Advanced Search Results

Gurumukh Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi),

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 14; Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964 - Regulations 78, 82, 85, 95, 278, 279 and 280; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2007(2)ALLMR95; 2007(1)BomCR893

to be enlisted initially as a sailor for a period of 10 years. Under the provisions of the Navy Act, 1957, Section 14, Officers and Sailors shall be liable to serve in the Indian Navy or the Indian Naval Reserved … the Pension Regulations. Deficiency upto 180 days is condoned by the Commodore, Bureau of Sailors and deficiency from 181 days upto 365 days is condoned by NHQ(COP). Regulation 82 reads as under:82. Condonation of deficiency in service

A. Ram Mohan Vs. Labour Court, Bangalore and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10, 10(1) and 25F

Reported in : [1989(59)FLR1]; (1989)IILLJ179Kant

- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Army Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957; or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of a … 1982 (annexure B in W.P. Nos. 10541 and 10542 of 1987). By the same order, the provisions of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act were complied with, in that, the employee was paid one month's salary

Bell Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

which specially apply to such service. These fix the pay to which officers and men belonging to the Navy are entitled, and the rule to be deduced therefrom is that both officers and men become entitled to … several times, [ Footnote 18 ] and finally was made permanent in 1957. [ Footnote 19 ] So far as relevant here, this legislation provides … 366 U. S. 414 -415. ___ Ct. Cl.___, 181 F. Supp. 668, reversed and remanded. MR. JUSTICE … the date of their discharge from the Army. Held: under 37 U.S.C. § 242 and the Missing Persons Act, petitioners were entitled to the pay and allowances that accrued during their detention as prisoners of war; but … in the United States." "(2) Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be immediately removed from the position or office held by him,

Union of India Vs. R.C. Jain

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 184; Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964 - Regulation 79

Reported in : 25(1984)DLT245; 1984LabIC1935

of the Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964 framed in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 184 of The Navy Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), as also Section 13 of the Act requiring oath of allegiance to … similarly the advancement of 'Ordinary Searnaa' to the higher category of 'Able Seaman' and so on. (12) Rule 181 of Pension Regulations for the Royal Indian Navy, 1943 also provided for the exclusion of any service rendered

Gosa Vs. Mayden

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

discharged in 1946. He instituted suit in 1970, relying on O'Callahan, seeking to compel the Secretary of the Navy to overturn his court-martial conviction for auto theft and to correct his military records with respect to his … Justice Warren's paper, The Bill of Rights and the Military, 37 N.Y.U.L.Rev. 181, 188-189 (1962). It, of course, would demean the constitutional rights to indictment … question in O'Callahan was the appropriateness of the exercise of jurisdiction by a military forum, pursuant to an Act of Congress, over a nonservice-connected offense when balanced against the guarantees of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. Pp.

Laird Vs. Tatum

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

a question not now raised, for we deal here not with the "militia," but with "armies." The Army, Navy, and Air Force are comprehended in the constitutional term "armies." Article I, § 8, provides that Congress may … the Army by President Kennedy, and another for the Air Force in 1957 by President Eisenhower. Thus, when the Pentagon entered a Washington, D.C., conference, … Bill of Rights and the Military, 37 N.Y.U.L.Rev. 181, 182, 193 (1962). [ Footnote 2/6 ] The … 1968, Army Intelligence established a data-gathering system, which respondents describe as involving the "surveillance of lawful civilian political activity." Held: Respondents' claim that their First Amendment rights are chilled due to the mere existence of this data-gathering … and other domestic violence if and when the conditions described in that section obtain within one of the States. Pursuant to those provisions, President Johnson

Ministry of Defence (Respondent) Vs. Ab and Others (Appellants)

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

prior to 23 December 2001. He had performed his National Service as an engineer mechanic with the Royal Navy and in 1956 had served aboard HMS Diana near the Monte Bello islands when its function had been … served with the RAF as an aircraft fitter on Christmas Island in 1957 when detonations had taken place off Malden Island, and again in 1958, … Merrett Syndicates Ltd [2001] Lloyd's Rep PN 178, 181, which conveniently sets out some of the most … and Lord Kerr to the meaning of the word "knowledge" in sections 11(4) and 14(1) of the Limitation Act 1980 ("the Act") is misconceived and would throw the practical application of the subsections into disarray. I also … Hale and Lord Kerr to the meaning of the word "knowledge" in sections 11(4) and 14(1) of the Limitation Act 1980 ("the Act") is misconceived

Lehman Vs. Nakshian

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

purposes" of the Act. Respondent federal employee brought suit in Federal District Court against the Secretary of the Navy under § 15(c), alleging violations of the Act and demanding a jury trial. The District Court ruled, over … 15(b) to enforce ADEA provisions protecting federal employees. Page 453 U. S. 181 See 39 Fed.Reg. 24351 (1974), reprinted as amended at 29 CFR §§ … extend to federal employees the Act's protection of older workers against discrimination in the workplace based on age. Section 15(c) of the Act provides that any aggrieved federal employee "may bring a civil action in any Federal

Arnett Vs. Kennedy

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court held that no hearing need be provided to a cook employed by a private concessionaire of the Navy before the Government revoked her security clearance. The revocation of security clearances was within the "unfettered control" of … any hearing at any time when the Government Page 416 U. S. 181 discharges a person from his job, even though good cause for the … for injunctive and declaratory relief, contending that the standards and procedures established by and under the Lloyd-La Follette Act, 5 U.S.C. § 7501, for the removal of nonprobationary employees from the federal service unwarrantedly interfere with such … what kind of speech might be made the basis for removal action. Section 7501 of the Act provides for removal of nonprobationary federal employees "only

Hari Shankar JaIn and anr. Vs. Executive Engineer, Rural Electrificati ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1977)IILLJ429All

such person-(i) who is subject to the Army Act, 1950, or the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957; or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of a … be operative on the purchase of the undertaking by the Board or on the framing of regulations under Section 79(e) of the Electricity (Supply) Act 1948?3. Whether Section 13B of the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946,