India - Articles 226, 227; Industrial Disputes Act - Section 3, 1947 - Sections 10(1)(c), 2(s), 2(oo)(bb), 2(b), 2(rr); andhra pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, 1988 - section 48(1); Sales Act - Section 1(4); Dock Workers Act 1948 - Section 5A; Sales Promotion Employees (Conditions of Service) Act, 1976 ; Workmen's Compensation Act. 1923; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 Maternity Benefit Act, 1961; Payment of Bonus Act. 1965; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Navy Act 1934; Plantation Labour Act, 1951 - Section 2; Industrial Disputes (ID) Act; Amending Act 1982;

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950, (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee … in full and final settlement of accounts. Petitioner was also informed that this action was in accordance with section 2(oo)(bb) of Industrial Disputes Act. Aggrieved by the said action petitioner raised a dispute before the Labour Commissioner … amended by amending Act 36 of 1956 which came into force from 29.08.1956. It was further amended by amending Act 46 of 1982 with effect