Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: navy act 1957 section 25 · Page 1 of about 241 results (0.035 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 24 2004

Commodore Narinder M. Pandit S/O Late Munshi Ram Arjundas Pandit Vs. t ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-24-2004

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2004(4)BomCR814; (2004)106BOMLR98

Court Martial. The charge-sheet was issued against the petitioner alleging that the petitioner has committed various offences under Navy Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Navy Act') as well as certain offences punishable under the Prevention of … the fact that the officer of the equivalent rank is not available for being appointed as Judge Advocate.(iv) Section 25 of the said Act of 1988 gives overriding effect to the provisions of the Army Act and the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 2005

Brijesh Narayan Vs. Rajasthan State Co-operative Bank Ltd. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-09-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 25; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Rajasthan Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1958 - Sections 3

Reported in : RLW2006(1)Raj210

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee … assigning any reason. The petitioner alleged that his termination from service w.e.f. 23.11.1992 is retrenchment as defined under Section 2(oo) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1947') and the same … effected without adhering mandatory condition precedent for retrenchment as prescribed under Section 25(0) of the Act of 1947, as such the same is void ab

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 1997

Yadamma T. Vs. National Remote Sensing Agency and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-17-1997

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25-F; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Sections 2; Navy Act, 1957; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950

Reported in : 1997(4)ALD415; 1997(4)ALT578; 1997(2)APLJ107

- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Army Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957 in (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of a … that it is not established that the appellant was in the regular employment of the establishment and thus Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act is not attracted. Appellant - second respondent in the writ petition has

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 12 2012

Gajanan Gangaram Patil and Others Vs. M/S. Relene Petrochemicals Ltd. ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-12-2012

Subject : Labour and Industrial

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (II) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … difficulties. 3 On 20 March, 2003, a Closure permission was granted by the State Government to NOCIL under Section 25O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short, the ID Act), but this was set aside by … Closure permission was granted by the State Government to NOCIL under Section 25O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short, the ID Act), but

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 2012

Gajanan Gangaram Patil and Others Vs. M/S. Relene Petrochemicals Ltd. ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-12-2012

Subject : Labour and Industrial

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (II) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … difficulties. 3 On 20 March, 2003, a Closure permission was granted by the State Government to NOCIL under Section 25O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short, the ID Act), but this was set aside by … Closure permission was granted by the State Government to NOCIL under Section 25O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short, the ID Act), but

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 12 2000

K. Komaraiah Vs. Industrial Tribunal-cum-additional Labour Court, Hyde ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-12-2000

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2-A, 11-A, 18(1) and 25-FFF & O, 25(H)(2); Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1982; Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

Reported in : 2000(5)ALD298; 2000(4)ALT441; [2000(87)FLR357]

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … In connection with the reopening of the establishment, the 2nd respondent entered into settlement under sub-section (1) of Section 18 of the Act benefiting only those employees who were on its permanent roll and accordingly such employees … 2nd respondent sought permission of the Government of Andhra Pradesh under Seclion 25O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short 'the Act') seeking permission

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2001

Ballkhan Doskhan Joya Vs. Gujarat Electricity Board

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-09-2001

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 3, 4(5) and 18; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 25-F; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1984; Constitution of India - Article 227; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

Reported in : [2002(92)FLR914]; (2001)3GLR2666

the Air Force Act, 1950 (XLV of 1950) or the Army Act, 1950 (XLV1 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (LXII of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … : (2000)IILLJ1116Guj , whereby the Award of reinstatement of the employee with 25% of back wages passed by the Labour Court on 15-10-1994 has been … on 27-11-1981 on the ground that the contract of apprenticeship sent to the Apprenticeship Adviser in accordance with Section 4(5) of the Apprentices Act, 1961 has not been registered. The employee then approached the Labour Court under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 13 2005

Superintending Engineer and anr. Vs. Dattatraya Mahadeo Badarkhe and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-13-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2S, 25B, 25(N); Apprentice Act, 1961 - Sections 18; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Industrial Disputes Central Rules - Rule 81; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2006(2)ALLMR193; 2006(2)MhLj349

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee … should be regularized as and when vacancies arose. Their contention that there was no compliance of provisions of section 25(N) of the Industrial Disputes Act, and also of Rule 81 of the Industrial Disputes Central Rules. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 2012

Umesh Kumar Singh Vs. the Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Eastern Na ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Decided on : Jan-05-2012

Subject : MRTP

thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.2) Did at about 19.20 hours on the 4th day of June, 1998 wrongfully confine Shri N.K.Marwaha, Branch Manager … length and 2” in circumference and three rounds of 7.62mm ammunition and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 25(1-A) of the Arms Act 1959 read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act 1957.4) Did remain absent without

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 2000

Union of India and Others Vs. R.P. Yadav

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-10-2000

Subject : ServiceContract

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 3(20), 11, 14(1), 15, 16, 17, 18, 41 and 184(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Contract Act - Sections 18, 19; Indian Contract Act, 1982 - Sections 18(1)

Reported in : AIR2000SC2252; JT2000(6)SC371; 2000(4)SCALE600; (2000)5SCC325; [2000]Supp1SCR196; (2000)3UPLBEC2174

In our view the answer to the first question rests on the interpretation of relevant provisions of the, Navy Act, 1957, the Navy (Discipline and Misc. Provision) Regulation 1965 and Navy Order No. Str. 17 of 1994 regarding re-engagement … Misc. Provision) Regulation 1965 and Navy Order No. Str. 17 of 1994 regarding re-engagement of 'Sailors' (RP/0805/93). In Section 3(20) 'sailor' is defined as a person in the naval service other than an officer. In Section 11, … grant re-engagement to sailors including sailors in low medical category, up to 25 years of service have been delegated to the Commodore, Bureau of Sailors,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial