Advanced Search Results
The Maharashtra State Co-operative Agricultural and Rural Development ...
Mumbai Aurangabad
Mar-11-2016
Land Acquisition
the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … The President, Vinkar Cooperative Society Ltd. Chanda and Others, AIR 1966 Bombay 187. (ii) Cooperative Central Bank Ltd. and Others Vs. Additional Industrial Tribunal, Andhra … has concluded that the conditions of services between the employees and the bank is outside the scope of Section 91 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as Section 91 of the 1960 Act).
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Karnataka Lingayat Education Society, Vs. Siddappa G Namba,
Karnataka Dharwad
Jun-02-2017
Education
the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … only regarding the jurisdiction of the Labour Court to decide such applications of the respondent - workmen under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short ‘the Act’).2. The issue involved before the Labour Court
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommopore C.P. George Vs. Chief of Naval Staff
Delhi
May-08-1995
Service
Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 81, 81(1), 82, 82(20), 93 and 94(2)
58(1995)DLT578
are of the view that the Chief of Naval Staff has such a power.(15) Section 81(l)(n) of the Navy Act, 1957 permits other minor punishments which were being imposed by 'custom' to be imposed. Section 82 deals with the … reason. Though a Commodore is B to retire on completion of 54 years, the relevant provision (See pages 187-188 of the paper book) dated 26-10-1983 called 'Working Rules for retirement of Naval Officers' say that a Captain
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Monroe Vs. Pape
US Supreme Court
Feb-20-1961
Right to Information
murdered Parkman, or later, when evil-disposed persons violated her laws in Lowell? Did they require the Army and Navy and martial law? And, sir, because a midnight murderer is sometimes found in the South, it should not … found in that report. Section 131(c) of the Act of September 9, 1957, 71 Stat. 634, 637, amended 42 U.S.C. § 1971 by adding a … APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT Syllabus Under R.S. § 1979, derived from § 1 of the "Ku Klux Act" of April 20, 1871, petitioners (six Negro children and their parents) brought an action in a Federal District … derived from § 1 of the "Ku Klux Act" of April 20, 1871, petitioners (six Negro children and their parents) brought an action in a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnited States Vs. Oregon
US Supreme Court
May-29-1961
Land Acquisition
17 ] See, e.g., Kolovrat v. Oregon, ante, p. 366 U. S. 187 . This was also implicit in the holding in United States v. … in this natural manner. Congress undoubtedly has the power -- under its constitutional powers to raise armies and navies and to conduct wars -- to pay pensions, and to build hospitals and homes for veterans. We think … violate the Tenth Amendment. The controlling provision was passed in 1941 as an amendment to the Sundry Appropriations Act of 1910. [ Footnote 6 ] The 1910 Act quite plainly and unequivocally provided that the admission of … and the central provision of the Act, quoted above, was significantly changed. Section 1 of the new Act restates this provision without reference to the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPublic Utilities Comm'n of California Vs. United States
US Supreme Court
Mar-03-1958
Land Acquisition
expressed by Congress, contingent upon carrier ability to provide safe, adequate, and efficient transportation. [ Footnote 7 ]" Navy regulations provide that, when applicable freight rates "appear excessive," they "may be negotiated for more equitable rates." [ … 8012(f), respectively. [ Footnote 5 ] Armed Services Procurement Regulations, 32 CFR, 1957, Cum.Pocket Supp., § 1.108 et seq. [ Footnote 6 ] Id., § … Leslie Miller, Inc. v. Arkansas, 352 U. S. 187 ; Page 355 U. S. 543 Standard Oil … was an "actual controversy" between the United States and the Commission within the meaning of the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201. Pp. 355 U. S. 536 -539. (b) In the circumstances of this case, the … U. S. 535 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court. Section 530 of the California Public Utilities Code, Cal.Stat.1955, c. 1966, provides in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnited States Vs. United Continental Tuna Corp.
US Supreme Court
Mar-30-1976
Land Acquisition
of the Department, the commanding officer, or certain other persons. In time of war, the Secretary of the Navy can obtain a stay of any suit brought under the Public Vessels Act when it appears that prosecution … as a merchant vessel." Similarly, in Eastern S.S. Lines v. United States, 187 F.2d 956 (CA1 1951), the Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of … the committee made the change that concerns us in this case: it deleted the language in the jurisdictional section of the Suits in Admiralty Act requiring that a vessel be "employed as a merchant vessel." We have
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArnett Vs. Kennedy
US Supreme Court
Apr-16-1974
Land Acquisition
Court held that no hearing need be provided to a cook employed by a private concessionaire of the Navy before the Government revoked her security clearance. The revocation of security clearances was within the "unfettered control" of … is, what kind of hearing must be had. Page 416 U. S. 187 In passing upon claims to a hearing before preliminary but nonfinal deprivations, … for injunctive and declaratory relief, contending that the standards and procedures established by and under the Lloyd-La Follette Act, 5 U.S.C. § 7501, for the removal of nonprobationary employees from the federal service unwarrantedly interfere with such … what kind of speech might be made the basis for removal action. Section 7501 of the Act provides for removal of nonprobationary federal employees "only
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamesh Chand Agrawal Vs. Gopalkrishna Upadhyay and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Sep-21-1996
PropertyCivil
Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 12(1)
1997(1)MPLJ459
the ship was commandeered by His Majesty, a commander holding His Majesty's commission and belonging to the Royal Navy Volunteer Reserves wearing His Majesty's uniform was in charge of the ship, the Admiralty bore all expenses of … Jolly v. Sub-Divisional Officer, Mahasu, Himachal Pradesh, C. R. No. 178 of 1957, decided on 1st of August, 1958, by Bhandari, C. J., of Punjab … view in Sushil Kumar Mehta v. Gobind Kumar Vohra, 1990 (I) PLR 187. It was held that even though there is a notification issued by … for eviction has been passed against the present appellant, under section 12(1)(c) of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961. The finding recorded by the first appellate Court is that the appellant had set up a title
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGravel Vs. United States
US Supreme Court
Jun-29-1972
Land Acquisition
of Art. II (such as the designation of the President as Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy) confer upon the Executive an inherent power to classify documents. See Report of the Commission on Government Security, … in his possession, is not controverted." United States v. Burr, 25 F.Cas. 187, 191 (No. 14,694) (CC Va. 1807). Yet he "may have sufficient motives … but modified the protective order, ruling that congressional aides and other persons may not be questioned regarding legislative acts, and that, though the private publication was not constitutionally protected, a common law privilege similar to the privilege … petition for certiorari, the Government asked us to consider: "Whether Article 1, Section 6, of the Constitution providing that, ' . . . for any
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »