Advanced Search Results

Asoke Chowdhury and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : West Bengal Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 22B, 28, 38, 65, 67, 68(3), 69, 96, 96(1), 96(2), 96(4), 107, 111, 138, 159, 176, 211 and 212; ;West Bengal Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 - Rules 88A, 88B and 270(1); ;West Bengal Motor Vehicles (Second Amendment) Rules, 2005; ;Constitution of India - Article 19 and 19(1)

Reported in : AIR2007Cal176

vehicle conforms to the said colour specifications.Type of Vehicle prescribed colourCONTRACT CARRIAGE(Metered Taxi)Mustard yellow body with 10 cm NavyBlue from Headlight to backlight onthe both sides. The word Taxi shallbe inscribed on the center of thedriver's door … challenge is on the point that the State Government had no power under the West Bengal Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 to amend the rule for fixing a particular colour scheme as has been intended to be done … in the Kolkata Gazette.NOW, THEREFORE, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sections 28, 38, 65, 96, 107, 111, 138, 159 and 176 read with

Arnett Vs. Kennedy

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court held that no hearing need be provided to a cook employed by a private concessionaire of the Navy before the Government revoked her security clearance. The revocation of security clearances was within the "unfettered control" of … suspension to be made by an impartial agency Page 416 U. S. 177 official, or for Kennedy (by his own means) to present witnesses; or … for injunctive and declaratory relief, contending that the standards and procedures established by and under the Lloyd-La Follette Act, 5 U.S.C. § 7501, for the removal of nonprobationary employees from the federal service unwarrantedly interfere with such … what kind of speech might be made the basis for removal action. Section 7501 of the Act provides for removal of nonprobationary federal employees "only

Lehman Vs. Nakshian

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

purposes" of the Act. Respondent federal employee brought suit in Federal District Court against the Secretary of the Navy under § 15(c), alleging violations of the Act and demanding a jury trial. The District Court ruled, over … extending protection to federal employees, is consistent with Page 453 U. S. 177 the conclusion that Congress intended to allow jury trials. Congress' failure to … extend to federal employees the Act's protection of older workers against discrimination in the workplace based on age. Section 15(c) of the Act provides that any aggrieved federal employee "may bring a civil action in any Federal

United States Vs. Testan

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

37 U.S.C. § 202(1) to the effect that an officer "serving as Assistant Judge Advocate General of the Navy is entitled to the basic pay of a rear admiral (lower half) or brigadier general, as appropriate. Page … claimed that he had been wrongfully discharged. Compare Keim v. United States, 177 U. S. 290 , 177 U. S. 293 -296 (1900), with United … another agency, and that, under the principle of "equal pay for substantially equal work" prescribed in the Classification Act, they were entitled to the higher classification. But their agency, and the Civil Service Commission (CSC) on appeal, … pay lost through allegedly improper classifications. To be sure, in the "purpose" section of the Act, 5 U.S.C. § 5101(1)(A), Congress stated that it was

Gravel Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Art. II (such as the designation of the President as Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy) confer upon the Executive an inherent power to classify documents. See Report of the Commission on Government Security, … U. S. 169 , 383 U. S. 172 , 383 U. S. 177 ; and Tenney v. Brandhove, 341 U. S. 367 , 341 U. … but modified the protective order, ruling that congressional aides and other persons may not be questioned regarding legislative acts, and that, though the private publication was not constitutionally protected, a common law privilege similar to the privilege … petition for certiorari, the Government asked us to consider: "Whether Article 1, Section 6, of the Constitution providing that, ' . . . for any

United States Vs. United Continental Tuna Corp.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the Department, the commanding officer, or certain other persons. In time of war, the Secretary of the Navy can obtain a stay of any suit brought under the Public Vessels Act when it appears that prosecution … had generated considerable confusion. [ Footnote 14 ] Page 425 U. S. 177 Second, the committee made the change that concerns us in this case: … the committee made the change that concerns us in this case: it deleted the language in the jurisdictional section of the Suits in Admiralty Act requiring that a vessel be "employed as a merchant vessel." We have