Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: navy act 1957 section 182 · Page 1 of about 11 results (0.030 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 23 2013

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-23-2013

Subject : Education

27th August, 1991 passed by Admiral L.R. Ramdas, Chief of the Naval Staff under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 maintaining the conviction of the petitioner on all charges except the charge 20 and reducing the sentence of … to a witness is required to be decided by the TJA under Regulation 179. By virtue of Regulation 182, the TJA is permitted to allow a witness to be called or recalled WP(C) No.6563/2011 page 28 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 2002

S. Chaoba Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Oct-01-2002

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Constitution of India (15th Amendment) Act, 1963; Constitution of India (47th Amendment) Act, 1976; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 19 and 25

authority under the Army Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), the Air Force Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957), the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (47 of 1968), the Coast Guard Act, 1978 (30 … is charged with :-BSF Act Abetment of commissions of an offence by a public servant Sec. 46 under Section 7 punishable under Section 12 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.In that, they while on OP duty at … to smugglers to cross cattle from India to Bangladesh near RP No. 182/5-8 after Rs. 2000 as bribe money.Place : NarayanpurDated 12 April, 1999.Sd/-       12.04.99    

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2006

Indian Telephone Industries Ltd. Vs. the Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on : Jul-27-2006

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2006)(113)ECC432

for the telecommunication equipment to be supplied as stores for consumption on board a vessel of the Indian Navy. The Asst. Collector rejected the classification on the ground that the telecommunication equipment to be fitted in building … Central Excise Rules, 1944, read with Sub-section (3) of the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act 1957 (58 of 1957), the Central Government hereby exempts excisable goods supplied as stores for consumption on board a … Goa (ii) Lloyd Insulations (India) Ltd. v. CCE, Indore 2004 (176) ELT 182(Tri.-Mumbai).6. We have gone through the records of the case carefully. We reproduce

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 15 1988

A. Ram Mohan Vs. Labour Court, Bangalore and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-15-1988

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10, 10(1) and 25F

Reported in : [1989(59)FLR1]; (1989)IILLJ179Kant

- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Army Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957; or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of a … 1982 (annexure B in W.P. Nos. 10541 and 10542 of 1987). By the same order, the provisions of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act were complied with, in that, the employee was paid one month's salary … American Airways, (1985-II-LLJ-181) The relevant portion of the judgment reads (at pp. 182-183) : 'It is difficult to agree with the finding of the Labour

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2026

Union of India vs Lt Col Mukul Dev

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-23-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Air Force Act 1950 or sentence of death in terms of Section 71 (1) (a) of the Navy Act, 1957, coupled with the factum that the decision of the Tribunal is final in terms of Section 29 of … train would be covered by the expression. Recognizing the fact that two interpretations were27 (1875) 1 Ch D 182 28 AIR 1941 FC 72 29 Raghuraj Singh v. Hari Kishan, AIR 1944 PC 35, per Lord Atkin

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 29 1959

Greene Vs. Mcelroy

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-29-1959

Subject : Education

the design of a rocket launcher, both of which were produced by ERCO and long used by the Navy. During the post-World War II period, petitioner was given security clearances on three occasions. [ Footnote 1 ] … manufactured materials for national defense. Report of the Commission on Government Security, 1957, S.Doc.No.64, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. 236. During World War II, the War … ] See Bailey v. Richardson, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 248, 182 F.2d 46, affirmed by an equally divided Court, … his security clearance was unlawful and void and an order restraining the Secretaries of the Armed Forces from acting pursuant to it. Held: In the absence of explicit authorization from either the President or Congress, the Secretaries … subsections (b)-(e), the head of an agency may, in negotiating contracts under section 2304 of this title, make any kind of contract that he considers

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2011

K.C. Shibu Vs. Union of India, Represented by Secretary to the Governm ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Decided on : May-19-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

08° 19.62'N 73° 03.4'E off Minicoy island and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 55(2) of the Navy Act 1957. ii. Charge 2. Between 25th day of November 2003 and 29th day of November 2003 contravene Regulation 1331 … with the documents to accompany a circumstantial letter and Regulation 155 deals with Charge Sheet. Regulation 156 to 182 deals with the duties of the convening authority, duties of the trial Judge Advocate, preparation of the defence

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 1974

Arnett Vs. Kennedy

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Apr-16-1974

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court held that no hearing need be provided to a cook employed by a private concessionaire of the Navy before the Government revoked her security clearance. The revocation of security clearances was within the "unfettered control" of … or for such cause as it deemed sufficient." Reagan v. United States, 182 U. S. 419 , 182 U. S. 425 (1901); Shurtleff v. United … for injunctive and declaratory relief, contending that the standards and procedures established by and under the Lloyd-La Follette Act, 5 U.S.C. § 7501, for the removal of nonprobationary employees from the federal service unwarrantedly interfere with such … what kind of speech might be made the basis for removal action. Section 7501 of the Act provides for removal of nonprobationary federal employees "only

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 26 1972

Laird Vs. Tatum

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-26-1972

Subject : Land Acquisition

a question not now raised, for we deal here not with the "militia," but with "armies." The Army, Navy, and Air Force are comprehended in the constitutional term "armies." Article I, § 8, provides that Congress may … the Army by President Kennedy, and another for the Air Force in 1957 by President Eisenhower. Thus, when the Pentagon entered a Washington, D.C., conference, … of Rights and the Military, 37 N.Y.U.L.Rev. 181, 182, 193 (1962). [ Footnote 2/6 ] The Federalist … 1968, Army Intelligence established a data-gathering system, which respondents describe as involving the "surveillance of lawful civilian political activity." Held: Respondents' claim that their First Amendment rights are chilled due to the mere existence of this data-gathering … and other domestic violence if and when the conditions described in that section obtain within one of the States. Pursuant to those provisions, President Johnson

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 26 1981

Lehman Vs. Nakshian

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-26-1981

Subject : Land Acquisition

purposes" of the Act. Respondent federal employee brought suit in Federal District Court against the Secretary of the Navy under § 15(c), alleging violations of the Act and demanding a jury trial. The District Court ruled, over … trials in ADEA suits against the Federal Government. Page 453 U. S. 182 [ Footnote 2/1 ] As the Court of Appeals correctly noted: "Since … extend to federal employees the Act's protection of older workers against discrimination in the workplace based on age. Section 15(c) of the Act provides that any aggrieved federal employee "may bring a civil action in any Federal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial