Advanced Search Results

Mangal Singh Bhatti Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 78, 78(1) and 78(2); Navy Regulations - Regulations 28, 30, 149 and 151; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of jurisdiction) Rules, 1978 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 9; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 192, 209, 240, 246(1), 252, 254, 255(1), 255(2), 256(1), 257, 475 and 475(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 549

Reported in : 1993CriLJ3070

seeking transfer of the case of the detenu to the Commanding Officer, INS Venduruthy, for trial under the Navy Act, 1957, and in accordance with the provisions of Section 78 of the Navy Act, 475 of the Cr.P.C. and … Command. He had 15 years of service, and opted for voluntary retirement. He was to be relieved on 28-3-1992 at Bombay, and before going to Bombay he was to be relieved from his unit on 28-3-1992. But

District Forest Officer, Madurai Division Vs. P. Ganesan (Died) and or ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 2, 2(1), 30, 30(1) and 30(2); Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 28; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; ;Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 - Rules 36 and 43; Constitution of India - Article 226; Limitation Act - Sections 5

Reported in : 2007ACJ1521; [2007(112)FLR561]; (2006)4MLJ1653

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee … to entertain the claim petition of a Government servant, is also unsustainable, in view of the fact that Section 28 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, exempts the Industrial Tribunal, Labour Court or any other authority constituted under

P.D. Yadav Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Navy Pension Rules, 1964 - Rule 15(2)

Reported in : 1997IIAD(Delhi)901; 66(1997)DLT832; 1997(41)DRJ172

M. Jagannadha Rao, J.(1) These two writ petitions arising under the Navy Act, 1957 have been referred to a Full bench for being disposed of Along with Cwp 2813/94, 2866/90 and 4706/94 … 1980. He was charge-sheeted in January 1990 and tried by a General Court Martial on 5 charges under Sections 43, 47 and 48 of the Navy Act, found guilty of the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th charges … referred to a Full bench for being disposed of Along with Cwp 2813/94, 2866/90 and 4706/94 arising under the Indian Army Act, 1950. We have

Union of India and Others Vs. R.P. Yadav

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceContract

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 3(20), 11, 14(1), 15, 16, 17, 18, 41 and 184(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Contract Act - Sections 18, 19; Indian Contract Act, 1982 - Sections 18(1)

Reported in : AIR2000SC2252; JT2000(6)SC371; 2000(4)SCALE600; (2000)5SCC325; [2000]Supp1SCR196; (2000)3UPLBEC2174

In our view the answer to the first question rests on the interpretation of relevant provisions of the, Navy Act, 1957, the Navy (Discipline and Misc. Provision) Regulation 1965 and Navy Order No. Str. 17 of 1994 regarding re-engagement … Misc. Provision) Regulation 1965 and Navy Order No. Str. 17 of 1994 regarding re-engagement of 'Sailors' (RP/0805/93). In Section 3(20) 'sailor' is defined as a person in the naval service other than an officer. In Section 11, … counter-affidavit to the writ petition, 'the contract (of re-engagement) was complete.'44. On 28-11-1996, this Court in Anuj Kumar Dey v. Union of India, : (1997)1SCC366

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

the provisions of this Act would apply to the persons who are subject to the Army Act, 1950, Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950. It will also apply to the retired Army personnel, including their dependents, … jurisdiction, as evidenced by Section 256 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956, Section 27 of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Section 26 of Gift Tax Act, 1958, and Section 18 of Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964. Similarly, there are … of the High Courts and the Supreme Court under Articles 226/227 and 32 of the Constitution, are unconstitutional. Section 28 of the Act and the 'exclusion of jurisdiction' clauses in all other legislations enacted under the aegis of

The Union Carbide (India) Ltd. Vs. Ramesh Kumbla and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 33; Industrial Disputes Act, 1985 - Sections 2; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 3(5), 28 and 44; Constitution of India - Article 227; Trade Union Act, 1926; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972

Reported in : 1999(1)ALLMR540; 1999(1)BomCR705; 1999(2)MhLj63

not include any such person - (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957; or (ii) who is employed in the Police service or as an officer or other employee of a … the petitioner seeks to do by the present petition.3. The complaint was filed by the first respondent under section 28 of the 1971 Act alleging that the petitioner had committed unfair labour practices mentioned in Item Nos. 1(a),

Commopore C.P. George Vs. Chief of Naval Staff

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 81, 81(1), 82, 82(20), 93 and 94(2)

Reported in : 58(1995)DLT578

are of the view that the Chief of Naval Staff has such a power.(15) Section 81(l)(n) of the Navy Act, 1957 permits other minor punishments which were being imposed by 'custom' to be imposed. Section 82 deals with the … M. Jagannadha Rao, C. J.(1) These two writ petitions are connected and can be disposed of togother.(2) Cwp 2852193 was filed on 29-5-93 praying for quashing of a 'censure' awarded to the petitioner by the Chief of

NitIn Shankar Kadkol Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalFamily

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 304B and 498A; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 77(2), 113 and 114

Reported in : I(2004)DMC695; 2004(2)MhLj767

thereby committed an offence under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957 and (b) that on 29-1-1994 between 2000 Hrs. and 2300 Hrs. the petitioner caused death of Padma by … INS Angre dated 13-12-1996 in which it was alleged that (a) on 29-1-1994 while he was residing at 28, Khukri Hostel, Navy Nagar, Colaba, he subjected his wife-Padma to cruelty and harassment with a view to coerce

Union of India and anr. Vs. P.D. Yadav

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964 - Regulation 15(2); Army Act, 1950 - Sections 71 and 73; Constitution of India - Articles 20 to 22 and 300A; Army Rules, 1950 - Rules 14, 14(5) and 15; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 27, 45, 47, 48, 81 and 82; Military Engineer Services Regulations, 1968; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 2-A(4), 3, 4 and 16; Army Pension Act - Sections 16; Financial Regulation, 1983 - Rule 133

Reported in : 2001IXAD(SC)30; [2001(91)FLR961]; JT2001(8)SC617; 2001LabIC4014; 2001(7)SCALE270; (2002)1SCC405; 2001(4)SCT1002(SC); 2002(1)SLJ299(SC); (2002)1UPLBEC118

the said office and to come afterwards and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 47(a) of the Navy Act, 1957. 3. Did on the Twenty ninth day of September one thousand nine hundred eighty nine at about 1402 … 20.1.1993 in the High Court. After the filing of the said writ petition, an order was passed on 28.3.1994 forfeiting 50% of the pensionary benefits. The High Court partly allowed his writ petition and remanded the case

Ajay Kumar Singh Vs. Flag officer Commanding and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

affirmed the conviction of the appellants under Sections 342 and 392 IPC read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957 and modified the sentence of imprisonment to that of the period already undergone by them. Appellant Dhirendra Kumar … 30.07.1998. Appellant DK Singh was arrested at Howrah Railway Station on 24.07.1998 and thereafter brought to Visakhapatnam on 28.07.1998. On 30.07.1998 all three persons were remanded to custody in central jail, Visakhapatnam. Based on the statement of