Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: navy act 1957 section 183 · Page 1 of about 16 results (0.024 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 25 2008

G. Pratibha Raghuram W/O Shri G. Raghuram and S.K. Alwar F/O G. Pratib ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-25-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy Regulation; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 49, 49(1), 49(2), 51 and 183; Army Act, 1950; Evidence Act, 1872

Reported in : 2008(5)ALLMR335; 2009(1)BomCR210; (2008)110BOMLR2571

Board of Inquiry conducted by the respondents, it will be important to refer to certain provisions of the Navy Act, 1957 and also the Regulations framed under the Act. We are concerned with only Section 49(1), and the bare … be prescribed.The consequences of desertion are mentioned in Section 49(2) and the consequences of absence without leave in Section 183. Then come the Regulations, but the Regulations may not be important, in view of the Board of Inquiry

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2001

Union of India and anr. Vs. P.D. Yadav

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-16-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964 - Regulation 15(2); Army Act, 1950 - Sections 71 and 73; Constitution of India - Articles 20 to 22 and 300A; Army Rules, 1950 - Rules 14, 14(5) and 15; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 27, 45, 47, 48, 81 and 82; Military Engineer Services Regulations, 1968; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 2-A(4), 3, 4 and 16; Army Pension Act - Sections 16; Financial Regulation, 1983 - Rule 133

Reported in : 2001IXAD(SC)30; [2001(91)FLR961]; JT2001(8)SC617; 2001LabIC4014; 2001(7)SCALE270; (2002)1SCC405; 2001(4)SCT1002(SC); 2002(1)SLJ299(SC); (2002)1UPLBEC118

the said office and to come afterwards and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 47(a) of the Navy Act, 1957. 3. Did on the Twenty ninth day of September one thousand nine hundred eighty nine at about 1402

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 1988

A. Ram Mohan Vs. Labour Court, Bangalore and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-15-1988

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10, 10(1) and 25F

Reported in : [1989(59)FLR1]; (1989)IILLJ179Kant

- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Army Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957; or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of a … Chandu Lal (supra), the Supreme Court quantified the compensation thus (at page 183) : 'The quantum of compensation has now to be ascertained. Ordinary, the … 1982 (annexure B in W.P. Nos. 10541 and 10542 of 1987). By the same order, the provisions of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act were complied with, in that, the employee was paid one month's salary

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 22 1961

Bell Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-22-1961

Subject : MRTP

which specially apply to such service. These fix the pay to which officers and men belonging to the Navy are entitled, and the rule to be deduced therefrom is that both officers and men become entitled to … several times, [ Footnote 18 ] and finally was made permanent in 1957. [ Footnote 19 ] So far as relevant here, this legislation provides … 215 F.2d 531, second indictment dismissed, 17 F.R.D. 183, affirmed, 350 U.S. 857; United States ex rel. … the date of their discharge from the Army. Held: under 37 U.S.C. § 242 and the Missing Persons Act, petitioners were entitled to the pay and allowances that accrued during their detention as prisoners of war; but … in the United States." "(2) Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be immediately removed from the position or office held by him,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 1976

Middendorf Vs. Henry

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-24-1976

Subject : Land Acquisition

U.S.C. § 865(c). Plaintiffs did not file a petition for review with the Judge Advocate General of the Navy pursuant to Art. 69, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 869. [ Footnote 6 ] In the District Court, plaintiffs … always forbid requiring him to choose." McGautha v. California, 402 U. S. 183 , 402 U. S. 213 (1971). We therefore agree with the defendants … "to exercise justice promptly for relatively minor offenses" in an informal proceeding conducted by a single commissioned officer, acting as judge, factfinder, prosecutor, and defense counsel (with jurisdiction only over noncommissioned officers and other enlisted personnel), who … 1, 46 C.M.R. at 308 n. 1. [ Footnote 15 ] This section provides that a commanding officer (of the grade of major or lieutenant

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 1963

Kennedy Vs. Mendoza-martinez

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Feb-18-1963

Subject : Land Acquisition

Sixth Amendments are "preserved to every one accused of crime who is not attached to the army, or navy, or militia in actual service." Id. at 71 U. S. 123 . [ Footnote 19 ] "[I]f society … war is over, and taking their old places Page 372 U. S. 183 in our society." 90 Cong.Rec. 3261 (1944). Senator Russell, who was manager … relief in Federal District Courts, which rendered judgments declaring that the relevant statutes, § 401(j) of the Nationality Act of 1940, as amended, and § 349(a)(10) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, are unconstitutional. Mendoza-Martinez' … from denying his citizenship subsequently. Pp. 372 U. S. 155 -158. 3. Section 401(j) of the Nationality Act of 1940, as amended, and § 349(a)(10)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 1974

Arnett Vs. Kennedy

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Apr-16-1974

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court held that no hearing need be provided to a cook employed by a private concessionaire of the Navy before the Government revoked her security clearance. The revocation of security clearances was within the "unfettered control" of … rights." Id. at 341 U. S. 170 . Page 416 U. S. 183 To some extent, McGrath and like cases, see Greene v. McElroy, 360 … for injunctive and declaratory relief, contending that the standards and procedures established by and under the Lloyd-La Follette Act, 5 U.S.C. § 7501, for the removal of nonprobationary employees from the federal service unwarrantedly interfere with such … what kind of speech might be made the basis for removal action. Section 7501 of the Act provides for removal of nonprobationary federal employees "only

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 1961

Monroe Vs. Pape

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Feb-20-1961

Subject : Right to Information

murdered Parkman, or later, when evil-disposed persons violated her laws in Lowell? Did they require the Army and Navy and martial law? And, sir, because a midnight murderer is sometimes found in the South, it should not … found in that report. Section 131(c) of the Act of September 9, 1957, 71 Stat. 634, 637, amended 42 U.S.C. § 1971 by adding a … and refused before the federal remedy is invoked. P. 365 U. S. 183 . (d) Misuse of power possessed by virtue of state law and … APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT Syllabus Under R.S. § 1979, derived from § 1 of the "Ku Klux Act" of April 20, 1871, petitioners (six Negro children and their parents) brought an action in a Federal District

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 28 1974

Cass Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-28-1974

Subject : Land Acquisition

judgment of the Court of Appeals. * Together with No. 73-5661, Adams et al. v. Secretary of the Navy et al., also on certiorari to the same court. [ Footnote 1 ] In full, 10 U.S.C. § … payment a fractional part of a year amounting to 6 months [or 183 days] or more shall be counted as a whole year and a … 10 U.S.C. § 687(a) provides for readjustment pay for an Armed Forces reservist who is involuntarily released from active duty and has completed, immediately before his release, "at least five years of continuous active duty," computed by … to the Fleet Reserve or the Fleet Marine Corps Reserve under this section is entitled when not on active duty, to retainer pay at the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 1994

Power Control Appliances and ors. Vs. Sumeet Machines Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-08-1994

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 17, 51, 52 and 55

Reported in : JT1994(2)SC70; 1994(1)SCALE446; (1994)2SCC448; [1994]1SCR708

he has notoriously used the mark. North British Rubber Company, Ltd. v. Gormully and Jeffery . v. Army Navy and Civil Service Co-operative Society of South Africa Ltd. (1902) 19 R.P.C. 574, Hayward Bros. Ltd. v. Peakall … owner of copyright with respect of all the above items in terms of Section 17 of the Copyright Act, 1957. 'Sumeet' mixy came to be in great demand in India and abroad. The business expanded. To cope up … acquiescence could be upheld, is suited. In Bostitch Trade Mark 1963 RFC 183 the plea of acquiescence has been dealt with. Judged in the light

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial