Advanced Search Results

V. Siva Kumar and ors. Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Defence and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy Grade-C Non-Industrial Posts, Store House Staff, Recruitment Rules, 1984; Constitution of India - Article 309

Reported in : 2008(3)ALD41(SC); [2008(116)FLR540]; (2008)2MLJ761(SC); 2008(1)SCALE293; (2008)2SCC99; 2008AIRSCW530; 2008LABIC766

Seniority: [Dr. Arijit Pasayat & P. Sathasivam, JJ] Store Keepers Inter se seniority - Navy Act (62 of 1957), Section 174 Navy Grade-C Non-Industrial Posts, Store House Staff, Recruitment Rules, 1984, Rule 1 Office Memo fixing new principles of

The State Of Sikkim Vs. Jasbir Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

the CrPC has empowered the Central Government to make rules consistent with the CrPC and the Army Act, Navy Act 1957 and the Air Force Act 1950 and any other law relating to the Armed Forces of the Union, … unnatural death that is death due to suicide, violence or under suspicious circumstances information should be given under Section 174 of the Criminal Procedure Code to the civil authorities, and the conduct of Maj. Agarwal in sending information

State of West Bengal Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 31, 73, 162, 245, 246, 248, 249, 254, 294 and 298; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 2 and 2(3)

Reported in : AIR1963SC1241; [1964]1SCR371

exercise the acquisition of lands in all the States. These are needed for forts, armories and arsenals, for navy yards and light houses, for custom-houses, post offices and Court-houses, and for other public uses. If the right … exercise of authority conferred by Sections 6, 7 and 9 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957. The Act was enacted for establishing in the economic interest of India greater public control over the coal … ................................................' Just like s. 172 being the forerunner of Art. 294, Sections 174 and 175 are phrased in terms similar and correspond to Arts. 296 … referred to as the Act - enacted by the Parliament, and particularly Sections 4 and 7 thereof, were ultra vires the legislative competence of Parliament,

Greene Vs. Mcelroy

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Education

the design of a rocket launcher, both of which were produced by ERCO and long used by the Navy. During the post-World War II period, petitioner was given security clearances on three occasions. [ Footnote 1 ] … manufactured materials for national defense. Report of the Commission on Government Security, 1957, S.Doc.No.64, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. 236. During World War II, the War … U. S. 242 -244; Kirby v. United States, 174 U. S. 47 ; Motes v. United States, … his security clearance was unlawful and void and an order restraining the Secretaries of the Armed Forces from acting pursuant to it. Held: In the absence of explicit authorization from either the President or Congress, the Secretaries … subsections (b)-(e), the head of an agency may, in negotiating contracts under section 2304 of this title, make any kind of contract that he considers

Protective Committee Vs. Anderson

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

and Puerto Rico on sea-going barges. TMT incurred substantial debts and losses from the unsuccessful conversion of a Navy LSD by a drydock and repair company (M-S). Between 1954 and 1957, TMT issued more than 4,000,000 shares … S. 426 , 289 U. S. 436 (1933). The requirements of §§ 174 and 221(2) of Chapter X, 52 Stat. 891, 897, 11 U.S.C. §§ … acquired by insiders at low prices and disposed of to the public in alleged violation of the Securities Act of 1933 at relatively high prices. As a result of these and other transactions, TMT became unable to … to make an investigation and to conduct a hearing on insolvency. The SEC then petitioned the trial court to investigate its claims that the plan

Lehman Vs. Nakshian

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

purposes" of the Act. Respondent federal employee brought suit in Federal District Court against the Secretary of the Navy under § 15(c), alleging violations of the Act and demanding a jury trial. The District Court ruled, over … 583 . Thus, the Court held, as a Page 453 U. S. 174 matter of statutory construction, that the ADEA allows jury trials in actions … extend to federal employees the Act's protection of older workers against discrimination in the workplace based on age. Section 15(c) of the Act provides that any aggrieved federal employee "may bring a civil action in any Federal

Garcetti Vs. Ceballos

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

see Willis v. Department of Agriculture, 141 F. 3d 1139, 1143 (CA Fed. 1998); Horton v. Department of Navy, 66 F. 3d 279, 282 (CA Fed. 1995), cert. denied, 516 U. S. 1176 (1996), or for statements … See Pickering, supra, at 568. If the answer is no, the employee has no First Amendment cause of action based on the employer’s reaction to the speech. See Connick , supra , at 147. If the answer … views on an important decision of his government.” 429 U. S., at 174-175. In each case, the Court realized that a public employee can wear

Barkat Ali Khan Bahadur Vs. Controller of Estate Duty

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Estate Duty Act, 1953 - Sections 2(15), 5, 22, 44 and 46; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 147

Reported in : (1985)47CTR(AP)229; [1986]158ITR259(AP)

the truth of the representations before the authorities at a later stage. 14. In CIT v. Army and Navy Stores Ltd. : [1957]31ITR959(Bom) it was held that having taken a benefit by a certain representation, the assessee … of Killowen in Scott and Coutts and Co. v. IRC [1937] AC 174; [1936] 3 All ER 752 : 'The expression 'property passing on death' … Amareswari, J.1. The following six questions are referred for our opinion under section 64(1) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 : '1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the sum of Rs.

United States Vs. United Continental Tuna Corp.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the Department, the commanding officer, or certain other persons. In time of war, the Secretary of the Navy can obtain a stay of any suit brought under the Public Vessels Act when it appears that prosecution … S. 446 (1953). In that case, the private Page 425 U. S. 174 owner of a steamship under charter to the United States brought suit … the committee made the change that concerns us in this case: it deleted the language in the jurisdictional section of the Suits in Admiralty Act requiring that a vessel be "employed as a merchant vessel." We have