Advanced Search Results

Lt. Cdr., M.P. Verma Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 3 to 5, 13, 13(1) and 13(2); Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 2(1), 6, 6(1), 54(2), 65A, 65B, 77(2), 93, 97, 97(6), 97(7) to 97(22), 99, 99(2), 101 to 103, 104, 105, 110, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 123, 124, 130, 133, 162 and 163; Evidence Act - Sections 27, 155 and 155(2); Army Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 100, 102 and 165; Naval Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Navy Rules - Rule 16; Navy (Disciplinary and Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 148, 148(1), 148(5), 149, 151, 153, 167, 168, 169, 172(5) and 242 to 244; Travel Regulations

Reported in : 156(2009)DLT41

TJA, my objection about the members of this August body is in terms of Section 97 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 97, Sub-section (12) provides that, the President of a Court Marital shall be named by the authority ordering … 2005 directed the Central Government to proceed with the disposal of the representation made by the petitioner under Section 162 of the Navy Act. The High Court has clarified that the pendency of the writ petition shall not

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Shivendra Bikaram Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 325, 452 and 497; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 77(2), 97, 101, 102, 162 and 163; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Army Act - Sections 130; Military Laws

Reported in : AIR2003SC2481; 2003(2)ALD(Cri)147; 2003CriLJ3028; JT2003(4)SC235; 2003(4)SCALE284; (2003)6SCC359; [2003]3SCR881; 2003(2)LC1066(SC)

the offences under sections 497, 452 and 325 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2)of the Navy Act, 1957 (hereinafter referredto as 'the Act') and the order of the Chiefof the Naval Staff dated 8th January, 2001passed … referredto as 'the Act') and the order of the Chiefof the Naval Staff dated 8th January, 2001passed under Section 162 of the Act as alsothe order of the Chief of the Naval Staffdated January 31, 2001 passed under

K.N. Surendran Vs. Secretary, Union Bank of India and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 162; Constitution of India - Article 226 and 226(2)

Reported in : 2007(3)KLJ696

Martial and such decision confirmed by the competent authorities, in appeals.2. Petitioner governed by the provisions of the Navy Act, 1957, hereinafter referred to as die 'Act', was posted in Port Blair in Andaman and Nicobar Islands as the … Naval Staff had retained the conviction and sentence. Petitioner, therefore, filed an appeal to the Central Government under Section 162 of the Act. That was rejected on 7-4-1997. He filed O.P. 12185/1997 before this Court. That led to

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

27th August, 1991 passed by Admiral L.R. Ramdas, Chief of the Naval Staff under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 maintaining the conviction of the petitioner on all charges except the charge 20 and reducing the sentence of … made an application dated 29th July, 1991 for judicial review by the Judge Advocate General in terms of Section 162 of the Navy Act. It is submitted that the judicial review was improperly conducted by the very WP(C)

Sh. Raj Kumar M.E.-i Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

contended that their trial was already over and that they were tried under Section 93 (2) of the Navy Act, 1957 and the case against them was also established. 24. The respondents further contended that the petitioner was given … inter-alia, that the petition is premature and that the petitioner did not avail the remedy in terms of Section 162 and 163 of the Navy Act by filing an appeal to the Chief of Naval Staff. The respondents

Umesh Kumar Singh Vs. the Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Eastern Na ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : MRTP

the Navy Act. The applicant, aggrieved by the verdict of the 1st respondent, had filed an application under Section 162 of the Navy Act 1957 to the 2nd respondent. The 2nd respondent by order dated 06.07.2000 reduced the … thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.2) Did at about 19.20 hours on the 4th day of June, 1998 wrongfully confine Shri N.K.Marwaha, Branch Manager

Ajay Kumar Singh Vs. Flag officer Commanding and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

consequential penalties involved. The appellants preferred statutory appeals before the Chief of the Naval Staff in accordance with Section 162 of Navy Act 1957. The Chief of Naval Staff confirmed the conviction of the appellants and reduced the … affirmed the conviction of the appellants under Sections 342 and 392 IPC read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957 and modified the sentence of imprisonment to that of the period already undergone by them. Appellant Dhirendra Kumar

Commander Ravinder Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Education

convened then it cannot be dissolved except on the conditions which are mentioned in Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957 reads as under; “123. Provisions relating to dissolution of courts-martial – (1) … of S.N. Mukherjee Versus Union of India AIR 1990 SC 1984. Their Lordships have discussed the scope of Section 162 of the Army Act which is almost para-material of Section 115 of the Navy Act. In that connection,

Union of India and anr. Vs. P.D. Yadav

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964 - Regulation 15(2); Army Act, 1950 - Sections 71 and 73; Constitution of India - Articles 20 to 22 and 300A; Army Rules, 1950 - Rules 14, 14(5) and 15; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 27, 45, 47, 48, 81 and 82; Military Engineer Services Regulations, 1968; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 2-A(4), 3, 4 and 16; Army Pension Act - Sections 16; Financial Regulation, 1983 - Rule 133

Reported in : 2001IXAD(SC)30; [2001(91)FLR961]; JT2001(8)SC617; 2001LabIC4014; 2001(7)SCALE270; (2002)1SCC405; 2001(4)SCT1002(SC); 2002(1)SLJ299(SC); (2002)1UPLBEC118

the said office and to come afterwards and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 47(a) of the Navy Act, 1957. 3. Did on the Twenty ninth day of September one thousand nine hundred eighty nine at about 1402

Ex Cdre. Narinder Pandit Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

and messing was provided at the outstation, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 60(d) of the Navy Act, 1957. (2) Did on 19th Aug 2002 knowingly make a fraudulent statement in a document, namely Temporary Duty Claim … passed by the court martial was subjected to the remedy available under the law viz. Sections 160 to 162 before the higher authority and it was decided, the JAG could not re-look into the reasons raised in