Advanced Search Results

Dhirendra Kumar Singh and Others Vs. State of A.P. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 4, (2), 5, 428, 437 and 439; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3(22), 77, 78, (1), (2), 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 93, (2), (3), 151 and 184; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 342 and 392; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(1-B)(A) and 27; Air-Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 176; Navy (Discipline and Miscellaneous provisions) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 89 and 92(2)

Reported in : 1999(4)ALD452; 1999(2)ALT(Cri)312; 1999CriLJ4421

applicable in view of the fact that the petitioners are to be proceeded with Court-Martial proceedings under the Navy Act.5. The learned Counsel for the petitioners Mr. Ramanaimirthy for Sri Vasudeva Rao contends that under Section 4 of … of sentence cannot be applied to a person convicted under Courts-Martial. The Supreme Court observed that inasmuch as Section 176 of the Army Act (sic. 167 of the Army Act) deals with the topic as to the date

Umesh Kumar Singh Vs. the Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Eastern Na ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : MRTP

thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.2) Did at about 19.20 hours on the 4th day of June, 1998 wrongfully confine Shri N.K.Marwaha, Branch Manager … belongs to Naval Police branch and he was subordinate to NPM J.A.Rooque. In answer to Question No.167 to 176,P.W.2 accepted that although he signed the mediators report, but he was not present at the time of recovery

Ajmer Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 5, 428, and 475; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 167; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

Reported in : AIR1987SC1646; 1987CriLJ1877; 1987(2)Crimes433(SC); JT1987(2)SC290; 1987(1)SCALE953; (1987)3SCC340; [1987]3SCR84; 1987(2)LC219(SC)

Central Government may make rules consistent with this Code and the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957), and the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) and any other law, relating to … is to be assumed to be correct (which assumption we shall presently show is wholly unwarranted), inasmuch as Section 176 of the Act specifically deals with the topic of the date of commencement of the sentence of imprisonment,

Naib-subedar Sethurathinam Vs. Union of India Represented by Its Secre ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

or involved in such findings under the provisions of the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) or the Air Force Act, 1950, (45 of 1950) as the case may be; or … have been grave violations such as pre-trial custody not being set off which is violative of Army Act Section 169-A, non-compliance of Supreme Courts order, not passing any order on the post-confirmation petition and illegally destroying the

Indian Telephone Industries Ltd. Vs. the Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2006)(113)ECC432

for the telecommunication equipment to be supplied as stores for consumption on board a vessel of the Indian Navy. The Asst. Collector rejected the classification on the ground that the telecommunication equipment to be fitted in building … Central Excise Rules, 1944, read with Sub-section (3) of the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act 1957 (58 of 1957), the Central Government hereby exempts excisable goods supplied as stores for consumption on board a

Mangal Singh Bhatti Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 78, 78(1) and 78(2); Navy Regulations - Regulations 28, 30, 149 and 151; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of jurisdiction) Rules, 1978 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 9; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 192, 209, 240, 246(1), 252, 254, 255(1), 255(2), 256(1), 257, 475 and 475(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 549

Reported in : 1993CriLJ3070

seeking transfer of the case of the detenu to the Commanding Officer, INS Venduruthy, for trial under the Navy Act, 1957, and in accordance with the provisions of Section 78 of the Navy Act, 475 of the Cr.P.C. and … 249: (1963 (2) Cri LJ 161); the Bombay High Court in Emperor v. Jerry D'Sena, AIR 1945 Bom 176: (46 Cri LJ 99); the Mysore High Court in Ramanujan v. State of Mysore, AIR 1962 Mysore 196

Bell Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

which specially apply to such service. These fix the pay to which officers and men belonging to the Navy are entitled, and the rule to be deduced therefrom is that both officers and men become entitled to … several times, [ Footnote 18 ] and finally was made permanent in 1957. [ Footnote 19 ] So far as relevant here, this legislation provides … provisions or regulations adverted to." 15 Op.Atty.Gen. 175, 176. This principle has received consistent recognition in the … the date of their discharge from the Army. Held: under 37 U.S.C. § 242 and the Missing Persons Act, petitioners were entitled to the pay and allowances that accrued during their detention as prisoners of war; but … in the United States." "(2) Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be immediately removed from the position or office held by him,

Asoke Chowdhury and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : West Bengal Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 22B, 28, 38, 65, 67, 68(3), 69, 96, 96(1), 96(2), 96(4), 107, 111, 138, 159, 176, 211 and 212; ;West Bengal Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 - Rules 88A, 88B and 270(1); ;West Bengal Motor Vehicles (Second Amendment) Rules, 2005; ;Constitution of India - Article 19 and 19(1)

Reported in : AIR2007Cal176

in the Kolkata Gazette.NOW, THEREFORE, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sections 28, 38, 65, 96, 107, 111, 138, 159 and 176 read with … vehicle conforms to the said colour specifications.Type of Vehicle prescribed colourCONTRACT CARRIAGE(Metered Taxi)Mustard yellow body with 10 cm NavyBlue from Headlight to backlight onthe both sides. The word Taxi shallbe inscribed on the center of thedriver's door … challenge is on the point that the State Government had no power under the West Bengal Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 to amend the rule for fixing a particular colour scheme as has been intended to be done

Crandon Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

172 Dictionary 2203 (1957) (emphasis added). See also Benedict v. United States, 176 U. S. 357 , 176 U. S. 360 (1900) ("The word salary' … financial connection with the company. Thus, petitioner Paisley, who took early retirement to become Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Engineering and Systems -- an office that requires confirmation by the United States Senate -- estimated … Id. at 1387. Finally, the District Court concluded that the payments "created neither the appearance of nor an actual conflict of interest," and that the Government had not been injured by the payments, and was therefore not, … intended to be supplemental compensation for Government service was clearly erroneous. Held: Section 209(a) does not apply to a severance payment that is made to

Public Utilities Comm'n of California Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

expressed by Congress, contingent upon carrier ability to provide safe, adequate, and efficient transportation. [ Footnote 7 ]" Navy regulations provide that, when applicable freight rates "appear excessive," they "may be negotiated for more equitable rates." [ … 8012(f), respectively. [ Footnote 5 ] Armed Services Procurement Regulations, 32 CFR, 1957, Cum.Pocket Supp., § 1.108 et seq. [ Footnote 6 ] Id., § … e.g., Baltimore & Annapolis R. Co. v. Lichtenberg, 176 Md. 383, 4 A.2d 734, appeal dismissed, United … was an "actual controversy" between the United States and the Commission within the meaning of the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201. Pp. 355 U. S. 536 -539. (b) In the circumstances of this case, the … U. S. 535 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court. Section 530 of the California Public Utilities Code, Cal.Stat.1955, c. 1966, provides in