Advanced Search Results

Capt. N. Gopalakrishnan (Retired) Vs. Union of India, Rep by the Secre ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : Service

relating to- (i) orders issued under Section 18 of the Army Act, 1950(46 of 1950), sub-section (1) of Section 156 of the Navy Act 1957 (62 of 1957) and section 18 of the Air Force Act 1950 (45 … “3(o) ‘Service matters, in relation to the persons subject to the Army Act 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act 1957 (62 of 1957) and the Air Force Act 1950 (45 of 1950), mean all matters relating to the

Shivendra Bikaram Singh (Ex. Lt.) Vs. Union of India(Uoi), Through the ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 77, 77(2), 78, 78(1), 97, 101, 102, 103 and 163; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 325, 352, 425, 452, and 497; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 50; Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 156

Reported in : 2002(1)BomCR695

(Exh.P.2) as well as order passed by him in exercise of powers conferred under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 vide order dated January 31, 2001 (Exh. P.2/A). The petitioner challenges these orders whereby the Chief of the

G. Pratibha Raghuram W/O Shri G. Raghuram and S.K. Alwar F/O G. Pratib ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Navy Regulation; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 49, 49(1), 49(2), 51 and 183; Army Act, 1950; Evidence Act, 1872

Reported in : 2008(5)ALLMR335; 2009(1)BomCR210; (2008)110BOMLR2571

Board of Inquiry conducted by the respondents, it will be important to refer to certain provisions of the Navy Act, 1957 and also the Regulations framed under the Act. We are concerned with only Section 49(1), and the bare … without an order from the Magistrate. Thus, there appears to be no reason why on the strength of Section 156(3) of the Code, any restriction should be read into the power specifically granted by the legislature to the

Commodore Narinder M. Pandit S/O Late Munshi Ram Arjundas Pandit Vs. t ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2004(4)BomCR814; (2004)106BOMLR98

Court Martial. The charge-sheet was issued against the petitioner alleging that the petitioner has committed various offences under Navy Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Navy Act') as well as certain offences punishable under the Prevention of … of the petitioners were overruled and the Court Martial proceeded further. The petitioner was arraigned in terms of Section 106 of the Navy Act and the petitioner pleaded not guilty to all the charges.4. The contentions raised … by respondent No. 3 was without observing mandatory provisions of Regulation Nos. 156 to 159 of the Regulations.(vi) The members of the Court Martial were

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

27th August, 1991 passed by Admiral L.R. Ramdas, Chief of the Naval Staff under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 maintaining the conviction of the petitioner on all charges except the charge 20 and reducing the sentence of … concerned, a legal objection has been premised by learned counsel for the petitioner on the violation of Regulation 156 Navy (Discipline and Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations, 1965 (`Navy Regulations‟ hereafter) by the respondents.21. Before considering the working of

Ex Cdre. Narinder Pandit Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

and messing was provided at the outstation, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 60(d) of the Navy Act, 1957. (2) Did on 19th Aug 2002 knowingly make a fraudulent statement in a document, namely Temporary Duty Claim … and completed in Delhi area. The court martial was ordered without adhering to the mandatory provisions under Regulations 156 to 159 of the Regulations for Navy Part II (Statutory) (the Regulations, in short). The members of the

The Management of Best and Crompton Engineering Limited Vs. A.M.Sekar ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 2-A(2), 17B, 25-N, 33

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee … v. Delhi Transport Corporation, 1983 Lab. I.C. 1516 : (1983) 4 SCC 156 to drive at home about the jurisdictional factor.41. I have heard the … industrial disputes raised by the first respondents/petitioners before the Labour Court (hereinafter referred to as the employee(s)) under Section 2-A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for brevity, the Act) directing the Management to reinstate the employees

The Maharashtra State Co-operative Agricultural and Rural Development ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … of society notified by the State Government, who is empowered by the Registrar under sub section (J) of section 156, or any orders, decisions, awards and actions of the Registrar against which an appeal under section 152 or

Sri Gururaj R Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … 1947, (hereinafter referred to as ‘the said Act’ for short) as they are Workman within the definition of Section 2(s) of the said Act. Without prejudice to the aforesaid contention, the learned counsel would further submit that,

Dattatraya Gopal Paranjpe Vs. Rashtriya Mill Mazdoor Sangh and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : 1996(5)BomCR246; (1995)IILLJ913Bom

the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … Ganpat Raut v. Cadbury - Fry (India) Pvt. Ltd. 1980 (41) FLR 156 and, relying on this judgment he contends that this judgment lays down … (a) Whether a Trade Union registered under the Trade Unions Act is an 'industry' within the meaning of section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and, (b) even if it is, whether an office bearer of