Advanced Search Results

Lt. Col. Sudhir Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 80, 163(1) and 165

Reported in : 82(1999)DLT183

under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 read in conjunction with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957. (2) Did at about 1900 hours on the Eleventh day of October, 1996, was guilty of conduct unbecoming … operandi followed by TJA and the Court is wholly irregular, illegal and vocative of the statutory provisions. Reg. 172 of Regs. Navy Part II (Statutory) stipulates that an accused for whose trial an application has been made,

Lt. Cdr., M.P. Verma Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 3 to 5, 13, 13(1) and 13(2); Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 2(1), 6, 6(1), 54(2), 65A, 65B, 77(2), 93, 97, 97(6), 97(7) to 97(22), 99, 99(2), 101 to 103, 104, 105, 110, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 123, 124, 130, 133, 162 and 163; Evidence Act - Sections 27, 155 and 155(2); Army Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 100, 102 and 165; Naval Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Navy Rules - Rule 16; Navy (Disciplinary and Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 148, 148(1), 148(5), 149, 151, 153, 167, 168, 169, 172(5) and 242 to 244; Travel Regulations

Reported in : 156(2009)DLT41

TJA, my objection about the members of this August body is in terms of Section 97 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 97, Sub-section (12) provides that, the President of a Court Marital shall be named by the authority ordering … petitioner had requested for an interview with the witnesses for the prosecution on 31.01.2004 and 04.03.2004 under Regulation 172(5) which ought to have been granted by the Court Martial. However it was refused. This affected the preparation

Greene Vs. Mcelroy

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Education

the design of a rocket launcher, both of which were produced by ERCO and long used by the Navy. During the post-World War II period, petitioner was given security clearances on three occasions. [ Footnote 1 ] … manufactured materials for national defense. Report of the Commission on Government Security, 1957, S.Doc.No.64, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. 236. During World War II, the War … 297 U. S. 167 , 297 U. S. 172 ; Ex parte Endo, 323 U. S. 283 … his security clearance was unlawful and void and an order restraining the Secretaries of the Armed Forces from acting pursuant to it. Held: In the absence of explicit authorization from either the President or Congress, the Secretaries … subsections (b)-(e), the head of an agency may, in negotiating contracts under section 2304 of this title, make any kind of contract that he considers

Onkar Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 11 and 184; Navy (Ceremonial Conditions of Service and Miscellaneous Provision) Regulations, 1963 - Regulations 268(1) and 269; Navy Service Pension and Gratuity Pension Regulations (Navy), 1964 - Regulations 78 and 79

Reported in : 2002(2)BomCR247

Miscellaneous Provision) Regulations, 1963, hereinafter referred to as the 'Regulations' which were framed under section 184 of the Navy Act, 1957, hereinafter referred to as the Act. Section 11 relates to the enrolment of sailor. Section 11(2) of the … into consideration. With regard to the remaining ten petitioners in Writ Petition Nos. 164, 165, 168, 169, 170, 172, 222, 224, 225 and 369, all of 1990, if their service prior to the age of 17 years

Middendorf Vs. Henry

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

U.S.C. § 865(c). Plaintiffs did not file a petition for review with the Judge Advocate General of the Navy pursuant to Art. 69, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 869. [ Footnote 6 ] In the District Court, plaintiffs … "to exercise justice promptly for relatively minor offenses" in an informal proceeding conducted by a single commissioned officer, acting as judge, factfinder, prosecutor, and defense counsel (with jurisdiction only over noncommissioned officers and other enlisted personnel), who … 1, 46 C.M.R. at 308 n. 1. [ Footnote 15 ] This section provides that a commanding officer (of the grade of major or lieutenant

Mcelroy Vs. Guagliardo

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

entirely inapposite. Page 361 U. S. 285 Those cases permitted trial by courts-martial of paymasters' clerks in the navy. The Court found that such a position was "an important one in the machinery of the navy," the … ] See Army Regulations 600-201, 20 June 1956, as changed 15 March 1957, and Army Regulations 624-200, 19 May 1958, as changed 1 July 1959. … (1957), was binding as to all classes of persons included within the section and that each class was nonseverable. 104 U.S.App.D.C. 112, 259 F.2d 927. … following: that part of Alaska east of longitude 172 degrees west, the Canal Zone, the main group … Army and stationed in Berlin, was convicted by a general court-martial on a plea of guilty to three acts of sodomy. While serving his five-year sentence, petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in

State of West Bengal Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 31, 73, 162, 245, 246, 248, 249, 254, 294 and 298; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 2 and 2(3)

Reported in : AIR1963SC1241; [1964]1SCR371

all the States. These are needed for forts, armories and arsenals, for navy yards and light houses, for custom-houses, post offices and Court-houses, and for … exercise of authority conferred by Sections 6, 7 and 9 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957. The Act was enacted for establishing in the economic interest of India greater public control over the coal … or attempted to be effected, by the provisions of s. 172, sub-s. (1), paras (a), (b) and (c).' Section 172 which effected this distribution ran : '172. (1) All lands and buildings which immediately before the commencement of

Arnett Vs. Kennedy

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court held that no hearing need be provided to a cook employed by a private concessionaire of the Navy before the Government revoked her security clearance. The revocation of security clearances was within the "unfettered control" of … of the service. [ Footnote 3/1 ]" The Page 416 U. S. 172 regulations of the Civil Service Commission and the Office of Economic Opportunity … for injunctive and declaratory relief, contending that the standards and procedures established by and under the Lloyd-La Follette Act, 5 U.S.C. § 7501, for the removal of nonprobationary employees from the federal service unwarrantedly interfere with such … what kind of speech might be made the basis for removal action. Section 7501 of the Act provides for removal of nonprobationary federal employees "only

C. Gupta Vs. Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceutical Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Industrial Disputes (Amended) Act, 1984

Reported in : 2004(2)BomCR575; [2004(101)FLR1109]; (2004)ILLJ952Bom

to the Air Force Act, 1950(45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957);(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of … of R.G. Makwana v. Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation 1987 1 LLJ 172. The facts of that case were also different. The workman in question … of claim for the reasons mentioned therein, the appellant claimed to be a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 as his work was of 'skilled, technical and clerical nature, apart

Gravel Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Art. II (such as the designation of the President as Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy) confer upon the Executive an inherent power to classify documents. See Report of the Commission on Government Security, … due functioning of the legislative process." 383 U.S. at 383 U. S. 172 . Cf. Burton v. United States, 202 U.S. at 202 U. S. … but modified the protective order, ruling that congressional aides and other persons may not be questioned regarding legislative acts, and that, though the private publication was not constitutionally protected, a common law privilege similar to the privilege … petition for certiorari, the Government asked us to consider: "Whether Article 1, Section 6, of the Constitution providing that, ' . . . for any