Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: navy act 1957 section 160 · Page 1 of about 26 results (0.035 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 04 1997

P.D. Yadav Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-04-1997

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Navy Pension Rules, 1964 - Rule 15(2)

Reported in : 1997IIAD(Delhi)901; 66(1997)DLT832; 1997(41)DRJ172

M. Jagannadha Rao, J.(1) These two writ petitions arising under the Navy Act, 1957 have been referred to a Full bench for being disposed of Along with Cwp 2813/94, 2866/90 and 4706/94 … The order was confirmed with modification by the Chief of Naval Staff on 18.8.81. But, in proceedings under Section 160 of the Act, acquitted of charge No. 20, which according to the petitioner was a more serious charge.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 2013

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-23-2013

Subject : Education

27th August, 1991 passed by Admiral L.R. Ramdas, Chief of the Naval Staff under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 maintaining the conviction of the petitioner on all charges except the charge 20 and reducing the sentence of … the Andhra Pradesh High Court on 22 nd July, 1991 permitting the petitioner to seek other remedy under Section 160 or 162 of the Navy Act as well as interim suspension of sentence under Section 164 of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2011

Ex Cdre. Narinder Pandit Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : May-19-2011

Subject : Right to Information

and messing was provided at the outstation, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 60(d) of the Navy Act, 1957. (2) Did on 19th Aug 2002 knowingly make a fraudulent statement in a document, namely Temporary Duty Claim … 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957. 7. It was strenuously argued by learned counsel for the appellant that Section 160(1) of the Act makes it mandatory on the part of the Judge Advocate General (JAG, for brevity) to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 29 2012

Commander Ravinder Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : May-29-2012

Subject : Education

12 calendar months awarded therein and deduction of mulcts for 42 days. 13. Petitioner filed statutory petition under Section 160, 161 and 162 of the Navy Act, 1957 by preferring a Judicial Review before the Chief of Naval … convened then it cannot be dissolved except on the conditions which are mentioned in Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 123 of the Navy Act, 1957 reads as under; “123. Provisions relating to dissolution of courts-martial – (1)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 29 2008

Swapan Kumar Mishra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Oct-29-2008

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2009(1)OLR58

filing a review petition before the Chief of the Naval Staff in consonance with Section 160 of the Navy Act, 1957. The said authority considered the charges framed against the petitioner and the materials available on record and holding

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 1997

Ex-surgeon Commander Bhaskar Roy Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-17-1997

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Navy Act - Sections 81(1)(b) and 82(4); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354

Reported in : 1998(1)MhLj220

was found guilty under section 354, Indian Penal Code and under Sections 68, 77(2) and 74 of the Navy Act, 1957 and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 24 calendar months. He was also dismissed with disgrace from the Naval … order passed by the Court Martial as directed by this Court on Appeal/representation filed by the Petitioner under Section 160 of the Navy Act the Appellate Authority has passed the impugned order which was referred to above. In

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 2010

Vikrampal Singh Versus Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : Apr-26-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

petitions under Article 226. It is now contended that in view of the special provisions contained in the Navy Act, 1957, except for an error of jurisdiction or an order which per se would be perverse, this Tribunal cannot … Martial or the Appropriate authority under the Navy Act. Emphasis has also been laid that the provisions of Section 160 of Navy Act contemplates judicial review which is in the form of appeal wherein all the legal and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2011

K.C. Shibu Vs. Union of India, Represented by Secretary to the Governm ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Decided on : May-19-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

08° 19.62'N 73° 03.4'E off Minicoy island and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 55(2) of the Navy Act 1957. ii. Charge 2. Between 25th day of November 2003 and 29th day of November 2003 contravene Regulation 1331 … procedure of Court-Martial. Chapter XV comprising Sections 160 and 161 deal with Judicial Review of Court Martial proceedings. Section 160 confers power on the Judge Advocate General of the Navy to review the proceedings of trial by court-martial

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 1999

Lt. Col. Sudhir Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-27-1999

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 80, 163(1) and 165

Reported in : 82(1999)DLT183

under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 read in conjunction with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957. (2) Did at about 1900 hours on the Eleventh day of October, 1996, was guilty of conduct unbecoming … proceedings and sentence is passed on an official, he can seek judicial review by filing a petition under Section 160 of the Navy Act. It is in fact under this section that the petitioner had preferred this petition.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 2004

Commodore Narinder M. Pandit S/O Late Munshi Ram Arjundas Pandit Vs. t ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-24-2004

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2004(4)BomCR814; (2004)106BOMLR98

Court Martial. The charge-sheet was issued against the petitioner alleging that the petitioner has committed various offences under Navy Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Navy Act') as well as certain offences punishable under the Prevention of … contended that the statutory remedies are available to the petitioner under Sections 160 and 162 of the Navy Act. As stated earlier, the matter before … of the petitioners were overruled and the Court Martial proceeded further. The petitioner was arraigned in terms of Section 106 of the Navy Act and the petitioner pleaded not guilty to all the charges.4. The contentions raised

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial