Advanced Search Results

Office Of The Odisha Lokayukta Vs. Pradeep Kumar Panigrahi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

exercisable by any court or other authority under the Army Act, 1950, the Air Force Act, 1950, the Navy Act, 1957 and the Coast Guard Act, 1978 or the procedure is applicable to such public servant under those Acts; … six months at a time and for the maximum period of two years. (7) Notwithstanding anything contained in section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, any investigating agency (including any special agency) shall, in respect of

Lt. Col. Sudhir Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 80, 163(1) and 165

Reported in : 82(1999)DLT183

under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 read in conjunction with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957. (2) Did at about 1900 hours on the Eleventh day of October, 1996, was guilty of conduct unbecoming … as full an opportunity as is consistent with the exigencies of service for preparing his defense. Vide Reg. 173(1), Regs. Navy Part II (Statutory), it has been provided that except where the accused defends himself, he shall

Commander Ravinder Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Education

convened then it cannot be dissolved except on the conditions which are mentioned in Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957 reads as under; “123. Provisions relating to dissolution of courts-martial – (1) … Cdr S. Dixit, Regulating Officer, INS Kunjali who voluntarily agreed to defend the petitioner in terms of Regulation 173. It is alleged that the CO, INS Kunjali pressurized Cdr S.Dixit by telling him that if he defends

Jawarharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya and ors. Vs. Presiding Offic ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25A and 25F

Reported in : (2002)IVLLJ602MP

person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act 1950, or the Army Act 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957; or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of a … in the year 1985 for 343 days, in the year 1986 for 173 days and in the year 1987 for 89 days. The Labour Court … the Labour Court, The respondent No. 2 submitted that he worked upto 1989 and as the provisions of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 were not observed in their true spirit, his removal tantamounted to

Balwant Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Chandigarh Bench Chandimandir

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Armed Forces Tribunal, as it is not a service matter, either under Army Act 1950, or the Navy Act 1957 or Air Force Act 1950. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not propose to … in Ramesh Singh Vs Union of India and others, (2008) 5 SCC 173. A writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India was … petitioner submits that the Central Government issued notification No. SROs 329 and 330 dated 23rd September, 1960 making Section 21 of the Army Act 1950 and Chapter IV of the Army Rules 1954 applicable to General Reserve

Khazansingh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 - Sections 8; Criminal Law Amendment (Amending) Act, 1966 - Sections 5(1) and 11; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 549

Reported in : AIR1967Raj221

of the Act, to save the jurisdiction exercisable by a Court martial or other authority under the Army. Navy and Air Force Acts (cf. the statement of Objects and Reasons, Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Section 2, dated … accused has been prosecuted. In State of Bihar v. Ram Naresh, AIR 1957 SC 389, an authority on which both the learned counsel placed their … 1966 at the request of the Public Prosecutor enabling him to supply the copies of documents envisaged by Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and for enforcing the attendance of the two accused persons, who were

Lehman Vs. Nakshian

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

purposes" of the Act. Respondent federal employee brought suit in Federal District Court against the Secretary of the Navy under § 15(c), alleging violations of the Act and demanding a jury trial. The District Court ruled, over … statutory provisions. [ Footnote 2/5 ] Although there Page 453 U. S. 173 is no provision which expressly grants or precludes a jury trial, Congress … extend to federal employees the Act's protection of older workers against discrimination in the workplace based on age. Section 15(c) of the Act provides that any aggrieved federal employee "may bring a civil action in any Federal

Mishra Bandhu Karyalaya and ors. Vs. Shivratanlal Koshal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1914 - Sections 1, 2, 5, 6, 7 and 18; Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1957 - Sections 13, 45 and 55; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 39 and 73

Reported in : AIR1970MP261

in India. See W. B. Yeats v. Eric Dickinson, AIR 1938 Lah 173; Dharam Dutt Dhawan v. Ramlal, AIR 1957 Punj 161 and Associated Publishers … to Japan flying the Japanese flag; the Captain of that vessel was, incidentally, an officer in the Japanese Navy. While the vessel was on its voyage, the Japanese Government declared war against China which, besides making the … a perpetual injunction. Accordingly, the learned Judge has decreed the entire claim in suit. 7. Before the Copyright Act, 1957 (Act No. 14 of 1957) was enacted by Parliament, the existing law relating to copyright in India, i.e., … being opposed to public policy and was, therefore, void and unenforceable under Section 23 of the Contract Act. Even otherwise, they alone had the right

Garcetti Vs. Ceballos

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

see Willis v. Department of Agriculture, 141 F. 3d 1139, 1143 (CA Fed. 1998); Horton v. Department of Navy, 66 F. 3d 279, 282 (CA Fed. 1995), cert. denied, 516 U. S. 1176 (1996), or for statements … 515 U. S. 819 (1995), of Rust v. Sullivan, 500 U. S. 173 (1991), which held there was no infringement of the speech rights of … See Pickering, supra, at 568. If the answer is no, the employee has no First Amendment cause of action based on the employer’s reaction to the speech. See Connick , supra , at 147. If the answer

United States Vs. United Continental Tuna Corp.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the Department, the commanding officer, or certain other persons. In time of war, the Secretary of the Navy can obtain a stay of any suit brought under the Public Vessels Act when it appears that prosecution … more than $10,000 often found himself in a Page 425 U. S. 173 difficult position. He had to choose between proceeding in the district court … the committee made the change that concerns us in this case: it deleted the language in the jurisdictional section of the Suits in Admiralty Act requiring that a vessel be "employed as a merchant vessel." We have