Advanced Search Results

Umesh Kumar Singh Vs. the Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Eastern Na ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : MRTP

the competent authority has failed to take into account the period already undergone under trial as provided under Section 155 of the Navy Act. The applicant, aggrieved by the verdict of the 1st respondent, had filed an application … thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.2) Did at about 19.20 hours on the 4th day of June, 1998 wrongfully confine Shri N.K.Marwaha, Branch Manager

Lt. Cdr., M.P. Verma Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 3 to 5, 13, 13(1) and 13(2); Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 2(1), 6, 6(1), 54(2), 65A, 65B, 77(2), 93, 97, 97(6), 97(7) to 97(22), 99, 99(2), 101 to 103, 104, 105, 110, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 123, 124, 130, 133, 162 and 163; Evidence Act - Sections 27, 155 and 155(2); Army Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 100, 102 and 165; Naval Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Navy Rules - Rule 16; Navy (Disciplinary and Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 148, 148(1), 148(5), 149, 151, 153, 167, 168, 169, 172(5) and 242 to 244; Travel Regulations

Reported in : 156(2009)DLT41

TJA, my objection about the members of this August body is in terms of Section 97 of the Navy Act, 1957. Section 97, Sub-section (12) provides that, the President of a Court Marital shall be named by the authority ordering … fourteen offenders the Navy authorities produced those vendors as prosecution witnesses. This also impeaches their credit under Section 155(2) of the Evidence Act and makes their testimony inadmissible in evidence. In fact, the statement made by the

Ex Cdre. Narinder Pandit Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

and messing was provided at the outstation, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 60(d) of the Navy Act, 1957. (2) Did on 19th Aug 2002 knowingly make a fraudulent statement in a document, namely Temporary Duty Claim … The witnesses were procured by adopting dubious methods and, therefore, their testimony is impeachable in terms of Section 155(2) of the Act. The court martial failed to comply with the provisions of Section 111(8) of the Act

Mukand Ltd. Vs. Mukand Staff and Officers Association and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 2

Reported in : (2000)ILLJ1583Bom

is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) or the Army Act, 1950 or the Navy Act 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other … By an order dated February 17, 1993 the Government of Maharashtra in exercise of its powers conferred by Section 10(1)(d) of the Act, referred an industrial dispute, which in its opinion, existed between the Mukand Limited and … 1250Rs. 3.70Rs. 1251 to 1350Rs. 3.75Rs. 1351 to 1450Rs. 3.80Rs, 1451 to 1550Rs. 3.85Rs. 1551 to 1650Rs. 3.90Rs. 1651 to 1750Rs. 3.95Rs. 1751 to 1900Rs.

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

27th August, 1991 passed by Admiral L.R. Ramdas, Chief of the Naval Staff under section 163 of the Navy Act, 1957 maintaining the conviction of the petitioner on all charges except the charge 20 and reducing the sentence of … Discipline and Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations, 1965, we may for the convenience set out the provisions of Regulations 153, 155, 156 and 157 which read as follows:“153. Application for Trial - Circumstantial Letter. (1) An application for the

K.C. Shibu Vs. Union of India, Represented by Secretary to the Governm ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Subject : Land Acquisition

08° 19.62'N 73° 03.4'E off Minicoy island and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 55(2) of the Navy Act 1957. ii. Charge 2. Between 25th day of November 2003 and 29th day of November 2003 contravene Regulation 1331 … is known as circumstantial letter. Regulation 154 deals with the documents to accompany a circumstantial letter and Regulation 155 deals with Charge Sheet. Regulation 156 to 182 deals with the duties of the convening authority, duties of

Moragne Vs. States Marine Lines, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

an alternative ground, which is independently sufficient. In that case, which arose from a collision between a Royal Navy submarine and a private vessel, the Crown sought to recover from the owners of the private vessel the … United States Steel Corp., 379 U. S. 148 , 379 U. S. 155 (1964), the Jones Act was intended to achieve "uniformity in the exercise … THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Syllabus Petitioner is not foreclosed from bringing this action under federal maritime law, based on unseaworthiness, for the wrongful death within state territorial waters of her husband. … High Seas Act, 41 Stat. 537, 46 U.S.C. § 761 et seq. Section 1 of that Act provides that: "Whenever the death of a person

Mccarty Vs. Mccarty

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

15 and 21 of the Act of Aug. 3, 1861, 12 Stat. 289, 290, provided that any Army, Navy, or Marine Corps officer with 40 years of service could apply to the President to be retired with … active service; instead, retired pay is funded by annual appropriations. Military Retirement Hearings, at 5. In contrast, since 1957, military personnel have been required to contribute to the Social Security System. Pub.L. 84-881, 70 Stat. 870. See … and Adequacy, 96th Cong., 1st Sess., 15 (Comm.Print 1979) (Women and Retirement). Sections 15 and 21 of the Act of Aug. 3, 1861, 12 Stat.

Ram Gopal Neotia Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1982)1ITD160(Kol.)

the assessee were not competent, the departmental representative has relied on the following decisions: CIT v. Army & Navy Stores Ltd. [1957] 31 ITR 959 (Bom.), Jivatlal Purtupshi v. CIT [1967] 65 ITR 261 at page 267 … Hon. Secy. Keniyara Seva Samaj v. State of Mysore [1969] 23 STC 155 (Mys.).Mr. Agarwalla, the representative for the assessee, in respect of his arguments … of returns in response to notices under Section 139(2)/148 or under the corresponding section of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, the assessees have explained that they could not file the returns or delay occurred in the filing

Anubhav Family Trust Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1990)34ITD303(Mum.)

Dastur referred to the decision of the Bombay High Court in the case of CIT v. Anny & Navy Stores Ltd. [1957] 31 ITR 959. In that case the assessee-company had obtained a particular benefit and escaped … the hands of the trust. This figure of loss was modified to Rs. 81,61,475 by an order Under Section 155 passed by the ITO on 21-1-87. The assessment for the assessment year 1984-85 was first completed by the … against the order of the CIT Under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act relating to the assessment year 1984-85.2. The relevant facts may briefly be